She's got 32 years experience at HPD. That counts quite a bit.
The commission also said they were swayed by her answers during the interview on restoring public confidence in the department and continuing to work on the problems there.
I'm not arguing she's the best choice. Just don't think it's fair to trash her before she's had a chance.
Fair enough, but I'm somewhat jaded by the entire process and corrupt officials. Was kealoha himself not heralded as some beacon of light when he was first appointed HPD chief?
What your describing is the police commissioners who are the outsiders looking in. You want an experienced police chief cause they need to know what is right and wrong in the job. The commission and state prosecutor were the big problems in the kealoha case who brushed things off. If they fail at their jobs then the feds takeover so the system did work.
Perhaps the commissioners need more authority to investigate and have their role defined better. Kinda hard though since they're volunteers.
Sorry, I guess I wasn't super clear. It could be someone from a different PO, say Texas or wherever or it could be a retired PO, who's been out of the game for a number of years. These types of people should be an outsider, at least to the current band of shibai and corruption during kealoha's era, but still have the experience for the chief's job.
The commission, prosecutors, mayor, everyone share some blame, but the biggest fault lay with the chief and the officers under him, who need to show the public they have - integrity, honesty, respect.