i'm still surprised that aerial fireworks aren't considered to be within the definition of "firearm" under HRS 134-1
"Firearm" means any weapon, for which the operating force is an explosive, including but not limited to pistols, revolvers, rifles, shotguns, automatic firearms, noxious gas projectors, mortars, bombs, and cannon.
is the only distinction between an aerial firework and a shotgun due to the traditional notion of the term "weapon"?
could aerial fireworks be used as a "weapon"? conversely, if i only do target shooting with a rifle and i never intend for it to be a "weapon", then will it still be considered a "firearm" under Hawaii law? is the term "weapon" defined by the intended use of the object, or is it defined by its potential use? if the dalai lama had an ar-15, would that ar-15 still be considered a "firearm" if the dalai lama never intended to use it as a "weapon"?
is a golf ball launcher considered a "weapon" if it utilizes blanks as a propellant? what about a PVC pipe potato cannon that uses hairspray as a propellant?