One thing to add into any testimony is that LEO are civilians and would be mandated to leave all 10+ magazines in their armory at the ends of their shifts. They can't bring them home because once off duty they are no longer operating in any official capacity and therefore in violation of the law.
And if it does pass, I would sue to see the armory records of turn-ins at end of shift. In fact I would do it now as I'm pretty sure every LEO in Hawaii takes their pistol mags home. LEO are civilians, they just perform a job and are employed by the government. No different than firefighters or the secretary working for the County Clerk.
The info on the CA mag law had some great info.
This is what I am putting together to submit:
Basis for laws need to be based on facts and rational thought, as opposed knee jerk reaction based on fear and emotion.
FACT: Response times to my residence have been documented in the 10-15 min range in two recent incidents. My residence is approximately (3) blocks away from HPD main station.
FACT: Recent incidents of attacks and robberies have been by groups of perpetrators.
FACT: This bill cited information from past shootings on used of high capacity magazines in shootings. High capacity magazines were NOT used in recent shootings in CA. Fresno 2017 and Oakland 2012 were "CA Legal" 10 round mags.
FACT: Magazine capacity laws cite disproportionate use against LE as a basis. 2016 FBI report shows an average of 9.1 rounds used against LE.