Read from a "source" IG investigations are begining for spygate. Obama, hillary, MI6, etc... crossing fingers.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Warren released her tax returns.  More should follow.  But anyone with a brain knows the real money flows via their "foundations".

Trump announces that since they can only detain an illegal crossing the border for 20 days, he wants to deliver them to all the sanctuary cities by the thousands and see if they still are going to welcome them with open arms as they stated they would.

I would love to see this happen.

Totally 1 of the reasons why I voted for him.  Not afraid to call out people on their BS.

Trump announces that since they can only detain an illegal crossing the border for 20 days, he wants to deliver them to all the sanctuary cities by the thousands and see if they still are going to welcome them with open arms as they stated they would.

I would love to see this happen.

Totally 1 of the reasons why I voted for him.  Not afraid to call out people on their BS.

Dems are already raising hell. "You can't do that! It's illegal! You shouldn't be using people as political pawns!"

I'm pretty sure it's legal. The only issue is how much it'll cost to transport them.

And Democrats would never win another election if they stopped using people for political points.

Dems calling illegal immigrants political pRawns???
Dems want them as an easy-bake voting base. 

How come news about El Chapo went dark? I wonder who he was paying...

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Trump announces that since they can only detain an illegal crossing the border for 20 days, he wants to deliver them to all the sanctuary cities by the thousands and see if they still are going to welcome them with open arms as they stated they would.

I would love to see this happen.

Totally 1 of the reasons why I voted for him.  Not afraid to call out people on their BS.

Saw that on the news.  Couldn’t stop laughing when he said that and even more when I saw the reaction of the CA governor.

we are sanctuary city

we are sanctuary city

Actually, we are .... but we aren't.

We're doing everything a sanctuary city does, but without formally calling ourselves one. Maybe its a ploy to avoid Trump cutting funding for the rail?

http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/35457736/honolulus-stance-on-illegal-immigrants-and-becoming-a-sanctuary-city/

Predictable ...... 

I really laughed at all the Dems saying Trump is "inciting violence" by Tweeting "WE WILL NEVER FORGET" this week.

Here's what the Left/Democrats see as "protected speech". This would never incite violence against Trump or Republican voters, right?

I have to give credit to Trump for his idea of sending them all to the sanctuary cities.

It is a stupid idea but it is a pretty epic trolling of the left.

I have no interest in your opinions.

Stop replying to me.

Maybe 2aHawaii needs a safe space so people don't have to hear conflicting opinions...

I have to give credit to Trump for his idea of sending them all to the sanctuary cities.

It is a stupid idea but it is a pretty epic trolling of the left.

What’s stupid? Trump’s statement or sanctuary cities?

Cher is starting to sound like a MAGA supporter. Hahaha Troll level 9999.

The vid on youtube has been deleted, but there was a guy in the UK interviewing people and if they would take an "asylum seeker" into their home.  All those who said yes, he then called over his friend and said "well he's an asylum seeker, can you take him home with you now?".  And the responses were epic.  "Ummm, well  you know, right now I don't have room".

Easy to talk shit if you're not the one affected.

So why would Russia back Trump?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nato-head-says-trumps-tough-talk-has-helped-alliancel

So why would Russia back Trump?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nato-head-says-trumps-tough-talk-has-helped-alliancel

Bad link... coincidence?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

From the Washington Post OpEd section .....   

Admit it: Fox News has been right all along

By Gary Abernathy
Contributing columnist
April 15


Throughout most of southern Ohio, residents who watch cable news are predominantly glued to one channel: Fox News.

People there don’t watch Fox News to know what to think; they already know what they think, and they avoid news
channels that insult their intelligence and core beliefs. Yes, Fox News is an echo chamber for the right, but no more
than CNN and MSNBC are for the left, as far as conservatives are concerned. To be fair, when a Democrat is in the
White House, the networks switch places, with Fox News criticizing every move, and MSNBC and CNN defending the
Oval Office fortress.

But for now, while partisans on the left may quibble, the fact remains that on the subject of collusion with Russia by
President Trump or his campaign, Fox News was right and the others were wrong. For at least two years, MSNBC
and CNN devoted hour upon hour, day after day, to promoting the narrative that Trump colluded with the Russians,
and that special counsel Robert S. Mueller III was going to prove it. That turned out to be wrong.

Along with defending Trump, Fox News hosts such as Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham and, especially, Sean Hannity
have been slammed for spending nearly two years clamoring for an investigation of the investigators, aligning themselves
with the president’s claim of a politically motivated witch hunt. Most of the media portrayed such accusations as preposterous,
designed merely to divert attention from Trump’s alleged misdeeds.

But then comes Attorney General William P. Barr, dropping a bombshell last week by declaring during congressional testimony
that he thinks “spying did occur” on the Trump campaign in 2016, and that he is looking into it. Democrats and many in the
media immediately blasted Barr for carrying Trump’s water. Barr soon clarified his remarks, saying, “I am not saying that improper
surveillance occurred. I’m saying that I am concerned about it and looking into it.”

Just three weeks ago, before Mueller wrapped up his report, The Post — in a story representative of mainstream sources at the
time — produced a mostly flattering profile of the new attorney general. “A Justice Department official told The Washington Post
last month that Barr is viewed at the department as ‘a lawyer’s lawyer’ and is seen as less politically minded than his predecessors,”
the story noted.

Timothy Flanigan, a former Barr colleague at the Justice Department, described Barr’s independent streak, saying, “If Bill starts
getting the tweet treatment, Bill is a tough guy. He’s a tough, tough guy. Not that Jeff Sessions wasn’t, but I don’t think Bill’s just
going to sit there and take it. I think he would make sure that the president understood that it is not really a smart thing to be
lambasting the attorney general.”

Now, Barr is being cast by the liberal cable channels and others as an unscrupulous political hack attached to the president’s leash.
On CBS’s “60 Minutes” on Sunday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that Barr “may be whitewashing” his summary of the
report. Such accusations represent an unlikely turn of events for a 68-year-old professional with an impeccable record and a career
more behind him than in front of him.

For Fox News devotees in southern Ohio and other Trump strongholds, nothing from the Mueller investigation has provided cause
to waver from their preferred news source. Meanwhile, even regular viewers of CNN and MSNBC must certainly recognize the straws
being grasped to justify sticking with a conspiracy theory that has been largely debunked — although the expected release of Mueller’s
report this week will probably provide just enough juice for one last effort.

After two years of conjecture from all sides, some hard truths have emerged. Russia did try to influence the 2016 election. Neither
Trump nor his campaign conspired with Russia. The president’s actions did not rise to criminal obstruction of justice. And how and why
this all began may well turn out to be the most troubling story of all.

... It would behoove serious journalists to put aside their political biases and delve into a story that might actually be worthy of Watergate
comparisons — even if it includes the painful admission that Fox News has been right all along.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/04/15/admit-it-fox-news-has-been-right-all-along/?utm_term=.a9d5c01b4f78