Tuesday, when Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared, “no one is above the law,” her target was President Donald Trump – but she did far more damage to former Vice President Joe Biden.

Democrats are very excited by a few words in a phone call between the President of the United States and the new, reform-oriented anti-corruption President of Ukraine. Those words asked to open the investigation and to get at the truth.

Most Americans will ignore an attack on investigating corruption as just politics.

However, Ukraine is not the only site of scandalous self-enrichment by Hunter Biden. China is an even bigger center of money going to the former vice president’s son – money which would not have gone to him if his name had been Hunter Smith.

Peter Schweizer has become a remarkable researcher and writer about corruption. In a May, 11, 2019 New York Post article, he wrote extensively about the Bidens and China.

The investment firm Hunter Biden operated (along with former-Secretary of State John Kerry’s stepson Chris Heinz and their family friend and operative Devon Archer) in his dealings with China was Rosemont Seneca Partners, which formed in 2009.

By 2010, Hunter Biden and Archer “were in China meeting with top Chinese officials,” Schweizer wrote. By the way, Rosemont also partnered with the Thornton Group, which is led by James Bulger (the nephew of the infamous mobster James “Whitey” Bulger).

In 2013, Hunter Biden flew to China with his dad on Air Force Two. Within two weeks, Rosemont secured what eventually grew into a $1.5 billion private equity deal with a part of the Bank of China (which is owned by the Chinese Communist Party). So, as Schweizer put it, “the Chinese government-funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president.”

Newt Gingrich: Speaker Pelosi, THIS is the investigation Congress needs to do right now

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/newt-gingrich-speaker-pelosi-investigation-congress

Is this spin?  Is this misinformation? Is it true?  Who knows, but where there's smoke. . .

As I understand it there is reason to investigate both Trump and the Bidens

As I understand it there is reason to investigate both Trump and the Bidens

You could say that for all politicians. Even Obama who so many still see as the golden boy. Fast and Furious, Solyndra, Benghazi, IRS targeting, etc.

So what’s your point? Topic is investigation into Hunter Biden...

Certainly Biden could be independently investigated but Trump's problematic comments end up being tied to a Biden investigation. Because of that any objective serious desire to investigate would look at both otherwise it is clearly just political. If we are going to say Biden's comments were wrong and need to be investigated then we have to say the same for Trump and vice versa. We can't give one side a pass while going after the other, otherwise it clearly has nothing to do with a real investigation and upholding of justice.

To be intellectually honest we would really have to investigate both or neither. But no, the two sides only want to investigate the other guy and excuse anything their own guy did.

Why do you always seem to use the pronoun “we”? 

Why does any investigation HAVE to look into both? How about investigating because there is reason and see what EVIDENCE comes out?  On their OWN merits. Not just hearsay, second hand uncorroborated statements, etc?

Because that's my preferred gender pronoun and you have to recognize my gender

Because the logic justifying investigating one also justifies investigating the other. The issue in question is fairly similar and both Biden's comments and Trump's comments reason to suspect possible illegal activity.  So I say investigate both, otherwise it is just hypocrisy.

Because that's my preferred gender pronoun and you have to recognize my gender

No I don't !   

No I don't !   

Whaddya think about Hunter Biden?   

Perhaps a more germane and pressing question is: Where is Hunter Biden?

Over a week since the renewed controversy, and not even a sighting, much less a peep.

I guess since he did nothing wrong he feels no need to defend his actions. On the other hand, if he did appear in public he might have a hard time showing his resume and job skills that would justify the Ukraine and Chinese money he took home. Just sayin'...

The HPD troll is attempting to make it look like he has allies that agree with him/her/it?

Your gender is a “we”?  I know you were trying to be smart. But you use we since you are trying to give yourself a sense of relationship to the group. When you are trying to relate to your opinion and experiences. It’s plain to see and that you responded with a wisecrack like that is telling.

And the investigations are about their comments. :facepalm:

Why does an investigation into one necessarily tie into another? If the evidence leads that way, then so be it. Is Trump playing his “4D chess” and Dems took the bait?

I’m not saying an investigation into Trump isn’t warranted. I don’t care either way. One should take whistleblower allegations seriously. However, look at the evidence and credibility. Also the reported timing of who acted on what “facts” and when they were released.