Groveler,
Do me a favor and reread what I wrote. I never said China is our greatest holder of debt. I said they own “a lot” of it. It is not the same thing. They are the largest holder of our debt from an unfriendly country. But I do feel they own enough of our debt to create the scenario I just described. Please make sure you quote me correctly, thanks.
As far as blue state control of coastal states are concerned you forgot they also could easily take control of the transportation of goods in and out of their state. So it’s not just the ports they control. It would be easy for them to starve a large swath of our country if that area wanted to secede and did not do as the blue states please. CA has already tried to distance themselves from certain red states by not allowing government and government employees to do certain business with those states. It is not a stretch to think they could cut them off completely during a time of civil war or government overthrow. I can’t speak for the other states but CA also produces a lot. They still have some small manufacturing and a lot of agriculture and farming. So you say they don’t produce but you are incorrect. They produce a lot. Still. Arguably not as much as they used to. And they still produce power. Not enough for themselves which is why they get the rest of what they need from AZ, NV and UT.
If you reread what I said I stated that when NV, AZ and UT turn blue we will be in a bad tenable position. Why? Because those states provide power and some food to the coastal states on the west coast. What that means is that those states will be in lockstep with the coastal states. You need to look at the bigger picture. It is not just the coastal states that are blue. NV, AZ and UT are in danger of turning blue and come under the control of those who want to fundamentally change the US towards Socialism. That is what this thread is all about. AZ is turning blue. It has been purple for a long time. My statement to Kuleana on how how our country may have a civil war or be overthrown will occur when enough states are blue and under control of those who will have the power to make those changes happen after they bankrupt the Federal Government. It is my opinion only.
And while I agree that we shouldn’t listen to what the government tells us, and that we should be self sufficient like you are, the problem I stated is that there is a huge portion of our population who do listen to our government. They see the value of government control and Socialism because that is what they were taught. Right or wrong. And is also one of the issues I brought up if you reread what I wrote. You have no control over what others think and do. The issue becomes when the socialist government controls the food chain both farming and distribution, those of us who rely on Sak N Save, Safeway, Kroegers etc for our food (The majority of us) will find grocery stores no longer exist because they have been taken over by the government and we will be forced to go to the government bread and cheese lines to get our food. Like I said, starvation is a powerful tool to make the masses succumb to being controlled. Not all of us are as lucky to be as self sufficient as you are.
"Do me a favor and reread what I wrote. I never said China is our greatest holder of debt. I said they own “a lot” of it. It is not the same thing. They are the largest holder of our debt from an unfriendly country. But I do feel they own enough of our debt to create the scenario I just described. Please make sure you quote me correctly, thanks."
I am guilty of not responding to your exact words. I was responding to the Rhetoric I interpreted from the whole of the paragraph.
I mean Rhetoric in a complementary way.
I used to buy Treasuries, you cannot demand a bond be cashed in, you sell it if you don't want it anymore, someone will buy it or not.
Doesn't affect the Treasury a bit.
If China wants to dump our debt, I'm sure there will be people willing to pay pennies on the dollar for it.
Both of us grew up in California so we know the state. I also spent a fair amount of time in Northern CA.
I had a lot of family in Eastern OR.
I also know a lot of people in Eastern WA.
The rural areas are where most the production and manufacturing occurs in those states.
Most rural areas already want to be separate from the cities and the cities won't let them be free
of the yoke.
I don't think that states will secede, but only the cities and they will not be able to control the resources
of an entire state. For example if Honolulu decided that Hawaii is going to secede, I'm pretty sure the BI
would not go along with it. That is my opinion.
I'm not yet completely self sufficient, yet, but my point was that the cities weak point is, they cannot survive without
the rural areas, since the cites have chased out industry, manufacturing, food production, power generation et al
to rural areas. Now, if you think a government motivated by starving people in cities will mobilize against the rural
areas and you are talking about a Ukrainian style Holodomor. I think that is unlikely. We have way too many "Toys"
at our disposal these days.
Modern Society is highly dependent on complex systems that are easy to disable and hard to fix.
Think 4GW not WWII 3GW war.
Once again that is my opinion.
Good luck in Az and on the Mainland. Part of the reason I located to rural
Hawaii, was its isolation.
Aloha.