Thomas: "Can you give me another area where a misdemeanor suspends const right?" (Read 2078 times)

Jl808

http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/02/justice_clarence_thomas_asks_q.html

Thomas' question came Monday, Feb. 29, 2016, in a case in which the court is considering placing new limits on the reach of a federal law that bans people convicted of domestic violence from owning guns.

"Ms. Eisenstein, one question," Thomas said. "This is a misdemeanor violation. It suspends a constitutional right. Can you give me another area where a misdemeanor violation suspends a constitutional right?"

Like Scalia, Thomas has long championed Second Amendment gun rights. In December, he and Scalia objected when the high court refused to hear a challenge to a Chicago suburb's assault weapons ban that was upheld by lower courts. Thomas said the justices should not stand by while lower courts relegate "the Second Amendment to a second-class right."
« Last Edit: March 01, 2016, 12:58:40 AM by Jl808 »
I think, therefore I am armed.
NRA Life Patron member, HRA Life member, HiFiCo Life Member, HDF member

The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.

Heavies

http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/02/justice_clarence_thomas_asks_q.html

Thomas' question came Monday, Feb. 29, 2016, in a case in which the court is considering placing new limits on the reach of a federal law that bans people convicted of domestic violence from owning guns.

"Ms. Eisenstein, one question," Thomas said. "This is a misdemeanor violation. It suspends a constitutional right. Can you give me another area where a misdemeanor violation suspends a constitutional right?"

Like Scalia, Thomas has long championed Second Amendment gun rights. In December, he and Scalia objected when the high court refused to hear a challenge to a Chicago suburb's assault weapons ban that was upheld by lower courts. Thomas said the justices should not stand by while lower courts relegate "the Second Amendment to a second-class right."

punaperson

Also from Justice Thomas's first comments at oral arguments in 10 years:

"...possession of a gun, which, at least as of now, is still a constitutional right."

Was this just a sardonic/snark comment, or was he telegraphing his concern about the known votes on the SCOTUS to overturn Heller/McDonald, or at least allow further infringing laws to stand? Scary.