My Response to Hawaii on Target I Have Provided Proof (Read 62506 times)

surfer22

Re: My Response to Hawaii on Target I Have Provided Proof
« Reply #100 on: July 01, 2016, 10:10:42 PM »
What's wrong with being an ordained minister ?
I am and im licensed by the star to marry people as well

I don't think there's anything wrong with being an ordained minister. I do think it's very ironic and somewhat a joke that guy like Darin, with a history of lying and shady practices, is an ordained minister.

London808

Re: My Response to Hawaii on Target I Have Provided Proof
« Reply #101 on: July 01, 2016, 10:31:34 PM »
I don't think there's anything wrong with being an ordained minister. I do think it's very ironic and somewhat a joke that guy like Darin, with a history of lying and shady practices, is an ordained minister.

Its an online form and a processing fee, You can ordain your toaster if you felt the need
"Mr. Roberts is a bit of a fanatic, he has previously sued HPD about gun registration issues." : Major Richard Robinson 2016

surfer22

Re: My Response to Hawaii on Target I Have Provided Proof
« Reply #102 on: July 02, 2016, 01:56:36 AM »
Its an online form and a processing fee, You can ordain your toaster if you felt the need

That's cool I guess.  I still think it's ironic for a guy that's sounds like a professional liar to be a minister. Somebody else posted a picture of him doing some kind of prison ministry. I just think it's funny is all. I have nothing against you or any other ordained minister, toaster, etc though lol

Flapp_Jackson

Re: My Response to Hawaii on Target I Have Provided Proof
« Reply #103 on: July 02, 2016, 02:13:22 AM »
That's cool I guess.  I still think it's ironic for a guy that's sounds like a professional liar to be a minister. Somebody else posted a picture of him doing some kind of prison ministry. I just think it's funny is all. I have nothing against you or any other ordained minister, toaster, etc though lol

I grew up around evangelical preachers who often got caught living the high life of sin!  They were taking donations sometimes from those least able to afford tit, all in the name of doing "God's work".  So, I'm not too surprised when a "man of the cloth" gets caught breaking the law -- both God's and man's!

I guess they are hoping they can ask for forgiveness before they depart this world?   >:D
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

jcw556

Re: My Response to Hawaii on Target I Have Provided Proof
« Reply #104 on: July 02, 2016, 05:37:48 AM »
"I guess they are hoping they can ask for forgiveness before they depart this world?"

I'm hoping Darin gets to practice in front of an earthly judge first. And I'm a little surprised there hasn't already been news of his arrest.

PeaShooter

Re: My Response to Hawaii on Target I Have Provided Proof
« Reply #105 on: July 02, 2016, 09:09:50 AM »
I paid with a visa credit card and recently decided to submit a "transaction dispute" I provided all the info and email history of attempts to contact them.
You didn't really need to send them all that stuff, even if they asked for it. All it really takes to start a transaction dispute is your word that you received nothing, or received something that was not as described. Credit card companies generally side with the buyer and will restore your funds when you file the complaint. Depending on the timing of the complaint and other factors, they are required by law to do so. It's only if the seller afterwards files a dispute, that providing such information becomes helpful, but chargebacks rarely get to that stage.

Many honest sellers would not even bother disputing a fraudulent buyer chargeback, instead they just refuse to do business with that buyer in the future.

surfer22

Re: My Response to Hawaii on Target I Have Provided Proof
« Reply #106 on: July 04, 2016, 11:39:47 AM »
You didn't really need to send them all that stuff, even if they asked for it. All it really takes to start a transaction dispute is your word that you received nothing, or received something that was not as described. Credit card companies generally side with the buyer and will restore your funds when you file the complaint. Depending on the timing of the complaint and other factors, they are required by law to do so. It's only if the seller afterwards files a dispute, that providing such information becomes helpful, but chargebacks rarely get to that stage.

Many honest sellers would not even bother disputing a fraudulent buyer chargeback, instead they just refuse to do business with that buyer in the future.

Maybe he didn't NEED to but I can definitely understand the reasoning behind him sending that info. All it can do is help to back up his story.