Learning pods gain popularity amid pandemic but raise questions over equity
The arguments raised in this story are no different than when calculators and PCs were becoming mainstream. Families with the means to afford these learning tools were getting an "unfair advantage" over kids with poorer families.
In other words, the poorer kids will be competing with the richer kids for jobs, and having access to things like high-speed Internet will be the deciding factor.
Maybe they have to take a new perspective on the problem. It isn't that "Ritchie Rich" has better electronics. It's that the government, who pretends to be the sole arbiter of "free education" (at tax payer expense) chooses not to offer these resources to "disadvantaged" families.
If, say, 30% of the kids in a school have the means to pay $10K-$15K per child per year for in-home Leaning Pods, that REDUCES the demand on public schools by almost a third. Are they so blind they can't figure out that equates to a 30% increase in funding for the kids that are still attending public schools? If fixed costs are controlled, then there is plenty of money to spend on the "disadvantaged students" and give them the same (or better) resources.
The district could offer free or steeply discounted internet services to their students. They could hire a few of the professional Learning Pod teacher types to offer the same classes to public school enrollees. And, if the families see the public education QUALITY reaching that of the private options, it's logical they would opt back into the public system -- which necessarily qualifies the school for more funding.
Competition is a good thing for CONSUMERS. The only ones who don't like it are the ones on the losing end of the "game".
Our schools are run by teacher's unions. Maybe it's time we started Parent and Student Unions, to fight for a fairer share of the education budget.
It's been a long time since Hawaii's state-run school board system was examined. We are the only state in the country that does this. Every other state funds schools at the city and county level, placing the decisions and spending at the local community level. I've heard the supply warehouse for the state's schools is jam-packed with stuff they bought over the years (at someone's benefit) and was never used -- or, in many cases, needed.
Lingle tried to address that very problem, but she was given zero support by the Legislature. Nothing will change until those with high-paying government jobs are ousted and the system revamped to produce positive results vs. funneling ever-increasing gobs of cash to them.
I grew up in some of the best public schools
in the world.
I had the choice of Spanish, French, German, Latin, and Mandarin
in school from 7th to 12th grades.
Math, sciences, history, and shop classes to cover the spectrum.
Plus about any sport you could imagine. I did a 5 minute mile
when I was 14 years old.
Then Democrats took over and unions started to rule.
That school district today is a Ghetto.
Inspector and I grew up in the same general area
and he may concur. I probably Egged his high school
after a football game.
Solution is to go all private schools and taxes go to vouchers.
Let parents select what their kids learn, not racist
social justice workers AKA union teachers.
We ALL want all kids to grow up and live happy and
free lives regardless of race or cultural backgrounds.
I'm done.