Too bad we've only got (Read 18823 times)

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #60 on: October 30, 2020, 10:34:06 PM »
So you are saying masks are like scientists that believed the earth was flat? Then why in America is covid spiking?  We probably use masks the least vs asian countries with low covid numbers.  Is there an explanation for that?

And Puna, yes most of the protection of masks come from "source control"  Its why the people who are sick are the most important people to wear masks.  Less droplets are exhaled.  No one is saying masks are 100%, its about bettering the odds.   Are there any studies that show masks cause more covid?  Isn't everything past that just a benefit?  Even if you believe it helps very little.  Even 10% is 10% less spread. 

There's psychological benefits of masks too, Touch your face less be more wary of contact.  Keep the distance.  That also helps with spread.

Go back and review the FACTS.

Scientists and doctors always predicted the virus would become less prolific in Summer due to warm temps and sunlight.  They also predicted that the Fall and Winter months would cause an increase in infections.  People in Hawaii are wearing masks everywhere I go.  Even though we don't have actual seasons like the mainland, we are also seeing increased infection numbers.  It's not a mystery, nor is it being caused by people refusing to wear masks.

Get a grip.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

punaperson

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #61 on: October 30, 2020, 10:35:57 PM »
please quote "studies" and show how many are reinfected
the numbers are less than 200 "possible" people reinfected
currently, there are over 45.600,000 positive tests
less than 200 is a infinitively small amount...
If you can save even one false positive asymptomatic no-live-viral load non-infectious "case"... smh.

As per the original post, note that while Idaho has a significant number of legislators who are aware of the actual science, there appear to be none in Hawaii. Or at least none that have ever made a public statement.

And neither the mayor (Lyin' Harry) nor the governor (Moron Ige) nor the state Department of Health will answer any of my questions regarding the rate of asymptomatic cases of the positive tests, whether any positive test cases are ever tested for live viral loads, whether there is a standard level of amplification for the RT-PCR tests, and if so what that level is, and if not, which amplification levels have what rates of positive returns, what are the ages and number and type of comorbidities of each death in Hawaii, what are the benchmark criteria for rescinding the mask mandates, the gathering size mandates, etc., etc., etc.? Why don't they want us to know those, and other, relevant facts? No help from any politician to find out. Fucking statist fascists.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2020, 11:18:21 PM by punaperson »

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #62 on: October 30, 2020, 10:40:03 PM »
Every country is not the same.  Different weather, different cultures, different habits, ... 

If Asia has fewer infections, you think it might be because they bow instead of hugging, kissing and shaking hands?  That's just one example off the top of my head.  Maybe they are by habit more sanitary?  Maybe they are healthier as a society?  You really want to boil all Asians down to wearing masks?  They wear masks normally because of horrible pollution, no catalytic converters, and in some areas medical requirements.  They have a higher rate of diseases like Tuberculosis.  In the infectious stage, they may wear masks.  If they are around people diagnosed, again they wear masks.  Wearing masks and having lower COVID infections are not linked without EVIDENCE.  You're making a deductive conclusion based on potentially erroneous belief in cause and effect.

Now that I think of it, we have many more Mexicans, guns and McDonald's restaurants in the US than Japan .....   Might not be the masks.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

punaperson

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #63 on: October 30, 2020, 11:03:34 PM »
So you are saying masks are like scientists that believed the earth was flat? Then why in America is covid spiking?  We probably use masks the least vs asian countries with low covid numbers.  Is there an explanation for that?

Viruses spread until they are attenuated to the point of being rarely infectious or more commonly when the population achieves "herd immunity" (and there is a great debate as to what percentage of the population will need to have immunity, either from being infected of being successfully vaccinated, in order to achieve that state). One hypothesis re the Asian rates is that since most corona viruses originate there is that the people of that region have much more substantial T-cell cross-cell immunity due to much more frequent exposure to similar viruses.

And Puna, yes most of the protection of masks come from "source control"  Its why the people who are sick are the most important people to wear masks.  Less droplets are exhaled.  No one is saying masks are 100%, its about bettering the odds.   Are there any studies that show masks cause more covid?  Isn't everything past that just a benefit?  Even if you believe it helps very little.  Even 10% is 10% less spread.

