Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again (Read 156593 times)

Inspector

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #100 on: May 08, 2017, 06:10:06 AM »
Global Quackery: Earth Has Not Warmed For Past 19 Years, New Study Finds

http://www.dailywire.com/news/16154/global-quackery-earth-has-not-warmed-past-19-years-joseph-curl

When you combine the article I posted in the previous post with this article and the fact that climate scientists refuse to state what percentage of climate change that man is responsible for, it should become apparent that those who believe in the climate change myth that they have been lied to. And not only have they been lied to but the science that they so dearly cling on to as proof has all been bought and paid for by the left/progressive and Socialist nations along with the George Soros' of the world.

Boy, I hope you millennials and omnipotent beings have a warm coat!!!  :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

punaperson

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #101 on: May 08, 2017, 07:11:07 AM »
Global Quackery: Earth Has Not Warmed For Past 19 Years, New Study Finds
Well, that's why they've had to change their terminology from 1970s "Coming Ice Age" to 1990s+ " (Man Made) Global Warming" to 2010s " (Man Made) Climate Change". They are admitting that they don't have a clue what is going to happen to the earth's climate, but whatever it is, heating, cooling, staying the same, it is BAD, VERY BAD... and therefore governments must intervene in every aspect of human life and productivity and control everything  (See: building codes, factory energy use and "pollution controls", etc., etc., etc.). I'm sure they know exactly what they are doing... it's just not what they say they are doing... but surely the ends justify the means and it's all for our own good.  :crazy:

Inspector

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #102 on: May 08, 2017, 07:30:29 AM »
Well, that's why they've had to change their terminology from 1970s "Coming Ice Age" to 1990s+ " (Man Made) Global Warming" to 2010s " (Man Made) Climate Change". They are admitting that they don't have a clue what is going to happen to the earth's climate, but whatever it is, heating, cooling, staying the same, it is BAD, VERY BAD... and therefore governments must intervene in every aspect of human life and productivity and control everything  (See: building codes, factory energy use and "pollution controls", etc., etc., etc.). I'm sure they know exactly what they are doing... it's just not what they say they are doing... but surely the ends justify the means and it's all for our own good.  :crazy:
I just want to point out that not all building codes are all bad since the major purpose of my existence as an inspector to protect the public by verifying that the construction is being performed correctly, safely, all for public safety.  :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

drck1000

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #103 on: May 08, 2017, 08:27:27 AM »
I just want to point out that not all building codes are all bad since the major purpose of my existence as an inspector to protect the public by verifying that the construction is being performed correctly, safely, all for public safety:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
I can attest to that being the case with structural portions of the building code.   :thumbsup:

rklapp

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #104 on: May 08, 2017, 08:31:05 AM »
Yahh! Freedom and justice shall always prevail over tyranny, Babysitter Girl!
https://ronsreloading.wordpress.com/

drck1000

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #105 on: May 08, 2017, 08:37:47 AM »
They were talking on NPR this morning about how weather models predict snow to disappear from Mauna Kea and Mauna Loa by the end of the year.  So I decided to look up the studies behind that discussion and found a few.  Just thought it was interesting to see the scientific information behind that discussion as opposed to the opinions and conclusions made based on that data. 

Quote
Snow in Hawai'i: What does the future hold?
Date:May 4, 2017
Source:University of Hawaii at Manoa
Summary:Researchers, led by climate modelers, used satellite images to quantify recent snow cover distributions patterns on Mauna Kea and Mauna Loa, Hawai'i. They developed a regional climate model to simulate the present-day snowfalls and then to project future Hawaiian snowfalls. Their results indicate that the two volcano summits are typically snow-covered at least 20 days each winter, but that the snow cover will nearly disappear by the end of the century.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170504161515.htm

punaperson

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #106 on: May 08, 2017, 08:51:50 AM »
One person's view...



https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/05/07/multinational-financial-interests-demand-trump-adhere-to-paris-climate-accord/

Multinational Financial Interests Demand Trump Adhere To Paris Climate Accord…

Posted on May 7, 2017

Excerpts:
   
Behind the social justice interventionism of the Birkenstock wearing Brangelina Peacenik useful-idiot-crowd, there’s the group of multinational financial interests who play the strings on the idiots.

