All these liars getting caught now. It was only a matter of time. It's too bad that the lies were told and believed for so long that we have a whole generation of global warming believers.And no amount of truth and the liars getting caught red handed will change their minds. 

Yeah, facts are (mostly) irrelevant to the ideology and creation of the all-powerful state.

Well, I guess there are "coincidences"... but not likely ones in which all temperature data is "adjusted" in directions that "prove" anthropogenic catastrophic global climate change... from yesterday's American Thinker (lots of links to relevant claims):

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/07/green_delusions_and_the_wind_bully.html

Green Delusions and the Wind Bully

Green ideology is a collection of beliefs and superstitions that have been elevated into a religious cult.  The green cult is rife with contradictions and dogma.  For example, people in Wisconsin must eat fresh natural food, grown locally...and Wisconsin farmers are still working on the problem of growing lettuce in the snow.

The electric power grid is an essential of modern life.  Take it away, and the consequence would be mass extinction.  The greens are eager to tamper with the grid.  They want to substitute "clean" wind and solar electricity for the "dirty" nuclear, coal, and natural gas electricity.

The word "clean," like the word "green," has a new meaning.  Now "clean" means politically correct.  Something is clean if it conforms to green dogma.
. . . . . .
The green cult, especially the global warming branch, is like Lysenkoism in the former Soviet Union.  It is an official scientific ideology that scientists are expected to support.  The scientists who refuse to support it – there are many – suffer the consequences.  Most scientific dissenters keep quiet.  They have families to support.  Thankfully, there are signs that the official support is starting to crumble.

This article shoots down every lie and excuse Gore pontificates about his hypocritical elitist lifestyle. I remember the stats for his hypocritical energy use being publicized when the first "movie" came out (as the author here points out), but he's actually gotten worse. I'd like to see the stats on his calorie consumption as well because it looks like he's been taking in far more than his fair share in that arena too.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/02/exclusive-al-gores-home-devours-34-times-more-electricity-than-average-u-s-household/

Al Gore’s Home Devours 34 Times More Electricity Than Average U.S. Household

On Friday, Al Gore’s sequel to “An Inconvenient Truth” – “An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power” – arrives in movie theaters across the country. But there’s another inconvenient sequel worth noting and, like most sequels, this one is even worse than the original.

Gore’s hypocritical home energy use and “do as I say not as I do” lifestyle has plunged to embarrassing new depths.

In just this past year, Gore burned through enough energy to power the typical American household for more than 21 years, according to a new report by the National Center for Public Policy Research. The former vice president consumed 230,889 kilowatt hours (kWh) at his Nashville residence, which includes his home, pool and driveway entry gate electricity meters. A typical family uses an average of 10,812 kWh of electricity per year, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

It gets worse.

Last September alone, Gore devoured 30,993 kWh of electricity. That’s enough to power 34 average American homes for a month. Over the last 12 months, Gore used more electricity just heating his outdoor swimming pool than six typical homes use in a year.

.....Despite spending more than a quarter-million dollars on making his home more environmentally friendly, his energy consumption is higher than ever.

Those 33 solar panels generate about 12,000 kWh of electricity a year – way more than enough energy to power a typical American household. Gore is such an enormous energy hog, however, that his gigantic rooftop solar array produces just 5.7 percent of the electricity he uses in his home, or enough to power his home for a measly 21 days a year.

Gore even told the “TODAY Show” that his home uses 100 percent renewable energy, but that is an outright lie.

Just because Gore donates to the Green Power Switch program doesn’t mean he receives green energy at his home. Gore gets the same electricity every other Nashville resident receives – 87 percent of which comes from nuclear, coal and natural gas power plants. About 10 percent of Gore’s electricity comes from the TVA’s environmentally devastating dams. Only a puny 3 percent comes from renewable sources such as solar and wind.

Not counting the $432 a month Gore spends on his Green Power Switch indulgences, the green extremist shells out about $22,000 a year to pay his electric bills.

And we can expect more lies from the left.... 

Fido And Fluffy Are Ruining The Environment, UCLA Study Says
America's beloved dogs and cats play a significant role in causing global warming, according to a new study by UCLA.

https://patch.com/california/hollywood/fido-fluffy-are-hurting-environment-ucla-study-says

When it comes to global warming, Fido and Fluffy are part of the problem, a new study by UCLA indicates.

Most cat or dog lovers would say they can't imagine living in a world without pets, but as the threat of global warming increases, environmentally conscious pet lovers may need to make some tough choices, according to the study.

Pet ownership in the United States creates about 64 million tons of carbon dioxide a year, UCLA researchers found. That's the equivalent of driving 13.6 million cars for a year. The problem lies with the meat-filled diets of kitties and pooches, according to the study by UCLA geography professor Gregory Okin.

