Kate Brown sounds like treason to me.
I'm not sure how you get from "common sense gun solutions" and "more sensible gun policy" and refusing a presidential order to make the National Guard available to "treason". Oh, wait... yes I do.
Every other sentence in that editorial from the governor is faulty in one way or another, but here's a good example:
"Confronting this problem demands that we take a
pragmatic approach to gun reform. Universal background checks are
a good start, and so is a ban on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. These are weapons of war designed to cause mass casualties, not toys. And to say they’re for sport or even
self-defense goes beyond what is reasonable."
Note all the code-word euphemisms: "pragmatic", "good start", and "beyond reasonable" reveal the true agenda: the only solution (the "final solution"?) that can "work" is to disarm all non-government agents, i.e. "civilians". "Pragmatic" means that we have to do something that "works" and can't be bogged down with abstract or theoretical concepts like "rights" and "the law" and the Constitution. "Good start" obviously means that any of the things she lists, including the bans on certain items, are merely the "first step" in a nearly never-ending list of demands until an armed citizenry is disarmed. And "beyond reasonable" in another attempt to make those who disagree (in this case with civilian disarmament in particular) with any view they state as being "unreasonable", "irrational", "delusional" "deplorable" "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic — Islamophobic — you name it" and "irredeemable".
Treasonous indeed!