Damn gerbil wheels are turning again.  Some questions regarding the timeline of the "spokes people" for the fake news come into question:

David Hogg
1) Stated during interview he was at home during the shooting and heard about it from the news.  (Kids who stay home or leave school early watch the news)

2) Stated he then grabbed his camera and rode his bicycle 3 miles to MSD

     a) Shooting lasted 4 minutes, pretty sure it would take him longer than that to get his stuff and ride there.  Say first 911 call came in at the 30 second mark. Then the dispatcher had to alert the PD.  So if the news is scanning the radios, it would also take them more time to actually break and "this just in" story.  His interview from inside the closet, gun fire can be heard in the background (real?).

     b) Once on campus, he had to make his way through the PD who was there and evacuating students and go into the building doors.  Then find where the shooter was and go inside a class room.  All within 4 minutes of the 1st shot being fired

3) He then was able to get through phone lines and call CNN to say he was at the shooting (said during interview).  Did he have them on speed dial already for a private CNN line and not the 800 number?  Possible because he did visit them prior.  Then the reporters had to locate him.

4) During his on site interviews, he seemed to be trying to memorize lines.

5) His dad after leaving the FBI, started his own crisis management company.  His father was also on the 9/11 crisis team (all public record)

6) No mention of his sister during interviews, who was shot by Cruz.  Wouldn't that be mentioned at some point?

7) Some yearbook photos of him at another school (most likely fake, but doesn't help)

Emma Gonzales

1) Video (deleted) of her doing a cooking show titled "NYU".  She had long hair.

2) Her mother is David Hoggs aunt (fathers (FBI agent) sister)

3) No mention of the relationship ("oh, we're cousins")

Side Notes:

March for our Lives permit applied for before the shooting happened

Many "students" interviewed can be seen laughing/smiling seconds prior to the interview starting.  Then get into character and all sad/serious.

CNN town hall, JROTC student claims he was given questions to ask, but refused. So he was denied entry


So just with the 2 main spokes people for the March for our Lives, this raises more questions.  I'm going off of memory, so anyone can correct if I'm mistaken about any info above.

Damn gerbil wheels are turning again.  Some questions regarding the timeline of the "spokes people" for the fake news come into question:

David Hogg
1) Stated during interview he was at home during the shooting and heard about it from the news.  (Kids who stay home or leave school early watch the news)

2) Stated he then grabbed his camera and rode his bicycle 3 miles to MSD

     a) Shooting lasted 4 minutes, pretty sure it would take him longer than that to get his stuff and ride there.  Say first 911 call came in at the 30 second mark. Then the dispatcher had to alert the PD.  So if the news is scanning the radios, it would also take them more time to actually break and "this just in" story.  His interview from inside the closet, gun fire can be heard in the background (real?).

     b) Once on campus, he had to make his way through the PD who was there and evacuating students and go into the building doors.  Then find where the shooter was and go inside a class room.  All within 4 minutes of the 1st shot being fired

3) He then was able to get through phone lines and call CNN to say he was at the shooting (said during interview).  Did he have them on speed dial already for a private CNN line and not the 800 number?  Possible because he did visit them prior.  Then the reporters had to locate him.

4) During his on site interviews, he seemed to be trying to memorize lines.

5) His dad after leaving the FBI, started his own crisis management company.  His father was also on the 9/11 crisis team (all public record)

6) No mention of his sister during interviews, who was shot by Cruz.  Wouldn't that be mentioned at some point?

7) Some yearbook photos of him at another school (most likely fake, but doesn't help)

Emma Gonzales

1) Video (deleted) of her doing a cooking show titled "NYU".  She had long hair.

2) Her mother is David Hoggs aunt (fathers (FBI agent) sister)

3) No mention of the relationship ("oh, we're cousins")

Side Notes:

March for our Lives permit applied for before the shooting happened

Many "students" interviewed can be seen laughing/smiling seconds prior to the interview starting.  Then get into character and all sad/serious.

CNN town hall, JROTC student claims he was given questions to ask, but refused. So he was denied entry


So just with the 2 main spokes people for the March for our Lives, this raises more questions.  I'm going off of memory, so anyone can correct if I'm mistaken about any info above.

We need a separate section for conspiracy theories.
It makes gun owners look nuts if this is the first thing that pops up.

The school shooting in Maryland a week or 2 later disproves their entire narrative.
But they continue to push this story and agenda

The school shooting in Maryland a week or 2 later disproves their entire narrative.
But they continue to push this story and agenda

Yes it does. A good guy with a gun saved lives and not a story

The school shooting in Maryland a week or 2 later disproves their entire narrative.
But they continue to push this story and agenda

And Cruz used 10 rd mags.

I talked with my family about 911 and some of them shut down but others just wouldn't say anything. The official version doesn't make any sense, but many people who noticed the inconsistencies don't want to be lumped in with the David Icke/Alex Jones crowd.

On the other hand the media lies all the time, and it's especially insulting to out intelligence at the moment when they call us racist terrorist etc and insist that banning 30 round mags will somehow make a positive difference even though all evidence points to the contrary.

I've decided to take a policy of picking and choosing what to believe by what evidence is available, and what can be realistically accomplished by sharing that information.

Remember the aim of cointelpro is to discredit movements by planting people who say crazy stuff in order to make organizations and movements look unhinged.

Careful you aren't doing the agencies work for them

I talked with my family about 911 and some of them shut down but others just wouldn't say anything. The official version doesn't make any sense, but many people who noticed the inconsistencies don't want to be lumped in with the David Icke/Alex Jones crowd.

On the other hand the media lies all the time, and it's especially insulting to out intelligence at the moment when they call us racist terrorist etc and insist that banning 30 round mags will somehow make a positive difference even though all evidence points to the contrary.

I've decided to take a policy of picking and choosing what to believe by what evidence is available, and what can be realistically accomplished by sharing that information.

Remember the aim of cointelpro is to discredit movements by planting people who say crazy stuff in order to make organizations and movements look unhinged.

Careful you aren't doing the agencies work for them

Don't get me started on 9/11.

The school submitted a redacted report about what they knew about Cruz.  But I guess the person who did the redacting just used a sharpie.  So when filtered, the entire report was visible.

Basically it states the school knew about Cruz's mental health.  They removed him from the SPED class and put him with regular kids.  Even after he was requesting to be put back because he was showing progress in the SPED class, but not the regular ones, actually getting worst. 

He had a learning disability his entire life.  So all this is in hind sight, but if allowed to stay in SPED and graduate, would things have been different?  Once denied the 2nd time to go back to SPED, he dropped out of school.  Then the shooting happened days later.