Dogs and cats are responsible for 25 to 30 percent of the impacts of meat production in the United States, said Orkin. Compared to a plant-based diet, meat production "requires more energy, land and water and has greater environmental consequences in terms of erosion, pesticides and waste," the study found.

And what goes in, must come out. In terms of waste, Okin noted, feeding pets also leads to about 5.1 million tons of feces every year, roughly equivalent to the total trash production of Massachusetts.

Fido And Fluffy Are Ruining The Environment, UCLA Study Says
America's beloved dogs and cats play a significant role in causing global warming, according to a new study by UCLA.

https://patch.com/california/hollywood/fido-fluffy-are-hurting-environment-ucla-study-says

When it comes to global warming, Fido and Fluffy are part of the problem, a new study by UCLA indicates.

Most cat or dog lovers would say they can't imagine living in a world without pets, but as the threat of global warming increases, environmentally conscious pet lovers may need to make some tough choices, according to the study.

Pet ownership in the United States creates about 64 million tons of carbon dioxide a year, UCLA researchers found. That's the equivalent of driving 13.6 million cars for a year. The problem lies with the meat-filled diets of kitties and pooches, according to the study by UCLA geography professor Gregory Okin.

Dogs and cats are responsible for 25 to 30 percent of the impacts of meat production in the United States, said Orkin. Compared to a plant-based diet, meat production "requires more energy, land and water and has greater environmental consequences in terms of erosion, pesticides and waste," the study found.

And what goes in, must come out. In terms of waste, Okin noted, feeding pets also leads to about 5.1 million tons of feces every year, roughly equivalent to the total trash production of Massachusetts.

Al Gore should put his two dogs to sleep to show he is all in on this climate change BS. 

Are Climate Warriors Giving Up?

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/08/are_climate_warriors_giving_up.html

Climate change warriors have transitioned from being motivated and enthusiastic to despondent and fatalistic. A Washington Post article this week headlined, “We only have a 5 percent chance of avoiding ‘dangerous’ global warming.” It looks to me like they have thrown in the towel. We are beyond the point of no return, whatever that means. The apocalypse is imminent.

Does that mean we can stop with the climate change talk and get on to repealing Obamacare, building the wall and cutting taxes? Doubtful. Despite the climate movement’s new fatalism, don’t expect them to give up and move on. Being 3 touchdowns down at the two-minute warning, they want to keep the starters in hoping for a miracle. Rather than accepting defeat and looking toward the next game.
.....
What if the scientists cited by the Washington Post are wrong in their predictions? Or as one of the scientists admitted, “I think it’s possible that the future might be completely different.” No kidding. Most of us know from first-hand experience that the future is often not what we expected or predicted.
.....
ABC News in 2008 told viewers that by 2015, New York City would be under several feet of water due to rising sea levels. As well as $9 per gallon gas and $13 per gallon milk. Not quite.

Bob Marley said it best back in 1980:

The Real Situation

Check out the real situation:
Nation war against nation.
Where did it all begin?
When will it end?
...(chorus)
Give them an inch, they take a yard;
Give them a yard, they take a mile (ooh);
Once a man and twice a child
And everything is just for a while.
It seems like: total destruction the only solution,
And there ain't no use: no one can stop them now.
There ain't no use: no one can stop them now;

Bob Marley said it best back in 1980:

What about Barry McGuire back in 1965 (song written by P.F. Sloan in 1964)?

But you tell me over and over and over again my friend,
Ah, you don't believe we're on the eve of destruction.

What about Barry McGuire back in 1965 (song written by P.F. Sloan in 1964)?

But you tell me over and over and over again my friend,
Ah, you don't believe we're on the eve of destruction.

I'm more in tune with Jonathan Edwards' Sunshine  (1971)....

How much does it cost? I'll buy it
The time is all we've lost, I'll try it
But he can't even run his own life
I'll be damned if he'll run mine, Sunshine

  

Some radio stations refused to play it or censored the words "be damned" to avoid FCC problems.  Ironic, considering the message.

I always think of Ten Years After lyrics as a fitting statement for today:

Every where is freaks and hairies,
dykes and fairies;
Tell me where is sanity?

Of course, I would change "Hairies" to Trannies

I always think of Ten Years After lyrics as a fitting statement for today:

Every where is freaks and hairies,
dykes and fairies;
Tell me where is sanity?

Of course, I would change "Hairies" to Trannies

The irony is, they AREN'T everywhere.  They are such a small portion of the population, but they are celebrated and given special attention to make it seem like they are "everywhere.".

