Answer me this, so Hillary was investigated and never charged with a crime but she is guilty and should go to prison meanwhile Trump was investigated and never charged with anything and that means he is actually innocent. Do you see where that looks like you are picking and choosing what you would like to believe?

Hillary committed multiple felonies(as the now public evidence suggests) she was also exonerated prior to being investigated. She was even able to hire private third party groups to "investigate" her and have that "evidence" used to clear her without any government oversight or fact checking. Her pals in the DOJ/FBI/CIA all knowingly covered for her and manipulated the outcome of the investigations.  You likening the two only shows you choosing what you would like to believe. Not having evidence to exonerate or indict is not the same as being caught committing a crime(multiple in Hill's case) and having your political donors/allies decide to not charge you.

Hillary lied her a$$ off, but everything's okay because she was never put under oath,her staff was given immunity prior to testifying.  Meuller even helped some of her investigators by scrubbing their phones so there would be no legal evidence of their bias(favorable for Clinton and negative for Trump). This evidence is all out in the open, you are not changing any minds here because many of us have dug into both separate cases from multiple angles both pro and anti Trump.

It's not too late you can still save face, you don't have to like the president but arguing semantics does nothing but prove that you are indeed not seeing this from a nuetral  standpoint.

Hillary committed multiple felonies(as the now public evidence suggests) she was also exonerated prior to being investigated. She was even able to hire private third party groups to "investigate" her and have that "evidence" used to clear her without any government oversight or fact checking. Her pals in the DOJ/FBI/CIA all knowingly covered for her and manipulated the outcome of the investigations.  You likening the two only shows you choosing what you would like to believe. Not having evidence to exonerate or indict is not the same as being caught committing a crime(multiple in Hill's case) and having your political donors/allies decide to not charge you.

Hillary lied her a$$ off, but everything's okay because she was never put under oath,her staff was given immunity prior to testifying.  Meuller even helped some of her investigators by scrubbing their phones so there would be no legal evidence of their bias(favorable for Clinton and negative for Trump). This evidence is all out in the open, you are not changing any minds here because many of us have dug into both separate cases from multiple angles both pro and anti Trump.

It's not too late you can still save face, you don't have to like the president but arguing semantics does nothing but prove that you are indeed not seeing this from a nuetral  standpoint.

Readers' Digest Condensed Version:

Hillary wasn't charged due to a corrupt DOJ, FBI and WH administration.

The correct decision would have been to send the case to a grand jury. After Lynch "recused" herself, and we now know she ordered Comey to not indict Hillary. Calling a grand jury was the only way to get an impartial decision on whether she should have faced a trial.

Comey overstepped by making the indictment call.

Hillary was given special treatment. Corrupt outcome, pure and simple. To pretend the decision to not indict indicates she was given the same "due process" others received is beyond laughable.

waste time arguing with a tree. He only does this to get a reaction from you. Notice that he posts a whole bunch of stuff particularly in the political thread. If his logic is anything like his Burris combat optic thread there is none. The guy says he wants an ACOG and ends up with an MRO.  He asks for something free then paces back & forth about accepting it. Indecisive dribble

Russia, saudi, and syria donated millions to hillary. Idk who mexico donated to.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I read the US Attorney General Barr's summary of the Mueller report.

In case you missed it, here's the take-away:


Trump won the 2016 election fair and square.
The end.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/03/clapper-sings-former-director-of-national-intelligence-james-clapper-tells-cnn-obama-ordered-the-trump-russia-spying-operation-video/
Clapper might want to have people start checking his food and beverages. Maybe wear some of those glasses with mirrors facing the rear.
 

2 more nominations for the corrupt 9th

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

If someone throws something at the president, does the secret service yell "Donald Duck".

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

If someone throws something at the president, does the secret service yell "Donald Duck".

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

"Donald Duck!" wouldn't work very well if they are visiting Florida. Trump would stand there: "Where? I love that bird!"



It would likely be more in the neighborhood of: "Mogul, move!"

Trump's Secret Service code name is "Mogul."

Code names are created for the first family by the WH Communications Director and given to the SS.

Donald Trump – Mogul
Melania Trump – Muse
Donald Trump Jr. – Mountaineer
Ivanka Trump – Marvel
Eric Trump – Marksman

And now you know .... the REST .... of the story.   

As I said in Barack Hussein Obama's thread - his Nobel Peace prize should go to Trump for his NK talks.

As I said in Barack Hussein Obama's thread - his Nobel Peace prize should go to Trump for his NK talks.

We all know he should at least be nominated for one just for them talking.  No need even any actions.  But it's political so there is no way in hell he would be nominated.  But he did answer like a boss when someone asked him about not being nominated.  He said "peace is the prize".

If someone throws something at the president, does the secret service yell "Donald Duck".

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

You should try it and find out...

China promises to classify fenyl as a narcotic.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Hillary committed multiple felonies(as the now public evidence suggests) she was also exonerated prior to being investigated. She was even able to hire private third party groups to "investigate" her and have that "evidence" used to clear her without any government oversight or fact checking. Her pals in the DOJ/FBI/CIA all knowingly covered for her and manipulated the outcome of the investigations.  You likening the two only shows you choosing what you would like to believe. Not having evidence to exonerate or indict is not the same as being caught committing a crime(multiple in Hill's case) and having your political donors/allies decide to not charge you.

