What impact does this ruling have on pro gun states within the 9th circuit? Arizona, Alaska, Guam, Nevada, Idaho, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and Washington State all fall under the 9th. Thanks!

What impact does this ruling have on pro gun states within the 9th circuit? Arizona, Alaska, Guam, Nevada, Idaho, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and Washington State all fall under the 9th. Thanks!

Unless president elect appoints some judges that will actually uphold the constitution, get ready to surrender your firearms.

Unless president elect appoints some judges that will actually uphold the constitution, get ready to surrender your firearms.

It pisses me off that these tyrants are referencing law predateing the bill of rights and constitution. How is this even allowed? How can we impeach these justices?

We had two sets of Founding Fathers: the 1770s set who kicked off the Revolutionary War, and the 1780s set who agitated for a constitutional convention in 1787. Except for a few persons, they were different men -- and with different agenda.

Jefferson did not write the Constitution, but most Americans seem to believe that it was a Jeffersonian product as his Declaration of Independence.

If you've ever wondered how we came to have a leviathan federal government that was supposed to remain small and defined -- Hologram of Liberty will explain what happened.

The 1997 edition is sold out and out of print, and was replaced in June by the 2012 second edition (ISBN 1888766131), which has 100 new pages, and thoroughly covers the 10th Amendment, Firearms Freedom Acts, Obamacare, and comparisons between other constitutions.

That brought his 1997 classic fully up to date, and now you can also enjoy it on Kindle!

For all those who have the out-of-print 1997 edition of Hologram of Liberty, here is a synopsis of what is new in the 2012 edition:

Introduction updated, with a farewell to political book writing

Chapters 1-4 no-very few changes

Chapter 5 commerce clause discussion removed for Chapter 11

Chapter 6 separate U.S. constitution theory removed (too arcane and speculative)

Chapter 7 no changes

Chapter 8 no changes

Chapter 9 several changes/updates as needed

Chapter 10 much added: 16th Amendment and income taxation, freedom money, reining in the public corporations

Chapter 11 full treatment of 10th Amendment vs. the commerce clause (discussed is my then forecasted SCOTUS ruling on Obamacare)lots of treatment of the states' Firearms Freedom Acts

Chapter 12 much detail on the looming Constitutional Convention, history and future

Chapter 13 quotes from many constitutions from Swiss to CSA to Newstates

Chapter 14 which authors have embraced/rejected my coup d'etat theory since 1997?

Chapter 15 And Now, Back to Reality . . . (much added to this 1997 chapter)

Index fully redone, with 1,2,3 pagination (vs. 3/7 and 10/6 workbook style)

Result isn't surprising, I don't think anyone here realistically expected it to go our way.  Next step would be to pass a Federal CCW reciprocity next year.

What actions can we take at this point? Petition, contacting legislators?

From an L A Times story (http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-concealed-carry-20160609-snap-story.html):

In a news conference Thursday afternoon, Sheriff Ed Prieto [whose case was litigated simultaneously with Peruta] said he felt “vindicated” after the ruling.

“In Yolo County, I think this is an effective policy and it seems to have been working effectively for years,” he said.  He later questioned why people would want to carry a weapon.

“How many times have you been attacked? How many friends do you have who have been attacked? I’m not talking about the exception,” he said. “I have five daughters and I can say I would not honestly give a weapon to any one of my daughters.”

* * * * *
In other words, if you are the "exception" and HAVE been attacked, shut up, because I don't want to talk about you. What he failed to say but also meant was "Even if you have been attacked, a firearm would not have helped, because everyone is as stupid, ignorant, and as untrained as my daughters and the criminal would just have taken the gun away from you and used it against you. Just call 911 and get a big dog."

* * * * *
From California State Attorney Kamala Harris (likely soon to be U.S. Senator)(http://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-kamala-d-harris-issues-statement-following-ninth-circuit-ruling):

Attorney General Kamala D. Harris today issued the following statement on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in Peruta v. County of San Diego:

"The devastating impact gun violence has on our communities underscores the need for common sense gun safety laws. The court's decision is a victory for public safety and sensible gun safety laws.  The ruling ensures that local law enforcement leaders have the tools they need to protect public safety by determining who can carry loaded, concealed weapons in our communities."

* * * * *
I had to fix that one for her too!

"The devastating impact gun violence has on our communities underscores the need for common sense gun safety laws. The court's decision is a victory for public safety and sensible gun safety laws.  The ruling ensures that local law enforcement leaders have the tools they need to protect public safety by determining who LEGALLY can carry loaded, concealed weapons in our communities."

Everyone knows that not one single criminal has ever sought (nor will ever seek) permission from any law enforcement person or agency whether or not they may "carry loaded, concealed weapons in [their] communities". Who are the morons who believe even a single word of the crap spewed by the likes of Harris and Prieto? Oh, that's right, the majority of the people and voters in Hawaii and California...