Some large droplet may be impeded by various kinds of masks. The problem, as evidenced by the RCTs showing that masks (even quality medical masks) don't impede the spread of a virus, is that it is mostly spread by aerosols, not large droplets, and masks don't block aerosols. During this whole shitshow I've heard two people cough in retail stores, and they each coughed one time. Never heard anyone sneeze nor anyone scream or sing. The CDC asserts that one needs to be within 6 feet of a known infected person for at least 15 minutes to have a significant chance of getting infected (why 65% of the traced cases are to "home" and 15% to "work"). When was the last time you were shopping in a retail outlet and spent at least 15 minutes within 6 feet of a stranger? Yeah, like never. It's "safety theater". There is mounting evidence that masks cause health problems, but so far none that specifically indicate it spreads covid at a higher rate than no masks... though with all the people I see constantly touching their masks and contaminating them, and not disposing of them every two hours and/or washing them in 140 degree water every day, I wouldn't be surprised if at least bacterial infections are increased. Where'd you come up with 10%? The article you linked to said 2%, and that wasn't an RCT, just an observational study with no controls and could be completely wrong. You're on the slippery slope of manufactured statistics with no rigorous scientific backing, just like the people who claim we have to ban certain guns or magazines or whatever because it's possible that there will be a .03% lower overall crime rate if that's done. Garbage. What has been created is a mass hysteria (aka "the madness of crowds") with people screaming at and threatening people for not wearing a mask when they are outside and not even near anyone else. One could almost look at it as an experiment in mind control and population control. What's next?

There's psychological benefits of masks too, Touch your face less be more wary of contact.  Keep the distance.  That also helps with spread.

What's the "psychological benefit"? Falsely believing that you are protected or that you are protecting someone else though you don't have the virus and dub yourself a superior compassionate caring virtue signaler even though it's not true? I seriously doubt the people I've observed touching/adjusting their mask are touching their face less than without a mask. If anything re distance, they likely think that since they have a mask on and are thus protected/protecting, that the distance thing doesn't matter as much. That's the excuse Fauci gave when he recommended against mask wearing: "a false sense of security".

The politicians are all ignoramuses or liars. Maybe both. I'll let you decide.

« Last Edit: October 30, 2020, 11:19:12 PM by punaperson »

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #64 on: October 30, 2020, 11:22:24 PM »
Psychological effects?

What about the millions and millions of people who paid for braces, cosmetic dentistry, teeth whitening, cheek and lip injections, facelifts, eye lifts, and all the other facial cosmetic or reconstructive surgery? 

Now they are being told to cover up their investments in their appearances.  Imagine if you spent the time, pain, trouble and money to do any of that, and now you look like every other person in line at the local grocery store?

I bet a bunch of them are P.O.'ed!!
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

omnigun

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #65 on: October 31, 2020, 06:28:57 AM »
Yes reinfection is rate but it's growing, studies have shown that immunity is fading. Less antibodies etc.  Is not like chicken pox where once infected your are pretty safe for life. 

Yes studies have shown winter will be worse than summer but Asia has similar weather to us.   Why are we only exploding?   I can't accurately factor in culture differences,  not a scientist. I'll see if there are any studies done on that. 

Psychology benefits include caution.  That's how we combat unhealthy activities like smoking. Unless your all think the science isn't correct on that too. 

Herd immunity wouldn't apply here.  Not sure what study you are looking at but this is a new virus. No one has much immunity and it spread very quickly in China and it doesn't now,  so if they had genetic immunity we shouldn't see that happen. 

What studies show that masks cause health problems?  If it's about oxygen levels,  we already it doesn't effect that.  I do agree there's need to be cautious, and I'll be honest I'm not a scientist. But I feel comfortable that if a majority of experts tell me something it's true. Just like I don't question doctors when I'm sick.  If 9/10 same the same thing I'll believe them.  Don't think that's mind control.  This trust applies to all facets of life some people have specialized skills.   You rely on them to do their job.   If 9 engineers say this is how you build this building safely you listen.  Don't search for the one that is different or your own opinion.  Don't blindly follow but most things are not conspiracy theories.  From everything I've read and all the scientists across the world, I believe that masks help.  I guess I can't convince anyone here.   

macsak

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #66 on: October 31, 2020, 07:22:14 AM »
Yes reinfection is rate but it's growing, studies have shown that immunity is fading. Less antibodies etc.  Is not like chicken pox where once infected your are pretty safe for life. 

Yes studies have shown winter will be worse than summer but Asia has similar weather to us.   Why are we only exploding?   I can't accurately factor in culture differences,  not a scientist. I'll see if there are any studies done on that. 

Psychology benefits include caution.  That's how we combat unhealthy activities like smoking. Unless your all think the science isn't correct on that too. 

Herd immunity wouldn't apply here.  Not sure what study you are looking at but this is a new virus. No one has much immunity and it spread very quickly in China and it doesn't now,  so if they had genetic immunity we shouldn't see that happen. 

What studies show that masks cause health problems?  If it's about oxygen levels,  we already it doesn't effect that.  I do agree there's need to be cautious, and I'll be honest I'm not a scientist. But I feel comfortable that if a majority of experts tell me something it's true. Just like I don't question doctors when I'm sick.  If 9/10 same the same thing I'll believe them.  Don't think that's mind control.  This trust applies to all facets of life some people have specialized skills.   You rely on them to do their job.   If 9 engineers say this is how you build this building safely you listen.  Don't search for the one that is different or your own opinion.  Don't blindly follow but most things are not conspiracy theories.  From everything I've read and all the scientists across the world, I believe that masks help.  I guess I can't convince anyone here.