Hillary lied her a$$ off, but everything's okay because she was never put under oath,her staff was given immunity prior to testifying.  Meuller even helped some of her investigators by scrubbing their phones so there would be no legal evidence of their bias(favorable for Clinton and negative for Trump). This evidence is all out in the open, you are not changing any minds here because many of us have dug into both separate cases from multiple angles both pro and anti Trump.

It's not too late you can still save face, you don't have to like the president but arguing semantics does nothing but prove that you are indeed not seeing this from a nuetral  standpoint.

I think you missed my point with Hillary. I was illustrating a situation where she wasn't charged with anything but that clearly doesn't mean she is innocent or exonerated.

I wouldn't consider this semantics but an important legal distinction. I get it that a lot of people don't understand so I am just trying to illustrate it. The same way someone might not know the difference between a clip and a magazine, but it doesn't make it semantics.

And to clarify something, yes I don't like Trump but I would be against any dirty tricks to get him out of office. If he is to be removed then it must be done via the proper mechanism. Even though I don't like him I would never accept removal of him on the basis of a lie. Note that I have never said anything to the effect that the Mueller report suggest, proves, implies or otherwise shows guilt on Trump's part.

The only responsible position is to admit that until the Mueller report is fully made public Mueller's team did not feel there was sufficient evidence to prove.

waste time arguing with a tree. He only does this to get a reaction from you. Notice that he posts a whole bunch of stuff particularly in the political thread. If his logic is anything like his Burris combat optic thread there is none. The guy says he wants an ACOG and ends up with an MRO.  He asks for something free then paces back & forth about accepting it. Indecisive dribble

Right because anyone who doesn't agree must automatically be a troll, what a crock of poop.

You got a problem with someone deciding on an MRO over an ACOG (HALF THE PRICE!)

You are behaving like the troll, I am just voicing my opinion on subjects which happen to be different than yours. I didn't know you had such a hard time with that, I will try not to offend your delicate sensibilities in the future.

Right because anyone who doesn't agree must automatically be a troll, what a crock of poop.

You got a problem with someone deciding on an MRO over an ACOG (HALF THE PRICE!)

You are behaving like the troll, I am just voicing my opinion on subjects which happen to be different than yours. I didn't know you had such a hard time with that, I will try not to offend your delicate sensibilities in the future.

Nothing you posted in this comment is related to the topic.

Enough with the hijacking. Not every thread is for your little tantrums and arguments. If you have an opinion on the topic (IF?    ), comment. Otherwise, we don't need to see you defending yourself AGAIN for the millionth time.

Just stop.   

Right because anyone who doesn't agree must automatically be a troll, what a crock of poop.

You got a problem with someone deciding on an MRO over an ACOG (HALF THE PRICE!)

You are behaving like the troll, I am just voicing my opinion on subjects which happen to be different than yours. I didn't know you had such a hard time with that, I will try not to offend your delicate sensibilities in the future.

Hillary was HALF THE PRICE but we all wanted the full deal - Trump !
MAGA!

So fake news now running the story about avocado shortage if Trump shuts down the border.  I guess the Russia thing is so yesterdays news.

So fake news now running the story about avocado shortage if Trump shuts down the border.  I guess the Russia thing is so yesterdays news.

Sounds like a 1st world problem. Can't have avocado dip for your party guests or guacamole on your gluten-free, no dairy taco salad. OMG!! The horror!!

Avocado is a tree seed. The energy you get from it is 75% from fat. Very little nutrition - or flavor for that matter.

Mexico has been improving in their efforts to stop these caravans at their own Southern border, but not enough. They also don't do anything to stop their own citizens from crossing illegally into the US.

Make it sting. They'll figure it out.

Hmmm....
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/04/02/comey-to-trump-supporters-your-president-tried-to-burn-down-the-doj-fbi/

When asked about the president referring to the Mueller probe as a witch-hunt, Comey said, “First, take a look in the mirror and ask what happened to Bob Mueller and the mean being corrupt and evil and a nest of deep state traitors that they reached a conclusion that the president is happy with. Just don’t move in front of that. Your president tried to burn down the Department of Justice and the FBI and that matters. Take a look in the mirror and ask what you have learned from that experience. Second, you have fired all of us if we didn’t investigate what we learned in the summer of 2016 when we got smoke, not fire, but smoke that Americans might have assisted the Russian effort. We had to investigate, that and no serious person could think otherwise, and it was done in a serious way, and it reached a serious result, and now we all ought to get transparency on.”

Notice Comey said "your president" 
I clearly remember R. Rosentein gave our POTUS the recommendation to fire the then FBI director. After following the recommendations of Rosenstein the president somehow obstructed justice, his actions were then used (by the same people who recommended he take action) as a means to try to prosecute a crime.
Seems to me that Trump is not responsible for burning down the FBI or DoJ, they did that all in their own.