Well, one of them anyway. The other, Peruta, has a deadline of today (January 12, 2017), so we should learn shortly if they filed in that case or not, which they swore they would. This article is by Charles Nichols who has the open carry challenge to California's ban of open carry in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Mr. Nichols is not an advocate of concealed carry and believes that it is not protected by the Second Amendment and that Heller clearly states that open carry is the right protected by the Constitution.
http://newsblaze.com/business/legal/nra-drops-supreme-court-concealed-carry-appeal_72879/NRA Drops Supreme Court Concealed Carry AppealExcerpt:
January 5, 2017, was the deadline for National Rifle Association lawyer Paul Clement to file the cert petition in the case of Mckay v. Hutchens. A search of the Supreme Court online dockets turned up empty and neither the lawyers for Orange County Sheriff Hutchens nor the official California state NRA organization, the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA), responded to my inquiries.
The McKay appeal was the first of two concealed carry appeals out of California. Having missed its deadline to file its cert petition, the McKay appeal is now dead.
This leaves us with the second of the appeals, Peruta v. San Diego. The filing deadline in that case is January 12, 2017.
Should the NRA file its cert petition with the Supreme Court it really won’t matter if it is filed on time, the outcome is a foregone conclusion – Cert Denied.
Personally, I eagerly await the filing of the cert petition in the Peruta case and I am curious to see if any Amicus briefs are filed in support of the Supreme Court granting the cert petition. They should be amusing to read in a gallows humor sort of way.