Hes guilty of obstructing an investigation that was framing him for Russian collussion with falsified intel by the DNC. Liberal logic at its best.
It gets better, dnc is blaming Barr now for not providing full report. Well report is at a secure office that anyone of them can come to and read. Only 2 senators have, both GOP.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
There's a public debate now over whether you can be found guilty of obstruction if you know you're innocent of any underlying crime.
When Martha Stewart was charged with obstruction, she thought her stock trades broke the law based on receiving insider information. The investigators found the trades were not illegal, but she altered her calendar and made false statements to hide facts from the investigators. That was actual obstruction since she thought she had done something illegal.
Bill Clinton lied under oath, which constituted perjury. His lies also served to misdirect investigators from finding the truth -- obstruction of justice. Both were charged in the Articles of Impeachment against him.
Trump always knew the Russia Collusion accusations were bogus. Hence, anything he might have done to hinder the investigation theoretically can't be labeled obstruction. Nothing to hide = nothing to stop investigators from discovering.
Failing to cooperate in your own investigation is not "obstruction." You have the right to not help investigators gather evidence against you. It's in the Constitution. Trump's WH handed over 1M+ documents, cooperated fully in all subpoenas and interview requests, and in the end never fired Mueller.
In all my days, this has been the most cooperative administration in a top-level investigation I've ever seen. After Watergate, Fast & furious, Benghazi, the IRS abuses, Clinton's email server, Monica, White Water, Travel Gate, missing FBI files, Iran-Contra, and so on, the transparency of the Trump administration is like night vs. day. Not once did Trump invoke executive privilege.