Election Fraud Evidence Thread (Read 530101 times)

bass monkey

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1420 on: January 05, 2021, 05:32:21 PM »
Where can I tune in?

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1421 on: January 05, 2021, 06:02:04 PM »
Where can I tune in?

Here's a page that seems to be getting updates.  Total votes counted up to 89% of votes cast.

https://townhall.com/liveblog/2021/01/05/senate-hangs-in-the-balance-as-georgia-special-election-results-roll-in-n199


Saw a tweet that Chatham County has already called a lid on counting for the night.

This is when the unexplainable spike in Democrat-only ballots will happen overnight, even though the counting has halted until 8am.

Right.

 :popcorn:

https://twitter.com/StephenWJCL/status/1346661879612059648?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1346661879612059648%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Fliveblog%2F2021%2F01%2F05%2Fsenate-hangs-in-the-balance-as-georgia-special-election-results-roll-in-n199

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1422 on: January 05, 2021, 06:57:33 PM »
The link says 99% done and the D is up 25k votes.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1423 on: January 05, 2021, 07:31:50 PM »
The link says 99% done and the D is up 25k votes.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Noir posted, R is up by 200

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

eyeeatingfish

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1424 on: January 05, 2021, 08:56:35 PM »
We covered this already.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I am not inclined to believe Rudy Giuliani but everytime he made a claim I asked myself "what if what he is saying is true?" and I look into the claims further. So far I just haven't found any of it very convincing. Sometimes there are credibility issues with the witnesses or there are too many red flags in their stories. Other things I have looked into seem to have more probable and convincing explanations than a massive conspiracy.

I will admit I haven't gone through each and everything he has claimed so I don't want to say none of it can be true, its just that so far I haven't found reason to believe any of the claims yet. Additionally, I don't deny that there were instances of voter fraud, there certainly were, just not in numbers large enough to change the election results.

And I am not just relying on news either, I am waiting and watching the court rulings but so far Trump's side hasn't really been winning any either.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2021, 09:11:52 PM by eyeeatingfish »

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1425 on: January 05, 2021, 09:12:02 PM »
The Warnock / Loeffler race was called for Warnock (D) with >99% of expected votes reported.

Warnock (D)            2,213,995   50.46%
Loeffler (R) *            2,173,420   49.54%

The Ossoff / Perdue race is still too close to call (3,560 vote margin), also with >99% of expected votes reported.

Ossoff (D)                2,195,441   50.04%
Perdue (R) *            2,191,881   49.96%

I saw a different total from ABC saying Perdue was ahead by over 1,500 votes.

A "blue checkmark" Twitter user said Loeffler will not be conceding tonight, and is instead heading to DC.   :geekdanc: :thumbsup:
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1426 on: January 05, 2021, 09:19:15 PM »
Looks like all the claims of fraud have been proven false once again.  They had something like 8000+ poll watchers.  Assuming many of those republicans.  They have the most watched and documented election of recent history.   They have the entire nations eyes on them.  And the results are similar to when Trump lost.  The democrats continued to be ahead.  I can't see how there is legitimate mass fraud anymore.  Will wait for the inevitable court cases and the courts decide but our elections looking pretty legit so far. 

hvybarrels

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1427 on: January 05, 2021, 10:30:31 PM »
Nothing to see here. Perfectly legit.

The F in Communism stands for Food

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1428 on: January 06, 2021, 06:08:40 AM »
Nothing to see here. Perfectly legit.



Large voting blocks added at once when counting Atlanta.... sounds perfectly legit

QUIETShooter

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1429 on: January 06, 2021, 06:34:07 AM »
How much of these voters are legitimate voters.  Too many slip through the cracks type of changes were added to accomodate the "pandemic" situation for "safety".  Yeah right.

Also.....

I guess there's not much one can do if some of these voters are "voter whores".  You know, the ones who will mark anybody on their ballot if offered freebies like free turkeys and shit like that.

I'd rather these idiots not vote.  But it's no secret that voter campaigns offering incentives like this has been happening like forever.  Probably more so nowadays.  There should be a law banning this kind of activity.

If you're too lazy or stupid to vote, don't vote.
Sometimes you gotta know when to save your bullets.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1430 on: January 06, 2021, 11:59:48 AM »
They recently discovered in GA that the state is allowing homeless voter registrations using addresses like an office, PO Box, or business to which the voters have no ties.

The law requires homeless voters to register an address that's relevant, such as the park where they live, the homeless shelter charity they sleep at, etc.  Unrelated addresses are not allowed.

They found thousands of homeless or formerly homeless voters all using the same business address.  That's illegal, making those votes invalid. 

The number of such voters could easily indicate a Democrat group registering homeless people with the intent to obtain and vote all of those ballots themselves, not the actual homeless voters.  If the same people from the organizations filling out the registrations also fill out the ballots, the signatures would match, eliminating one of the safeguards against fraud.

This one anomaly represents more than enough votes to steal at least one of the House seats in this run-off.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1431 on: January 06, 2021, 12:08:17 PM »
I am not inclined to believe Rudy Giuliani but everytime he made a claim I asked myself "what if what he is saying is true?" and I look into the claims further. So far I just haven't found any of it very convincing. Sometimes there are credibility issues with the witnesses or there are too many red flags in their stories. Other things I have looked into seem to have more probable and convincing explanations than a massive conspiracy.