1 to a few is "growing" correct
but it's not a huge problem you make it out to be

antibodies are not the only thing that gives you immunity
perhaps you should science before you post...

macsak

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #67 on: October 31, 2020, 07:23:53 AM »
Yes reinfection is rate but it's growing, studies have shown that immunity is fading. Less antibodies etc.  Is not like chicken pox where once infected your are pretty safe for life. 

Yes studies have shown winter will be worse than summer but Asia has similar weather to us.   Why are we only exploding?   I can't accurately factor in culture differences,  not a scientist. I'll see if there are any studies done on that. 

Psychology benefits include caution.  That's how we combat unhealthy activities like smoking. Unless your all think the science isn't correct on that too. 

Herd immunity wouldn't apply here.  Not sure what study you are looking at but this is a new virus. No one has much immunity and it spread very quickly in China and it doesn't now,  so if they had genetic immunity we shouldn't see that happen. 

What studies show that masks cause health problems?  If it's about oxygen levels,  we already it doesn't effect that.  I do agree there's need to be cautious, and I'll be honest I'm not a scientist. But I feel comfortable that if a majority of experts tell me something it's true. Just like I don't question doctors when I'm sick.  If 9/10 same the same thing I'll believe them.  Don't think that's mind control.  This trust applies to all facets of life some people have specialized skills.   You rely on them to do their job.   If 9 engineers say this is how you build this building safely you listen.  Don't search for the one that is different or your own opinion.  Don't blindly follow but most things are not conspiracy theories.  From everything I've read and all the scientists across the world, I believe that masks help.  I guess I can't convince anyone here.

you should read what puna posted and maybe your eyes would be opened

but i doubt it

macsak

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #68 on: October 31, 2020, 07:24:56 AM »
Yes reinfection is rate but it's growing, studies have shown that immunity is fading. Less antibodies etc.  Is not like chicken pox where once infected your are pretty safe for life. 

Yes studies have shown winter will be worse than summer but Asia has similar weather to us.   Why are we only exploding?   I can't accurately factor in culture differences,  not a scientist. I'll see if there are any studies done on that. 

Psychology benefits include caution.  That's how we combat unhealthy activities like smoking. Unless your all think the science isn't correct on that too. 

Herd immunity wouldn't apply here.  Not sure what study you are looking at but this is a new virus. No one has much immunity and it spread very quickly in China and it doesn't now,  so if they had genetic immunity we shouldn't see that happen. 

What studies show that masks cause health problems?  If it's about oxygen levels,  we already it doesn't effect that.  I do agree there's need to be cautious, and I'll be honest I'm not a scientist. But I feel comfortable that if a majority of experts tell me something it's true. Just like I don't question doctors when I'm sick.  If 9/10 same the same thing I'll believe them.  Don't think that's mind control.  This trust applies to all facets of life some people have specialized skills.   You rely on them to do their job.   If 9 engineers say this is how you build this building safely you listen.  Don't search for the one that is different or your own opinion.  Don't blindly follow but most things are not conspiracy theories.  From everything I've read and all the scientists across the world, I believe that masks help.  I guess I can't convince anyone here.

but you are a scientist at heart...

macsak

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #69 on: October 31, 2020, 07:25:51 AM »
snip

omni is too caught up in the matrix to be red pilled...

ren

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #70 on: October 31, 2020, 08:05:54 AM »

Herd immunity wouldn't apply here.  Not sure what study you are looking at but this is a new virus. No one has much immunity and it spread very quickly in China and it doesn't now,  so if they had genetic immunity we shouldn't see that happen. 

Herd immunity has nothing to do with genetics
Deeds Not Words

omnigun

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #71 on: October 31, 2020, 08:14:25 AM »
omni is too caught up in the matrix to be red pilled...

Never want to be "red" pilled.  If I took a pill it would be purple.  A mix of red and blue.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #72 on: October 31, 2020, 08:26:18 AM »
Never want to be "red" pilled.  If I took a pill it would be purple.  A mix of red and blue.

So given a choice between two pills, you'd choose both?  That's not a choice.  It's an attempt to avoid commitment.  A compromise.

You only get one of the pills.  Whichever you take first is the one you live with.  Once you've taken one, there are no more choices available.  This isn't a f#@king restaurant!

Did you even see the Matrix?  All the members of the Nebuchadnezzar crew took the red pill.  They didn't have a choice of a second pill.

