wait 80%?
i thought it was a "proven fact"?
or as your TV friend says "settled science"?

See what happens when you have no facts?  You use words like "probably" and "around". 

That's why Climate Change is a THEORY, and NOT a fact-based, provable LAW.  Laws, like gravity -- which you like to bring up -- are indisputable, proven and predictable.  Climate change is not any of these.  The margin of error so far on all these climate related disasters is 100%.  Why is the latest one any better?

Sorry, dude.  Your religion might be based on some percentage of actual truth, but so are other religions.  I've studied it.  Stories in the Bible actually did happen.  There are plenty of other, independent writings which corroborate the basic facts of Jesus actually living and visiting the places in the Bible. The census that took Mary & Joseph to Bethlehem was documented.  The parting of the Red Sea was also recorded -- not as a religious story of God parting the waters, but of the Reed Sea, where it was mostly muddy swampland.  The chariots of Egypt would have gotten bogged down there, and the winds blowing would have dried the land enough for the freed slaves to "assist" God in smiting the soldiers, now that the slaves were greater in number and without chariots to fight against.  All recorded as history.

So, you keep believing, but don't act like your beliefs are better than any others' until you can prove them.

That position seems extreme, I question whether or not you stated or recognize your own position correctly. You believe it is proven that humans cannot affect the climate enough to make a difference?

"interpenetrate'

That position seems extreme, I question whether or not you stated or recognize your own position correctly. You believe it is proven that humans cannot affect the climate enough to make a difference?

Haha! However I would suggest not to underestimate the juju-man, his explanation is not really that much worse, mostly just different terminology and a shallower understanding. Remember, "modern" medicine used to perform lobotomies and suck blood out with leeches not long ago. "Current" medicine in my opinion is just as bad with our acceptance of the ridiculous idea of "mental illness". Or the way we "treat" Alzheimer's thinking its due to chemical imbalances in brain fluids (I suspect it's a much more fundamental problem such as the loss/death of brain cells with age, or perhaps a limitation with animal intelligence itself i.e. running out of hard drive space).

Another disturbing analogy -- the current "judicial" system versus the middle ages "church" system. If you replace the terminology, priests with judges, banishment/stoning with imprisonment/injection, religious law with fuzzy corrupt politician law....is it really so different?

Its settled we know we are at fault, we know the climate is changing but we don't know exactly how.  That doesn't mean its a false fact...

But, it could mean you are a borderline hysteric.

Just how old are you?

Its settled we know we are at fault, we know the climate is changing but we don't know exactly how.  That doesn't mean its a false fact....We don't exactly know the entire reason/how the big bang happened but we are 95% sure it did.  Does this mean with your definitions its false?

Yeah no all religions are basically fake.  Sure some of the coincidence stores might be sorta rooted in truth but that ain't no sign of a god.  Its simple coincidence.  Random events that people interpret it as something greater.  Then they embellish said stories as some sort of proof of their god.  Jesus was probably a real person so what?  Anyone can start a cult/religion and make themselves one of the main people in it.  Look at cult leaders saying they are the reborn jesus.  Sure Mary cheated on Joseph had a kid, said the kid was "gods" son and poor Joseph believed it.  Hell this story happens all the time nowdays.  But you don't people saying god made this baby anymore cause its crazy.  The red sea, wow it got muddy/dried up....must be proof of god.  When there are random storms that kill enemy troops.  Must be god, no other reason could be plausible right?

Borderline?  Have you not been following the Climate Change threads?   

But, it could mean you are a borderline hysteric.

Just how old are you?

Why are you so against the teachings of religions?  I'm not arguing for the belief aspect. I'm making a parallel argument that goes along with your assertion.  You said a certain percentage of Climate Change is based on facts.  I'm saying Christianity is also base in some part on facts.  Both require some degree of faith to fill in the unknown parts, true? 

You don't have to believe in the things the Bible teaches, but you DO have to acknowledge it's not based 100% on fiction and imagination.  It has basis in fact.  To think science has some sort of corner on the market when it comes to facts is ridiculous.

I'm against you saying religion is logical when its not, then 5 seconds later calling me out on climate change which has alot more proof behind it.  I told you what its based on.  Some realish events that a dude made a cult for people to follow on. Doesn't even prove that god exists a little bit.

It's all a matter of degree, and which of these you put your faith in.

I don't put my faith in a government pushing a "sky is falling" Climate Change "theory" while having a not-so-great track record, failed predictions, and a "do as I say, not a I do" attitude toward a "crisis."

For that, you call me a "denier" and too stupid to believe in "science."

Christianity as an institution has benefits that include moral teachings, faith in a higher power beyond themselves (called humility), and provides comfort in times of grief and stress.  Those are all positive things.

For that, you call those who believe in God ignorant.

You're not really good at this salesmanship thing, are you?

Nye is as big a fake and hack as algore.  He apparently never had a job as an engineer. 

Anyone that has gone to an engineering school knows the mech engineering majors (ME) are generally the dumbest.

Figures he would try a scam like this, algore likely is advising him how to play it.

while not 100% proven I would dare to say its around 80% there.

signalling out

I elaborating a bit in my edit.  The teaching of morality is the main reason why religion exists to this day.   It does indeed serve a purpose in that sense I'm not denying that.  But we don't need it anymore in the age of science we can be taught to be better humans for the sake of humanity. Hopefully we have evolved to that point. Also fyi I am by no means signalling out Christianity.  Honestly its one of the better religions out there.
There is a reason why religion and science cant really be argued at once.  They are polar opposites.  One is rooted in blind belief.  One is rooted in fact.  Climate change has a real root in real science, while not 100% proven I would dare to say its around 80% there.  Much like many things in this universe that we don't fully understand it 100%.  But to deny something with a lot of evidence because it isn't perfect is foolish. You would be denying how the universe works.

Honestly I hope he does exist, I try to live life as if he does (morally).

wow
just wow