Panos Prevedouros, a frequent rail critic and a University of Hawaii civil engineering professor
He's mostly knowledgeable, I'll give him that. That said, he knows enough about structural engineering to be dangerous and mostly spins things out of proportion, which is typical of politicians.
Cracking in concrete construction is nothing new. If anyone can produce concrete that doesn't crack, they will be richer than the King of Indonesia. . . Yeah, some of that stuff is disturbing and if properly contracted, the contractor should be taking care of that without additional cost. The reality is that they will roll that cost into other change orders, which is really where HART and others are failing. That said, it is really tough business to negotiate that stuff, but not impossible.
One thing with the rail is that it is super visible to the public. Thousands drive by it every day and see everything. You should see what kinds of flaws that occur in typical building construction and ends up being covered up with some spackle (essentially).
I was never for the rail in the current version. That said, I see a lot of attacks on things that the contractors are actually doing ok on, like the actual construction.