Cleaned up the thread a bit (moderately).  This is a bit like whack-a-mole.

I may clean it up some more.  Pls keep it civil.

You have concluded there is not enough evidence to determine his motives. 

I conclude his statements are sufficient evidence to identify his motives.

Who are you going to believe?  The government, or the killer?  Your choice.

I have not reached a conclusion. This thread is exploring possibilities.

Also, I am not referring to government statements, I am referring to statements by people who knew the shooter, so no, it is not government statements vs killer's statements.

After initially expressing confidence that they could determine a motive, Lynch added, “I cannot tell you definitively that we will ever narrow it down to one motivation. People often act out of more than one motivation.”

“This was clearly an act of terror and an act of hate,” she said. “We will look at all motivations and hope to come to a conclusion there.”

-- AG Loretta Lynch, aka "The Government"

Iam not referring to Loretta Lynch's statements, I am referring to reports by the shooters wife, gay lover, and acquaintances.

Yes, I can tell you are ignoring the comments of the government .... even though you are posting the exact same words as your own!   

Since the shooting at an Orlando nightclub last week that left 49 people dead, reports have emerged that gunman Omar Mateen frequented the gay club, used gay dating apps and had gay lovers.

But the FBI has found no evidence so far to support claims by those who say Mateen had gay lovers or communicated on gay dating apps, several law enforcement officials said. 

Mateen, 29, told police negotiators he had carried out the shooting that began at 2 a.m. June 12 and ended, after a three-hour standoff, when he was killed by police.

He claimed the shooting was carried out in allegiance to the militant group Islamic State, as a message to halt U.S. bombing in Iraq and Syria.

Several Pulse regulars have come forward in the days since the shooting, claiming to have seen Mateen at the club or to have been contacted by him on the gay dating apps Grindr, Jack’d and Adam4Adam.

On Tuesday, Univision aired a report in which “Miguel,” a man wearing a disguise to conceal his identity, alleged he had sex with Mateen after meeting him on the gay dating app, Grindr. He said Mateen had sex with other men too, including a threesome with a Puerto Rican who allegedly told Mateen, after having had unprotected sex with him, that he was HIV positive.

But investigators do not consider the man’s account credible, according to one senior law enforcement official with access to the investigation.

FBI investigators say they have found no evidence that Orlando shooter had gay lovers

-- LA TIMES

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-orlando-gay-fbi-20160623-snap-story.html

And what about his wife and acquaintances?

You seem awfully intent on not letting the shooter be a homosexual.... interesting.

And what about his wife and acquaintances?

You seem awfully intent on not letting the shooter be a homosexual.... interesting.

What about the FBI investigation which included interviewing his wife and acquaintances? You seem awfully intent on making the shooter be a homosexual.... interesting.

As usual, you are asking questions and have NO ANSWERS.

The one Fap posted? It doesn't mention the wife.

If I knew the answer, I wouldn't ask the question. 
I am not a mind reader, I don't know your motivations.

Are you really suggesting that because a particular article doesn't specifically mention that his wife has been questioned by the FBI that the FBI in conducting over 500 interviews thus far neglected to interview the wife? That article doesn't mention about 496 other interviews. Or that the FBI is covering up what the wife said? Or that the FBI erroneously found her information to be "not credible"? Or what exactly?

My motivations are not the subject of this thread.

Yours, however, seem to be the same on all threads ... arguing and trolling.

Says the man who does it repeatedly.