Trump (Read 568648 times)

Bota-CS1

Re: Trump
« Reply #300 on: February 07, 2018, 12:48:28 PM »
I got a new name for him - Parade Man.  Seriously?  You want a parade like the one he saw on Bastille day to honor the troops?  Fuck that noise!  You want to honor the troops?  Fix the VA so our troops aren’t dying waiting to see a specialist!  Honor our troops by fixing the VA so civilians don’t go “oh you poor thing!” when they hear their vet friend say they have an appointment there.   :shaka:
No one is coming, it’s up to us.

Legislation should never be about depriving law abiding citizens of something, but rather taking those things away from criminals.

G35soldier

Re: Trump
« Reply #301 on: February 07, 2018, 07:25:29 PM »
I get the feeling it's all a slide of hands to distract people from the serious issues. I wasn't a fan of either candidate but between a liar with experience and a businessman who's bankrupted many businesses to save his own ass the lesser of evils to me was the liar.  All politicians lie about what agenda is important to them until they get in office even if they do it inadvertently. It's easy to say Trump did multiple times that Obama was screwing up then he turns around and says it's a lot different when you're in the seat making those decisions yourself. You can't run the country like you run a business so hiring half of his family and friends that have no experience whatsoever is a stupid move one that has everybody gone the International Community laughing at us. When it gets to the point where you're trying to discredit your own FBI and people that you placed in these positions yourself simply because you can't own up to the Shady crap you've done is disheartening. He can't fix Healthcare for the thousands upon thousands veterans so how is he going to do it for the country the ACA all the shortcomings that it did have was better than nothing to me.

rklapp

Re: Trump
« Reply #302 on: February 08, 2018, 11:13:03 AM »
Does President Trump know that Bastille Day is about poor people chopping off the heads of rich people?
Yahh! Freedom and justice shall always prevail over tyranny, Babysitter Girl!
https://ronsreloading.wordpress.com/

punaperson

Re: Trump
« Reply #303 on: February 08, 2018, 11:20:07 AM »
Does President Trump know that Bastille Day is about poor people chopping off the heads of rich people?
Let them eat cake.

eyeeatingfish

Re: Trump
« Reply #304 on: February 12, 2018, 01:11:00 PM »
I got a new name for him - Parade Man.  Seriously?  You want a parade like the one he saw on Bastille day to honor the troops?  Fuck that noise!  You want to honor the troops?  Fix the VA so our troops aren’t dying waiting to see a specialist!  Honor our troops by fixing the VA so civilians don’t go “oh you poor thing!” when they hear their vet friend say they have an appointment there.   :shaka:

Amen!
What a waste of money and time.

eyeeatingfish

Re: Trump
« Reply #305 on: February 16, 2018, 09:57:59 AM »
He was quoting someone else for the treasonous part. I took it as sarcasm, personally. I think he meant it that way. JMHO

Agreed but it still looks bad and is something you don't joke about. It is just unprofessional and come on, if Obama made the same joke, you don't think Republicans would have a field day with it?

ren

Re: Trump
« Reply #306 on: February 16, 2018, 10:05:58 AM »
In my opinion he was a civie most of his life and didn't spend his life as a politician. He did attend the MYMA and I can only imagine as a cadet, there's lots of pomp and circumstance.  So while many in the rank and file of DC politics see it as a waste of time and money, perhaps jaded in careers in politics, President Trump may just be seeing it as a way to show appreciation for the military .
Deeds Not Words

Heavies

Re: Trump
« Reply #307 on: February 16, 2018, 04:52:21 PM »
I watched a press conference, an entire one, not snippets spoon fed by the media, and that parade question was brought up many times.    It was said time and time again the president wanted suggestions on how to honor the military, and may have brought up the idea of a parade, the idea of a parade was looked into, and not a commandment by the president to make it so. 

The media has blown this way out of proportion and made it some kind of issue.  Further enforcing the "Fake News" label, IMHO...

ren

Re: Trump
« Reply #308 on: February 16, 2018, 05:26:54 PM »
I watched a press conference, an entire one, not snippets spoon fed by the media, and that parade question was brought up many times.    It was said time and time again the president wanted suggestions on how to honor the military, and may have brought up the idea of a parade, the idea of a parade was looked into, and not a commandment by the president to make it so. 

The media has blown this way out of proportion and made it some kind of issue.  Further enforcing the "Fake News" label, IMHO...

did not know that
Deeds Not Words

Inspector

Re: Trump
« Reply #309 on: February 17, 2018, 06:13:55 AM »
Based on the statement from the special council along with the indictments of the Russian nationals and companies, it appears that Trump and his campaign have been cleared of any wrong doing. Dems heads to explode in 3 - 2 - 1  :o :o :o
.
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Trump
« Reply #310 on: February 17, 2018, 11:44:52 AM »
Based on the statement from the special council along with the indictments of the Russian nationals and companies, it appears that Trump and his campaign have been cleared of any wrong doing. Dems heads to explode in 3 - 2 - 1  :o :o :o
.

Libs on TV continue to deny the indictments imply anything about Trump and his people.  They are holding out hope that this was just the "first round" of indictments. 

I think if they had any Trump-related charges, they would have been announced by now, or at least leaked to the press through that information sieve called the FBI and DOJ. 

