^
Well, frankly sometimes I wonder if it's worthwhile posting political stuff here at all. Maybe it's my style or something, or the fact that I'm a mainlander, but I certainly expected some response to that decision.
Maybe that case is not as big a deal as I think, but other positive 2A legal stuff seems to be mostly ignored too... whether I post it or not. This, with the possible exception of the Baker case, where the site owner himself kept the discussion alive and where many of you know him personally.
I've noticed this for most of the 7 years I've been on this board. It's almost as if the fact that the historically relatively easy living of tropical and subtropical islands, with food readily available from both land and sea, and with mostly mild weather, has resulted in a cultural "shaka," a willingness to let things go, an "it's all good" attitude.
It's almost as if the easy living for centuries has dulled down that sense of independence and the "don't tread on me" fire in the belly attitude necessary to win back some of the freedoms that "Authority" has taken away... at least for most of the Hawaiian population. Maybe it's a result of the plantation culture? Or the Royalty structure of days past? Whatever.
I don't know. I don't think I'm being a crybaby here, and I don't care if I have 100 posts or 10,000 posts or 10 likes or 100 likes, but it just seems to me that Hawaiians don't care that much about how the laws have subjugated them... or keeps them subjugated.
This is not to say that I'm going to pull a drama queen bit and withdraw from the site, but I'm just commenting on the excessively (to me) easygoing attitude of the general Hawaiian population. Maybe that's just good for tourism, though, and I'm misinterpreting the situation altogether.
Terry, 230RN