Hey if yall can post speciation I figure gotta even the field and post both sides.   

Doesnt know the difference between opinions and statistics. Makes total sense now.

Refund needed

Hahaha someone caught on camera a super liberal reporters reaction the  moment when AZ audit announced the 75,000 ballots found with no record of being issued.


Pic = 1K words




https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/must-see-fake-news-hack-stresses-74243-ballot-discrepancy-announced-audit-hearing/

Hey if yall can post speciation I figure gotta even the field and post both sides.   

You keep on posting that speciation [sic].  Must be fun to be the self-appointed "opposing opinion" on EVERYTHING here, yet you can't bother to use English words in a way most people will comprehend. 

Low standards give rise to low expectations. 

#IlliterateCollegeGrad
#NotSarcasm

You keep on posting that speciation [sic].  Must be fun to be the self-appointed "opposing opinion" on EVERYTHING here, yet you can't bother to use English words in a way most people will comprehend. 

Low standards give rise to low expectations. 

#IlliterateCollegeGrad
#NotSarcasm

he/she/it miswrote it!
it's the spellchecker's fault!
not wrong!!!

Sounds like Omni has relatives in AZ.

AZ Election Supervisor Sellers released a statement reacting to audit findings where he just said “no, you’re wrong on all accounts” with no reasoning as to why.



The Arizona Senate would appreciate the County telling them exactly why they’re wrong but they don’t have an answer. This is further impeding this investigation.


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/az-state-sen-kelly-townsend-demands-ag-brnovich-investigate-az-audit-findings-countys-bogus-response/

he/she/it miswrote it!
it's the spellchecker's fault!
not wrong!!!

And typing on a cell phone.

Sounds like Omni has relatives in AZ.

AZ Election Supervisor Sellers released a statement reacting to audit findings where he just said “no, you’re wrong on all accounts” with no reasoning as to why.



The Arizona Senate would appreciate the County telling them exactly why they’re wrong but they don’t have an answer. This is further impeding this investigation.


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/az-state-sen-kelly-townsend-demands-ag-brnovich-investigate-az-audit-findings-countys-bogus-response/

Omni-ism

.

And typing on a cell phone.

And English is not one his stronger subjects!

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Sounds like Omni has relatives in AZ.

AZ Election Supervisor Sellers released a statement reacting to audit findings where he just said “no, you’re wrong on all accounts” with no reasoning as to why.



The Arizona Senate would appreciate the County telling them exactly why they’re wrong but they don’t have an answer. This is further impeding this investigation.


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/az-state-sen-kelly-townsend-demands-ag-brnovich-investigate-az-audit-findings-countys-bogus-response/

The County doesn't have to do the AZ Senate's homework for them.

Maybe the Senate should learn to use Google?!

 

Military Intelligence Proves Stolen Election In Multiple States

https://populist.press/military-intelligence-proves-stolen-election-in-multiple-states/

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Military Intelligence Proves Stolen Election In Multiple States

https://populist.press/military-intelligence-proves-stolen-election-in-multiple-states/

Same officer proves the Sun rose yesterday and every other day prior.

Some things are obvious on their face without a need to analyze the evidence.  When ballots are counted multiple times ON VIDEO after being hidden during the normal counting hours, when ballots in all the swing states magically appeared from parts unknown at 3AM, when a process that allows less than one percent errors suddenly allows 60% of bad ballots to be accepted, when Trump wins all but one bell weather county out of almost 20 and still loses the state -- when results are the opposite of what occurred in the past 40 years without exception -- it's too obvious that the results are being manipulated.

Half the nation is telling the other half that the Emperor is wearing invisible clothes.  The other half can't understand how those people can be so stupid.

So, the audit in AZ, in a hearing for preliminary findings, stated that over 74K mail-in ballots were cast for which there is no record that they were sent out to registered voters.

The "explanation" given by the Maricopa County rep is those were all walk-in ballots cast before election day.  Those ballots are treated like mail-in ballots.

That begs two questions AT LEAST:

(1) Why treat them as mail-in ballots when they obviously are not mail-ins.  They are early WALK-INS.  They should be handled the same as polling place walk-ins on election day -- same voter role and ID requirements as a normal in-person ballot.  Since the numbers show a 74K ballot gap, this is not a case of people using mail-in ballots they received and simply dropping them off during early voting.