Multinational corporations and billionaire financiers use climate change as a tool toward furtherance of collected global wealth.  Their strategy is quite simple, and has been played out for several cycles.  Create an institutional trade instrument (housing financial bubble example), control it, drive the pricing to an apex and reap the financial rewards.

Their expressed holy grail for human control is a global tax on all people more commonly known as a “carbon-trading tax”.  A planetary tax on personage.  Various religious groups have a financial method to purchase entry to heaven called ‘indulgences’.  Hence the comparison of Climate Change to a religion is exponentially accurate.

The “Carbon Trading” fundamental financial instrument is the foundational block of the financial interests behind modern climate change.  The latest exhibition of a decades long series of international construct was the Paris Climate Change agreement.

Inspector

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #107 on: May 08, 2017, 08:54:57 AM »
I imagine this must live in infamy for building inspectors.

https://lasvegassun.com/news/2014/dec/16/opening-arguments-begin-trial-over-flawed-strip-ho/
I didn't read the article but I know a little something about this project. I actually know the special inspectors that came in after the original special inspectors and the company they worked for was fired from the project. The inspectors I know were the ones that reported all of the items that were visibly wrong and as things were being demolished they reported on how things were built incorrectly. I can't talk too much about what I was told but I was told that the original inspectors lost their licenses and won't be able to work legally as an inspector in the US any more. I don't know if anything came of the company they worked for. Just know, no matter what happened on this project, the general contractor and effected sub contractors are responsible for the incorrect work.

DRCK - This was a PT project, BTW.  :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

drck1000

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #108 on: May 08, 2017, 09:22:06 AM »
I didn't read the article but I know a little something about this project. I actually know the special inspectors that came in after the original special inspectors and the company they worked for was fired from the project. The inspectors I know were the ones that reported all of the items that were visibly wrong and as things were being demolished they reported on how things were built incorrectly. I can't talk too much about what I was told but I was told that the original inspectors lost their licenses and won't be able to work legally as an inspector in the US any more. I don't know if anything came of the company they worked for. Just know, no matter what happened on this project, the general contractor and effected sub contractors are responsible for the incorrect work.

DRCK - This was a PT project, BTW.  :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Wasn't able to access the file yet.  I'll have a read later.

I was asked to do contract inspection in Vegas by a college buddy.  They were growing so fast that the design and inspection support side couldn't keep up.  I think that bubble burst a while back, but it was awfully tempting. 

rklapp

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #109 on: May 08, 2017, 03:09:11 PM »
I didn't read the article but I know a little something about this project. I actually know the special inspectors that came in after the original special inspectors and the company they worked for was fired from the project. The inspectors I know were the ones that reported all of the items that were visibly wrong and as things were being demolished they reported on how things were built incorrectly. I can't talk too much about what I was told but I was told that the original inspectors lost their licenses and won't be able to work legally as an inspector in the US any more. I don't know if anything came of the company they worked for. Just know, no matter what happened on this project, the general contractor and effected sub contractors are responsible for the incorrect work.
DRCK - This was a PT project, BTW.  :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Perini disbanded due to the fatalities and the Harmon fiasco. Converse is still around as far as I know. This article has pictures of the poorly wrapped columns. It might be able to support the existing floors but who would ever give them liability insurance, so down it went.

https://lasvegassun.com/news/2009/jul/01/harmon-inspector-lacked-experience/
Yahh! Freedom and justice shall always prevail over tyranny, Babysitter Girl!
https://ronsreloading.wordpress.com/

Inspector

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #110 on: May 08, 2017, 06:45:37 PM »
Perini disbanded due to the fatalities and the Harmon fiasco. Converse is still around as far as I know. This article has pictures of the poorly wrapped columns. It might be able to support the existing floors but who would ever give them liability insurance, so down it went.