I will admit I haven't gone through each and everything he has claimed so I don't want to say none of it can be true, its just that so far I haven't found reason to believe any of the claims yet. Additionally, I don't deny that there were instances of voter fraud, there certainly were, just not in numbers large enough to change the election results.

And I am not just relying on news either, I am waiting and watching the court rulings but so far Trump's side hasn't really been winning any either.

If 1 uses logic and reasoning, it's pretty easy to see there is fraud.  1 doesn't have to wait for a court ruling.  Courts have made mistakes through out history.  A huge example is at the end of WW2 there were 800,000 Nazi soldiers.  Not German soldiers, but Nazi soldiers. Only a few hundred of those were convicted of war crimes.  And only about 25 executed. OJ was found not guilty of murder.  And the list goes on and on.  And Hillary's quote  about a child rapist "I know he did it, but I got the evidence thrown out anyways. Haha".

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1432 on: January 06, 2021, 12:10:27 PM »
How much of these voters are legitimate voters.  Too many slip through the cracks type of changes were added to accomodate the "pandemic" situation for "safety".  Yeah right.

Also.....

I guess there's not much one can do if some of these voters are "voter whores".  You know, the ones who will mark anybody on their ballot if offered freebies like free turkeys and shit like that.

I'd rather these idiots not vote.  But it's no secret that voter campaigns offering incentives like this has been happening like forever.  Probably more so nowadays.  There should be a law banning this kind of activity.

If you're too lazy or stupid to vote, don't vote.

Just because someone is watching a paper being fed thru a machine from a few feet away, doesn't mean fraud can't happen.  Sad that some do not realize this.

Combo of illegitimate voters that Project Veritas brought to light , algorthym of the Dominion machine used once again, and much more can all effect what the poll watchers see.

hvybarrels

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1433 on: January 06, 2021, 12:33:14 PM »
I like how the gaslighters keep sticking to the same tired old talking points even though it does not work any more. Smells like Desperation by Calvin Klein
The F in Communism stands for Food

drck1000

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1434 on: January 06, 2021, 12:38:23 PM »
Just because someone is watching a paper being fed thru a machine from a few feet away, doesn't mean fraud can't happen.  Sad that some do not realize this.

Combo of illegitimate voters that Project Veritas brought to light , algorthym of the Dominion machine used once again, and much more can all effect what the poll watchers see.
#cogdis

And I believe, at least from a friend who lives in GA, that Dominion machines were used.  At least in his district.  #notprovenincourttho

drck1000

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1435 on: January 06, 2021, 12:43:43 PM »
I like how the gaslighters keep sticking to the same tired old talking points even though it does not work any more. Smells like Desperation by Calvin Klein
#easilyhoodwinked

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1436 on: January 06, 2021, 12:47:30 PM »
#cogdis

And I believe, at least from a friend who lives in GA, that Dominion machines were used.  At least in his district.  #notprovenincourttho

John Lovell of Warrior Poet Society post that they are being used.  If that's your friend, tell him to send me a shirt.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1437 on: January 06, 2021, 01:14:04 PM »
Just because someone is watching a paper being fed thru a machine from a few feet away, doesn't mean fraud can't happen.  Sad that some do not realize this.

Combo of illegitimate voters that Project Veritas brought to light , algorthym of the Dominion machine used once again, and much more can all effect what the poll watchers see.

One of the anomalies brought out and PROVEN was that Dominion machines were kicking out ballots at a 68% rate requiring intervention by a tabulator person at another (unobserved) machine. 

The problem described is that ballots mailed to Republican leaning districts had alignment marks that were "off" causing the readers to not "see" that a vote was filled in for (usually) Republican candidates.  The ballots sent to Democrat leaning districts had no such printing problems, and therefore read into the ballot counting machines with few errors.

Once a ballot has a problem being read, an image of the ballot is sent to a tabulator who either lets it go through as Democrat, Republican, no candidate/party selected for that race/ballot,  or rejected as spoiled.

So, Trump votes were being short-circuited while Biden votes were being automatically added.  Without observers at the tabulating machines, the scanners could be observed all day and night without anyone seeing what was really happening to the votes.  This method could have easily been employed for any election.  The people having the ballots printed and the people doing the error corrections have the access needed to pull that off.  Since the printing "problems" are minor, it would be hard to prove intent, even though the problems only exist on ballots in one party's districts.  The tabulators fixing the "errors" are often out of view and working on a few terminals vs. many ballot counting scanners.

This process is another reason why a recount/audit is useless.  A misprinted ballot that needs correcting once, then recounted as an image that's in error will never point to the fraud that occurred.

The proof is out there in the testimonies given multiple times in GA and other states.  It's easy to find.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

drck1000

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1438 on: January 06, 2021, 01:44:59 PM »
John Lovell of Warrior Poet Society post that they are being used.  If that's your friend, tell him to send me a shirt.
Do you view him as credible?

eyeeatingfish

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1439 on: January 06, 2021, 05:27:55 PM »
How much of these voters are legitimate voters.  Too many slip through the cracks type of changes were added to accomodate the "pandemic" situation for "safety".  Yeah right.


Who knows, but at this point any redress has to prove that that there was fraud, not prove that there wasn't fraud.