(2) Obviously the way in which the early voting ballots are collected and counted isn't allowing anyone to separate them  from other ballots for things like metrics and evaluation of whether walk-in early balloting as implemented is working properly.    Why is that?  Maybe because you can't cheat as easily if you don't jumble up early votes with mail-in votes.  How are they not keeping a count of walk-in ballots cast separate from mail-in?  That's just basic bean counting used to do things like estimating how many ballots to print and ensuring boxes of ballots from "walk-ins" don't "walk off" -- both completed and blank ballots.

There's no reason early voting shouldn't be handled like election walk-in voting.  To treat them as mail-in simply ensures those ballots are as susceptible to fraud and miscounting as the actual mail-in and drop-box ballots.

So, the audit in AZ, in a hearing for preliminary findings, stated that over 74K mail-in ballots were cast for which there is no record that they were sent out to registered voters.

The "explanation" given by the Maricopa County rep is those were all walk-in ballots cast before election day.  Those ballots are treated like mail-in ballots.

That fairy tale doesnt explain why there are no records attached to 74K ballots, walk-ins have to show ID, fill out  paper work and sign an affidavit to get a ballot as  opposed to  a registered voter on the roll who just shows ID and signs by their name. If this is their explanation the should be able to roll in pallets of paperwork to prove it. Unless they are hiding all those docs next to the routers they wont surrender as per court order.

The level of scrutiny for a walk in voter is much higher than registering before hand.

That fairy tale doesnt explain why there are no records attached to 74K ballots, walk-ins have to show ID, fill out  paper work and sign an affidavit to get a ballot as  opposed to  a registered voter on the roll who just shows ID and signs by their name. If this is their explanation the should be able to roll in pallets of paperwork to prove it. Unless they are hiding all those docs next to the routers they wont surrender as per court order.

The level of scrutiny for a walk in voter is much higher than registering before hand.

That's what I was getting at in the rest of my post.  If there are 74K more "mail-in ballots" counted than sent out, then there should be 74K early voting ballots that "explain" that discrepancy.

Where is the documentation for those ballots, and why would the auditors not be able to discern the origin of those ballots themselves?

Sounds like there were 74K ballots injected into the count under cover of "mail-ins".  Since the envelopes for the mail-ins had all been separated from the mail-ins before counting, there's no way to tell afterward which ballots are true mail-ins and which were "stuffed" into the ballot box after the polls closed.

Fishy.

That's what I was getting at in the rest of my post.  If there are 74K more "mail-in ballots" counted than sent out, then there should be 74K early voting ballots that "explain" that discrepancy.

Where is the documentation for those ballots, and why would the auditors not be able to discern the origin of those ballots themselves?

Sounds like there were 74K ballots injected into the count under cover of "mail-ins".  Since the envelopes for the mail-ins had all been separated from the mail-ins before counting, there's no way to tell afterward which ballots are true mail-ins and which were "stuffed" into the ballot box after the polls closed.

Fishy.

It is interesting because Google and the AZ SoS havent bothered to memory hole the AZ election laws for 2019, I actually spent a couple minutes reading them and knowing what we know now, Maricopa basically ignored most of them.
Biggest problem with election laws is there arent really any big penalties for not following them, only place that is changing that is Texas. Youd think there would be some serious jail time for violating the civil rights of thousands if not millions of people.

Wow what a joke. a total fraud.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/exclusive-documents-provided-bogus-georgia-election-audit-completed-november-include-statement-work-dated-last-week/

Audit Documents Were Created Last Week for Georgia Election Audit Completed in November Only After a FOIA Request

the actual audit report by Pro V&V could not be found anywhere.  After an exhaustive search, and in disbelief that the audit report had gone unpublished, we submitted a FOIA request to the state of Georgia for records of the audit. Specifically, our request included the following:

    Under the Georgia Open Records Act § 50.18.70 et seq., I am requesting an opportunity to inspect or obtain copies of public records that detail the results, contract, scope and report of the audit that the Secretary of State contracted or directed Pro V&V to perform on the Dominion Voting equipment and machines after the 2020 general election.
Please include the names of the individuals who physically performed the audit and any scope of work they were and were not permitted or allowed to perform that may be missing from the report, and the reason. “


Not only was the memo created last Friday, but It was created last Friday by Pro V&V’s owner, Jack Cobb.
This revelation leaves little possibility for any plausible explanation other than the Georgia Secretary of State’s office contacted Pro V&V who created the memo to provide in response to our FOIA request.

Not only was the audit performed by an uncertified vendor at the time, but the report also states that both four and six counties were selected for review in their audit. The firm looked at no ballots.