https://lasvegassun.com/news/2009/jul/01/harmon-inspector-lacked-experience/
Big projects like that need experienced inspectors. Especially experience with dealing with ironworkers/rodbusters. My gut feeling in this situation is that the General and subs ran roughshod over the inspectors. The inspectors didn't communicate with the county inspectors who would have put a stop to it immediately. My friends told me the original inspectors new and poorly trained.
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

rklapp

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #111 on: May 08, 2017, 07:52:38 PM »
Big projects like that need experienced inspectors. Especially experience with dealing with ironworkers/rodbusters. My gut feeling in this situation is that the General and subs ran roughshod over the inspectors. The inspectors didn't communicate with the county inspectors who would have put a stop to it immediately. My friends told me the original inspectors new and poorly trained.
Back in 2008 if you didn't have a $1B building project on the Strip, you were nobody. Then the market burst and MGM breathed a huge sigh of relief when the column problems came to life and they could blame Perini, et al on why they had to stop the project and eventually demolish the building. I have a friend who's a director at MGM and they had to take back everyone's pay raise in 2010 so they could pay the bank for the City Center project. Now they've made non-guests have to pay at the MGM parking garages and valet so you can't visit for free if you're a local or hop around if your a tourist. I went back to Vegas last February and I'm glad to be here despite the cheaper cost of living in the desert (not to mention CCSC).
Yahh! Freedom and justice shall always prevail over tyranny, Babysitter Girl!
https://ronsreloading.wordpress.com/

punaperson

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #112 on: May 09, 2017, 06:39:08 AM »
Speaking of "the paid climate change" mongers being "at it again"!

A fool's errand: Al Gore's $15 trillion carbon tax

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a-fools-errand-al-gores-15-trillion-carbon-tax/article/2622479

Excerpt:

Al Gore wants to reverse modernity and save the world from itself through an elimination of its fossil-fuel-based energy system. During the final week of April, his newly created Energy Transitions Commission released a document setting forth a fool's-errand pathway to "decarbonize" the world's energy system.

If this sounds familiar, it is. Gore's plan features a new, sophisticated, and expensive public-relations campaign, but it's all based on his views on carbon dioxide first broached in his 1992 book Earth in the Balance, which he reissued in 2000 for his failed presidential campaign. The subsequent efforts made by Gore during the past 25 years have transformed little from their genesis, and he remains as tragically wrong today as he was when he first surfaced as an opponent of everything linked to carbon-dioxide.

If you scroll through the verbiage surrounding the document, you will find the core policy recommendation is a massive, punishing carbon tax. Gore would start the tax at $50 per ton, which would increase to $100 per ton over time, essentially destroying the market for continued robust development of the world's fossil-fuel base. Our economic growth and personal well-being depends on robust fossil-fuel use, so Gore's plan would destroy these as well.

But, don't worry! The all-in estimated cost to re-engineer humanity is only a mere $15 trillion—enough money to give every man, woman, and child in the United States more than $46,000.

Inspector

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #113 on: May 09, 2017, 06:43:23 AM »
Speaking of "the paid climate change" mongers being "at it again"!

A fool's errand: Al Gore's $15 trillion carbon tax

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a-fools-errand-al-gores-15-trillion-carbon-tax/article/2622479

Excerpt:

Al Gore wants to reverse modernity and save the world from itself through an elimination of its fossil-fuel-based energy system. During the final week of April, his newly created Energy Transitions Commission released a document setting forth a fool's-errand pathway to "decarbonize" the world's energy system.

If this sounds familiar, it is. Gore's plan features a new, sophisticated, and expensive public-relations campaign, but it's all based on his views on carbon dioxide first broached in his 1992 book Earth in the Balance, which he reissued in 2000 for his failed presidential campaign. The subsequent efforts made by Gore during the past 25 years have transformed little from their genesis, and he remains as tragically wrong today as he was when he first surfaced as an opponent of everything linked to carbon-dioxide.

If you scroll through the verbiage surrounding the document, you will find the core policy recommendation is a massive, punishing carbon tax. Gore would start the tax at $50 per ton, which would increase to $100 per ton over time, essentially destroying the market for continued robust development of the world's fossil-fuel base. Our economic growth and personal well-being depends on robust fossil-fuel use, so Gore's plan would destroy these as well.

But, don't worry! The all-in estimated cost to re-engineer humanity is only a mere $15 trillion—enough money to give every man, woman, and child in the United States more than $46,000.


You should have never posted this. Now the Omnipotent One (Impotent One?) will think this will really work as he prays at the alter of Al Gore.  :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

drck1000

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #114 on: May 09, 2017, 07:12:37 AM »
I didn't read the article but I know a little something about this project. I actually know the special inspectors that came in after the original special inspectors and the company they worked for was fired from the project. The inspectors I know were the ones that reported all of the items that were visibly wrong and as things were being demolished they reported on how things were built incorrectly. I can't talk too much about what I was told but I was told that the original inspectors lost their licenses and won't be able to work legally as an inspector in the US any more. I don't know if anything came of the company they worked for. Just know, no matter what happened on this project, the general contractor and effected sub contractors are responsible for the incorrect work.