Red or Blue.  There is no "Take 'em both if you can't decide."   :wtf:

Red = Reality / Republican
Blue = Obliviousness / Democrat

You want a combination?  Damn!!   :rofl:
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

macsak

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #73 on: October 31, 2020, 08:30:03 AM »
Never want to be "red" pilled.  If I took a pill it would be purple.  A mix of red and blue.

i heard "from a friend' you need the blue pill...

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #74 on: October 31, 2020, 09:07:10 AM »
Herd immunity has nothing to do with genetics

An immunity not created through a vaccine or introduction of a disease to trigger an immune response is called INNATE IMMUNITY, or natural immunity.

An example in humans would be our skin.  It protects our highly sensitive nervous system from pathogens that already have access to our bodies.  They are kept from infecting the internal structures and organs.  Clotting of blood is another example.  If the skin is damaged, the blood clots to seal the wound against infections.  These are mechanisms that have evolved in vertebrates to actually make us immune from the pathological agents in our environment.

Every germ-fighting mechanism in our bodies has evolved over time to compensate for "design flaws" that proved to be vulnerable to infections.  We often say "immune" when in reality we should say, "infection fighting mechanisms," because they only act when a specific pathogen is detected in the body -- i.e. you're already infected, but your body is taking care of it.

When fighting a new virus, unless it acts nearly identical to another infection which our bodies already recognize, the body uses the adaptive immune system, aka the acquired immune system.  This is what most people understand as immunity, because most vaccines are designed to trigger these immunity responses in our bodies.  Once the antibodies are created, they provide some degree of immunity for some amount of time.

Acquired immunity creates immunological memory after an initial response to a specific pathogen, and leads to an enhanced response to subsequent encounters with that pathogen.  It's more specific to a pathogen than innate immunity.

Acquired immunity normally does not prevent infections, but rather it provides an ENHANCED RESPONSE to an infection.  The body has been "taught" how to fight a specific pathogen, and it can produce the appropriate antibodies in response. 

So, SCIENCE tells us that EVEN IF you have been vaccinated or infected in the past, you are not technically immune from reinfection.  The body, however, has been prepared with a blueprint on how to fight the infection by virtue of seeing the pathogen before.

In short (too late?), we can have immunity from COVID-19 and still get reinfected.  Reinfection rates, therefore, are irrelevant. 

If you need an example of this, look up chicken pox and reinfections in older adults (shingles).  Even though we all have been immunized against chicken pox, either through infection or vaccination, the immunity is created from the live virus.  Shingles occur when the virus in the body reactivates -- normally decades after childhood infection.

Arguing over reinfection probabilities and rates is pointless.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

ren

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #75 on: October 31, 2020, 09:13:30 AM »
can we get on with our regular lives? There is risk in driving my car during the day of the week and time of day. There is risk when I ride my bike in the bike lane. There is even risk when I run on a sidewalk and cross intersections.
Deeds Not Words

omnigun

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #76 on: October 31, 2020, 09:17:46 AM »
i heard "from a friend' you need the blue pill...

Stop projecting  :rofl:

omnigun

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #77 on: October 31, 2020, 09:19:22 AM »
So given a choice between two pills, you'd choose both?  That's not a choice.  It's an attempt to avoid commitment.  A compromise.

You only get one of the pills.  Whichever you take first is the one you live with.  Once you've taken one, there are no more choices available.  This isn't a f#@king restaurant!

Did you even see the Matrix?  All the members of the Nebuchadnezzar crew took the red pill.  They didn't have a choice of a second pill.

Red or Blue.  There is no "Take 'em both if you can't decide."   :wtf:

Red = Reality / Republican
Blue = Obliviousness / Democrat

You want a combination?  Damn!!   :rofl:

This is why independents are getting endangered everyone wants to box people into either side.  What do I do if I believe in parts of both sides?   Suck wind and get 50% of what I want?

macsak

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #78 on: October 31, 2020, 09:42:59 AM »
Never want to be "red" pilled.  If I took a pill it would be purple.  A mix of red and blue.

i know you won't do it, because you are only a "scientist at heart", but google "casedemic"
and research how the PCR test works ("pcr doubling")
and what it detects (portions of mRNA, not the virus itself, including a sequence of DNA that is located on every human's DNA))
and the difference between "positive tests" and "cases"

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Too bad we've only got
« Reply #79 on: October 31, 2020, 09:43:13 AM »
This is why independents are getting endangered everyone wants to box people into either side.  What do I do if I believe in parts of both sides?   Suck wind and get 50% of what I want?

There is no compromise for Democrats.  There never has been.  Having to split non-Democrats into multiple affiliations only dilutes the GOP and gives the Dems a better chance of gaining/retaining power.

Independents usually lean either conservative or liberal.  That makes them more GOP or Democrat.  Since there's really no independent party (it's just a label -- e.g. Bernie Sanders calling himself "Independent" in Congress and running as a Democrat).  It's a fact.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw