Take Action kicks Ass !

How do we set up something like this ?
Anyone know how ?

2AHawaii. Figure this out so we can do it from this forum.
(Easy for me to say.) ]

GOA does it too on a National basis. I am sure it is a feature that can be worked out with those who set up forums
I use it all the time and I know the letters are getting there as I keep getting the canned responses. GOA sets it up so that you can write your own or modify theirs to fit your circumstances, or tone them
down a bit.
Anyway, I sent mine to all sens and reps, a personal to my Rep Sam Kong.
We gotta fight together.
Aloha
Gordy

Done!
and shared on social media. 

I never wrote anything at all about "how it should be" (or "shouldn't be").

Why should "our side" have to produce enormous numbers to hold sway, while "the other side" need not produce such numbers, or any numbers at all (according to you) and that "no (or almost no) visible public support" rules the roost?

Please explain that in the context of "consent of the governed". Or any context at all.

YOU'RE the one writing about how more gun owners SHOULD get involved, yet you have no plan at all except to "bitch and moan" about it and tell them they should be "ashamed" to not do what you want them to do, even though there is no evidence that if they did what you attempt to shame them in to doing that it would have a beneficial outcome. You're hypothesizing about "how it should be" ("if "enough" of you were "active" legislation would go our way") without any data to support your claim.

Show me the percentage of gun owners in the voting age population of every Hawaii legislative district. Show me the percentage of gun owners compared to non-gun owners that are registered voters in every Hawaii legislative district. Now, show me how you're going to get whatever percentage of them you claim is necessary to accomplish your goals if they are active, active. Otherwise all you're doing is "bitching and moaning" and spewing hypotheticals about "how it should be".

Aloha e

Thanks for your email. I do support Second Amendment Rights and voted in opposition to SB 2629 in the Judiciary and Labor Committee on March 30th. However, I did vote in favor of HB 2632 and HB 625 after weighing all the testimony.

I’ll keep your input in mind as these bills continue being debated here at the Legislature.

Me ke aloha pumehana,
 
Senator Mike Gabbard

---

To which i replied

Thank you for taking the time to respond, I do appreciate your support with your opposition to SB 2629,
I would like to once again share my thoughts on HB 2632 and HB 265

HB 2632 is very vague and over reaching and would result in the loss of rights for receiving hospitalization not requiring diagnosis and has no opportunity for due process or appeal, The way the bill is written whilst some one is receiving care the police will be able to seize firearms immediately from a persons home without warrant or order from a court, Even whilst under treatment which would result in medical clearance at its end.
Any removal of rights should be the result of diagnosis and due process, not solely on the bases of receiving care.

HB 265 ll, Loss of rights is meant for our most serious of crimes in the cases of stalking and harassment their is already laws in place that would protect the victims.  Hawaii's TRO laws remove a persons right for a period for up to 1 year when evidence is presented that shows that they pose a risk to another safety.

Thank you for your support and i hope moving forward you will continue to do so.

---