DRCK - This was a PT project, BTW.  :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Finally was able to read the article, albeit a pretty quick read. 

Tutor Perini huh?  Hmm. . .

So seems like the "flaws" were all in the inspection?  As in not a design flaw?  As a former consultant, it is my experience that we ALWAYS get pulled into disputes like this. 

Since this was a private job, I assume the inspectors were hired by the owner or true third party.  The reason why I ask is that many projects in different jurisdictions these days are going to Contractor Quality Control.  I won't get into the details and they whys they are going to this method, but it's like letting the rats guard the cheese. . .

punaperson

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #115 on: May 09, 2017, 07:14:10 AM »
You should have never posted this. Now the Omnipotent One (Impotent One?) will think this will really work as he prays at the alter of Al Gore.  :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Look at that picture. Read about Gore's personal enormously huge "carbon footprint". Anyone who worships anything having to do with that guy is... uh... something less than wonderful. Of course that means many millions of people.... no doubt including many of Hawaii's everpresent "progressives".

Inspector

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #116 on: May 15, 2017, 07:06:43 AM »
 :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

Inspector

SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

omnigun

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #118 on: May 26, 2017, 01:35:15 PM »
Speaking of "the paid climate change" mongers being "at it again"!

A fool's errand: Al Gore's $15 trillion carbon tax

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a-fools-errand-al-gores-15-trillion-carbon-tax/article/2622479

Excerpt:

Al Gore wants to reverse modernity and save the world from itself through an elimination of its fossil-fuel-based energy system. During the final week of April, his newly created Energy Transitions Commission released a document setting forth a fool's-errand pathway to "decarbonize" the world's energy system.

If this sounds familiar, it is. Gore's plan features a new, sophisticated, and expensive public-relations campaign, but it's all based on his views on carbon dioxide first broached in his 1992 book Earth in the Balance, which he reissued in 2000 for his failed presidential campaign. The subsequent efforts made by Gore during the past 25 years have transformed little from their genesis, and he remains as tragically wrong today as he was when he first surfaced as an opponent of everything linked to carbon-dioxide.

If you scroll through the verbiage surrounding the document, you will find the core policy recommendation is a massive, punishing carbon tax. Gore would start the tax at $50 per ton, which would increase to $100 per ton over time, essentially destroying the market for continued robust development of the world's fossil-fuel base. Our economic growth and personal well-being depends on robust fossil-fuel use, so Gore's plan would destroy these as well.

But, don't worry! The all-in estimated cost to re-engineer humanity is only a mere $15 trillion—enough money to give every man, woman, and child in the United States more than $46,000.


You should have never posted this. Now the Omnipotent One (Impotent One?) will think this will really work as he prays at the alter of Al Gore.  :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I 100% support this carbon tax.  Tax all the polluters till they change.  Make it cheaper to go green.  Inspector knows how people work,  cause half this site prays to the "trump god".

punaperson

Re: Ah the paid climate change/polution denying members are at it again
« Reply #119 on: May 27, 2017, 01:26:49 PM »
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/05/the_carbontax_rebate_scam.html

The Carbon Tax Rebate Scam
By H. Sterling Burnett

A group of old-guard, “swamp” Republicans calling themselves the Climate Leadership Council (CLC) has joined climate alarmists, including failed Democratic Party presidential candidate Al Gore, in calling for a tax on carbon-dioxide emissions. The group claims increasing CO2 emissions pose a threat for Earth’s people, animals, and plants.

Economic analyses of various carbon-tax proposals consistently show they would harm all Americans and would be detrimental for the U.S. economy. A carbon tax would burden businesses with unnecessary costs, making them less competitive in the global marketplace. All this, and much more, is why Congress passed a resolution in 2016 rejecting carbon taxes.

* * * * *
There is no good time to enact bad policy, and carbon taxes are undoubtedly that. Republicans shouldn’t let the nebulous specter of climate change transform it into the party of protectionism, larger government, higher taxes, and less freedom. Democrats already have that covered!