Sounds like you're like me as being close to the middle for N and S.  Interesting that you're pretty strong J.

Seems like many times you argued based on intuition.

I had the percentages wrong it was 8% i believe.  If you got a decent site not random google stuff let me know.  Curious lol

I had the percentages wrong it was 8% i believe.  If you got a decent site not random google stuff let me know.  Curious lol

I can't find the version that I took in the training/class that I took recently (maybe 2-3 years ago), but this one was one that was forwarded to me by a "professional".

Not sure if that's a "good" one though. 

http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp

mfw i did the test and got ISTJ

http://www.acronymfinder.com/MFW.html
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=mfw

https://www.16personalities.com/istj-personality
hmmm, jason bourne

http://www.acronymfinder.com/MFW.html
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=mfw

https://www.16personalities.com/istj-personality
hmmm, jason bourne

lol thats right i'm probably one of the younger people here.

I can't find the version that I took in the training/class that I took recently (maybe 2-3 years ago), but this one was one that was forwarded to me by a "professional".

Not sure if that's a "good" one though. 

http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp

INTJ
Introvert(22%)  iNtuitive(6%)  Thinking(34%)  Judging(47%)
If I remember in my past I mostly got INTJ,  though some of my recent tests today started to get ISTJ

From reading the descriptions on that site I guess INTJ does describe me the best

Can't believe we are in the same trade.  But yeah I do agree for computers I also tend to use experience and if that fails go through a specific process approach. AKA manuals/google

Why can't you believe it?  Because computers didn't exist before you were born? 

I have evidence, and it proves above 80%, even 97%, that what I said is FACT! 

Seems like your "beliefs" need some adjustments.      

Why can't you believe it?  Because computers didn't exist before you were born? 

I have evidence, and it proves above 80%, even 97%, that what I said is FACT! 

Seems like your "beliefs" need some adjustments.      

Idk, just didn't picture you working with computers.  I'm not THAT young either lol. 
Take this test http://www.humanmetrics.com/

Idk, just didn't picture you working with computers.  I'm not THAT young either lol. 
Take this test http://www.humanmetrics.com/

No thanks.  I went through a similar evaluation in my last job and I don't even know how many times on active duty.

I'm analytical, get along with people who are more logical and less emotional, and am firm in my opinions until someone shows a logical argument to prove me wrong.

Pretty close, but as Hannibal Lector said, "Do you think you can dissect ME with this blunt, little tool?"

INTJ
Introvert(22%)  iNtuitive(6%)  Thinking(34%)  Judging(47%)
If I remember in my past I mostly got INTJ,  though some of my recent tests today started to get ISTJ

From reading the descriptions on that site I guess INTJ does describe me the best

lol, we exactly the same, omni

“THE LOGISTICIAN” (ISTJ-A)
 SENTINEL
 CONFIDENT INDIVIDUALISM
41%59%
INTROVERTED
22%78%
OBSERVANT
85%15%
THINKING
54%46%
JUDGING
69%31%
ASSERTIVE

mfw i did the test and got ISTJ

Keirsey ISTJ
http://www.keirsey.com/4temps/inspector.asp

ISTJs and NTs don't communicate well. I would surmise that FJ is an NT type.

NT overview
http://www.keirsey.com/4temps/rational_overview.asp

If you're looking for a test, the David Keirsey one is pretty good.

http://www.keirsey.com/sorter/register.aspx

Keirsey ISTJ
http://www.keirsey.com/4temps/inspector.asp

ISTJs and NTs don't communicate well. I would surmise that FJ is an NT type.

NT overview
http://www.keirsey.com/4temps/rational_overview.asp

Hey now, don't bring me into this!!! 

If you're looking for a test, the David Keirsey one is pretty good.

http://www.keirsey.com/sorter/register.aspx

Guardian ESTJ


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Keirsey ISTJ
http://www.keirsey.com/4temps/inspector.asp

ISTJs and NTs don't communicate well. I would surmise that FJ is an NT type.

NT overview
http://www.keirsey.com/4temps/rational_overview.asp

I think that first test I did was wrong.  Its coming up INJT now.

NTs and NFs communicate in abstract terms.  They understand each other well and are good complements to each other.

SPs and SJs communicate in concrete terms. They understand each other well and are good complements to each other.

The former (NT and SP) are efficiency/task oriented while the latter (NF and SJ) are relationship/people oriented.

For abstract people:
NTs and SJs are polar opposites, as are NFs and SPs. They communicate differently and won't understand each other.

For concrete people:
So if NTs (Flapp, Inspector, Omni) and SJs (EEF?) try to discuss something, they will not understand each other and will just get frustrated.

Of course individuals vary in these traits to a degree, so the degree of compatibility or incompatibility is not necessarily binary.

It's a tangent but if anyone is interested, David Keirsey's "Please Understand Me 2" book is really really good.

I denounce the study of human behavior as a "science" therefore I am type ZZZZ.

I think that first test I did was wrong.  Its coming up INJT now.

 

you just don't want to be the same as me...

i am
jason bourne

NTs and NFs communicate in abstract terms.  They understand each other well and are good complements to each other.

SPs and SJs communicate in concrete terms. They understand each other well and are good complements to each other.

The former (NT and SP) are efficiency/task oriented while the latter (NF and SJ) are relationship/people oriented.

For abstract people:
NTs and SJs are polar opposites, as are NFs and SPs. They communicate differently and won't understand each other.

For concrete people:
So if NTs (Flapp, Inspector, Omni) and SJs (EEF?) try to discuss something, they will not understand each other and will just get frustrated.

Of course individuals vary in these traits to a degree, so the degree of compatibility or incompatibility is not necessarily binary.

It's a tangent but if anyone is interested, David Keirsey's "Please Understand Me 2" book is really really good.

Hey now, don't bring me into this!!! 

I think that first test I did was wrong.  Its coming up INJT now.

Don't think there's a "wrong" way to do the test.  There are many questions where I would respond somewhere in between, but just have to choose the one that fits best.  There were many that were close to 50/50 for me, so if I am borderline on some aspects, I can see it changing and for me it has changed over the years as well as responding from a work perspective as opposed to personal perspective.  For some that is the same thing, but for me, it has been different.