Gore's "movie" "documentary" sequel to "An Inconvenient Truth",  “An Inconvenient Sequel”, has flopped at the box office it's opening weekend. Let the excuses begin.

http://www.climatedepot.com/2017/08/07/under-performance-gores-sequel-comes-in-dismal-15th-at-box-office-gore-fans-allege-film-was-sabotaged-by-paramount/

Gore's "movie" "documentary" sequel to "An Inconvenient Truth",  “An Inconvenient Sequel”, has flopped at the box office it's opening weekend. Let the excuses begin.

http://www.climatedepot.com/2017/08/07/under-performance-gores-sequel-comes-in-dismal-15th-at-box-office-gore-fans-allege-film-was-sabotaged-by-paramount/

‘This was not supposed to happen’: Gore’s sequel comes in dismal 15th at box office – Gore fans allege film ‘sabotaged’ by Paramount

Climate activists in shock at Gore sequel bombing at box office: 'This was not supposed to happen'
'Al Gore Gets Ripped Off Again'
'He should have demanded a recount.'
Gore fans reduced to blaming the distributor. 'A botched strategy by Paramount Pictures effectively sabotaged the nationwide release' of Gore's sequel.
Gore had urged followers to ‘fill theaters’ to send message to ‘Trump and the other climate deniers’

is he gonna write a book about it like hillary?

Global Warming Hoax Exposed: Australia Weather Bureau Tampered With Climate Numbers

http://www.dailywire.com/news/19211/global-warming-hoax-exposed-australia-weather-john-nolte?utm_source=dwemail&utm_medium=email&utm_content=083117news&utm_campaign=position1

This article discusses a paper by the same climate scientist mentioned above in the article posted by Inspector. So I guess we can discount her, despite her credentials, as a "denier". Well, except for all the damn pesky "facts" that support her research and consequent conclusions...

[From author of the article, not the scientist]: "Don’t ever let anyone tell you that the climate change debate is over, and that the science on the matter is settled. Don’t let them fool you into thinking that there’s a strict consensus among scientists regarding global warming (and even if there was a 100% consensus, just because a lot of people believe something doesn’t mean it’s true). The people promoting the theory of man-made global warming have been caught lying too many times for us to blindly follow them."

New Climate Study Throws A Wrench In The Global Warming Debate: “Our New Technical Paper… Will Likely Be Ignored”

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/new-climate-study-throws-a-wrench-in-the-global-warming-debate-our-new-technical-paper-will-likely-be-ignored_08232017

Jennifer Marohasy, a scientist with a rather long list of impressive credentials, which includes the founding of The Climate Modeling Laboratory, opens her startling climate report with a dose of reality. “Our new technical paper … will likely be ignored,” she writes at The Spectator Australia.

She goes on to explain why, “Because after applying the latest big data technique to six 2,000 year-long proxy-temperature series we cannot confirm that recent warming is anything but natural – what might have occurred anyway, even if there was no industrial revolution.”

"Typical of most such temperature series, it zigzags up and down while showing two rising trends: the first peaks about 1200 AD and corresponds with a period known as the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), while the second peaks in 1980 and then shows decline. …

There are, however, multiple lines of evidence indicating it was about a degree warmer across Europe during the MWP – corresponding with the 1200 AD rise in our Northern Hemisphere composite. In fact, there are oodles of published technical papers based on proxy records that provide a relatively warm temperature profile for this period."

Couldn't happen to a more deserving elitist blowhard liar...

Al Gore Outsold On Kindle By An E-Book Debunking ‘An Inconvenient Sequel’

http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/04/al-gore-outsold-on-kindle-by-an-e-book-debunking-an-inconvenient-sequel/

Former Vice President Al Gore’s new book is lagging in sales, and, in fact, is being outsold on Amazon Kindle by an e-book debunking many of the claims made in “An Inconvenient Sequel.”

Climatologist Roy Spencer authored an e-book “An Inconvenient Deception” to critique the “bad science, bad policy and some outright falsehoods” in Gore’s latest movie and book, which were released in August. Now, it’s ranked higher in Amazon’s Kindle store.

“There are three big weaknesses in Gore’s new movie: science, economics and energy policy,” Spencer, a noted skeptic of catastrophic global warming, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

The e-book published to accompany Gore’s film is ranked #51,031 for purchases in the Kindle Store, according to Amazon.com. Spencer’s book is ranked #1,201 for Kindle Store purchases.

Here's a brief (three minute) interview with climatologist Roy Spencer, author of the above mentioned book, "An Inconvenient Deception" (Spencer actually believes possibly 50% of the carbon dioxide increase in the atmosphere in anthropogenic, but that even with that increase the temperatures are not rising anywhere near as fast as the models predict, and that's a problem because the models are what are being used to justify draconian restrictions on "energy policy"):

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/09/06/al-gore-inconvenient-sequel-climate-change-debunked-scientist-roy-spencer