I had a really long reply I just had to delete for liability purposes.
This is even pushing the limit and is against the recommendation of counsel to just remain silent on the issue.
I am only speaking for OGC, but this may likely reflect the position of other LGS, you would have to ask them.
Please understand that due to the close working relationship that most of the LGS must maintain with the State and Federal government, we simply cannot even be seen to be affiliated with a legal challenge of this nature, however strongly we feel about it personally or how much it would be in our self interest to have rapback eliminated or repealed.
The actions that can be taken against an FFL by the State/Fed Govt are varied and can be executed almost effortlessly and can only be fought with super expensive, likely to fail, legal action.
What you may see as a challenge to your rights, hobby, or access to self defense is also our livelihood and our life's savings tied up in our inventories.
Our support could also HURT any legal action due to the obvious self interest involved should that be part of how the State defends their case, that "gun stores are behind the challenge because they want to sell more guns and don't care about Hawaii or the lives that are lost due to firearms related deaths"
It has to remain a grassroots issue of personal legal rights and whether they are being breached or not, not a campaign of those seeking profit.
We can only hope that the judicial branch will recognize rapback as the breach of rights that many of us believe it to be.