Thirteen Russian trolls bad-mouthing the candidates, a statement that no Americans knowingly colluded with them, and no other indictments.

Sounds like 8 years, millions of dollars, and a bunch of "resistance" energy poorly spent.  We already knew of the Russians hacking the DNC and using social media BEFORE Mueller.  Such a waste, and a huge distraction meant to delegitimize Donald Trump's presidency.  The media and all who followed the Russian-created "Not My President" BS should be embarrassed.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Heavies

Re: Trump
« Reply #311 on: February 18, 2018, 07:11:27 PM »

Bunker

Re: Trump
« Reply #312 on: February 18, 2018, 07:48:57 PM »
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-surveyed-mar-a-lago-members-over-gun-control-in-wake-of-school-shooting-report/ar-BBJiVU3?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=ientp


Will NY democrat re-awaken in regards to the latest???   ???
Not if he ever wants to be reelected...political suicide to do anything real harsh...like AWB. He would totally lose his base.

I suspect he will look into more stringent background checks and maybe something related to mental health.

He should look into why the FBI dropped the ball on this one and other prior incidents. He could harden schools with either voluntarily trained teachers or armed security. I would think each school would present a different set of circumstances and a good assessment of schools would be worth looking into. JMHO

astroboy

Re: Trump
« Reply #313 on: February 19, 2018, 04:33:26 PM »
Libs on TV continue to deny the indictments imply anything about Trump and his people.  They are holding out hope that this was just the "first round" of indictments. 

I think if they had any Trump-related charges, they would have been announced by now, or at least leaked to the press through that information sieve called the FBI and DOJ. 

Thirteen Russian trolls bad-mouthing the candidates, a statement that no Americans knowingly colluded with them, and no other indictments.

Sounds like 8 years, millions of dollars, and a bunch of "resistance" energy poorly spent.  We already knew of the Russians hacking the DNC and using social media BEFORE Mueller.  Such a waste, and a huge distraction meant to delegitimize Donald Trump's presidency.  The media and all who followed the Russian-created "Not My President" BS should be embarrassed.
Well said Flapp
According to facebook exec. Russia spent the bulk of their ad money AFTER the Nov. election. Their main goal was to spread dissent and anarchy within the US and other western nations. Thanks to MSM, liberal politicians, celebrities, and others they have had success. I strongly advise everyone, liberals, and conservatives to read the book titled: Disinformation by former Romanian spy chief Lt. Gen. Pacepa. For decades the Russians have managed to damage the West by spreading all sorts of disinformation aided and abetted by useful idiots in the US and other nations. The "dezinformatsiya program" employed moles and well intentioned fools to create much hatred and fear within nations. The book is so relevant in times like these.         

eyeeatingfish

Re: Trump
« Reply #314 on: February 19, 2018, 09:14:13 PM »
Trump's presidency has been a very mixed bag in my opinion. He has done and said some good things and done and said some stupid things. He has accomplished many tasks he had promised to start on on day 1 and other things he has gone over a year with no action.

I understand Trump supporters who want him to succeed but I don't know why he gets such a pass when he fails.

macsak

Re: Trump
« Reply #315 on: February 19, 2018, 09:21:34 PM »
Trump's presidency has been a very mixed bag in my opinion. He has done and said some good things and done and said some stupid things. He has accomplished many tasks he had promised to start on on day 1 and other things he has gone over a year with no action.

I understand Trump supporters who want him to succeed but I don't know why he gets such a pass when he fails.

same thing could be said about o'bama year 1 (and year 2 and year 3 and year 4 and year 5 and year 6 and year 7 and year 8)

eyeeatingfish

Re: Trump
« Reply #316 on: February 19, 2018, 09:25:41 PM »
same thing could be said about o'bama year 1 (and year 2 and year 3 and year 4 and year 5 and year 6 and year 7 and year 8)

Indeed, Obama had his blind followers too.

rklapp

Re: Trump
« Reply #317 on: February 20, 2018, 09:40:28 PM »
Technically, the President can give top secret clearance to anyone he wants. How does that work? Does the President have to hand Kushner every top secret document? Does he have to write a note every day saying "I Donald J. Trump give bigly top secret clearance to my son in law, Jared Kushner for the next 24 hours"?
Yahh! Freedom and justice shall always prevail over tyranny, Babysitter Girl!
https://ronsreloading.wordpress.com/

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Trump
« Reply #318 on: February 20, 2018, 09:56:39 PM »
Technically, the President can give top secret clearance to anyone he wants. How does that work? Does the President have to hand Kushner every top secret document? Does he have to write a note every day saying "I Donald J. Trump give bigly top secret clearance to my son in law, Jared Kushner for the next 24 hours"?

Have you ever held a security clearance?  Trump isn't the only one who can do that.
 
Unit commanders have the power to grant an interim clearance when the mission requires it, and if a preliminary review of the clearance application appears to have no show-stoppers.  The clearance investigation is processed simultaneously while the individual is allowed to work. 

This happens quite often for people who held clearances in the past and might need a new investigation to reinstate their clearance.  Sometimes the investigation takes an exorbitantly long time, and there's not enough people able to perform those duties.  Commander's discretion.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

s197

Re: Trump
« Reply #319 on: February 20, 2018, 10:42:55 PM »
I understand Trump supporters who want him to succeed but I don't know why he gets such a pass when he fails.

Cognitive dissonance.