Election Fraud Evidence Thread (Read 529471 times)

Kuleana

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #760 on: December 03, 2020, 02:32:33 PM »
Don't underestimate the pakeness of pake's.
That's why they are poised to be the most dominant nation, in this century, and will forever be the oldest surviving human civilization, on this planet.

drck1000

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #761 on: December 03, 2020, 02:35:19 PM »
That's why they are poised to be the most dominant nation, in this century, and will forever be the oldest surviving human civilization, on this planet.
Qing or Manchu? 

I vote for Egyptians. . .

But I digress. . .  ;D

Anyways  :stopjack:

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #762 on: December 03, 2020, 02:52:11 PM »
This is what REAL voter suppression looks like ...

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

ren

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #763 on: December 03, 2020, 03:17:56 PM »
testimony


I'm so disgusted. I'm tired.
Deeds Not Words

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #764 on: December 03, 2020, 03:34:36 PM »
testimony

I'm so disgusted. I'm tired.

For the committee member that complained about "These people are not sworn in," and are lying, and "I only see one Detroiter in the group..."

First, every single one of them signed affidavits of their testimony under penalty of perjury.

Second, why did she not insist on swearing in the witnesses BEFORE giving testimony?

And third, the whole city of Detroit is corrupt.  It appears to take non-Detroiters to blow the whistle on them.  Duh!!

I'm sure she had ample opportunity to submit her own list of "Detroiters" to testify, but then they would all be subject to perjury laws, too.  Any takers, you think?

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

ren

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #765 on: December 03, 2020, 04:04:03 PM »
Deeds Not Words

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #766 on: December 03, 2020, 04:52:37 PM »
...

From an IT perspective, there are lots of real points touched on in that video that should have been addressed for real long ago.

The States run their own elections.  Why would the Feds provide funding for those elections?  The Feds f*uck up everything they try to control, and funding gives them a hook into controlling state elections.  So ... no!
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #767 on: December 03, 2020, 07:58:26 PM »
If Kemp is taking action, after his hiding in his basement for a month, you know something is up (let's see if he actually follows up or if he's just flapping his lips before the President arrives on Saturday)... but, I'm sure the video with the 4 suitcases of ballots being opened when there are no observers present is all above board... right?

Governor Kemp Calls on Secretary of State Raffensperger to Call for a “Signature Audit” in the State

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/breaking-governor-kemp-calls-secretary-state-raffensperger-call-signature-audit-state/

Then earlier today video was released of Democrat operatives removing GOP observers on election night and then pulling out SUITCASES FULL OF BALLOTS to steal the Georgia election from Donald Trump!

Tonight crooked Governor Brian Kemp from Georgia told Laura Ingraham he is calling on his derelict Secretary of State to call for a “Signature audit” of the votes.

He was willing to allow the fraud to slide until today’s video.

Kemp is either caught up in this scandal or he is extremely weak.

Video as embedded in tweet: https://twitter.com/i/status/1334569329334083586

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #768 on: December 04, 2020, 07:32:19 AM »
Submitted to the court... I hear that in Nevada there's a higher chance (than the other swing states) of getting a local judge who might be fair in examining the evidence...

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #769 on: December 04, 2020, 07:38:06 AM »
Video testimony of numerous sworn affidavit-signing eyewitnesses to vote tabulation irregularities or outright fraud, the full PA and AZ hearings, and President Trump's speech of two days ago. All in one convenient location.

https://fraudscrookscriminals.com/2020/12/03/

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #770 on: December 04, 2020, 08:00:51 AM »
Just some right wing news guy reporting a likely unsubstantiated Russian disinformation counterintelligence psy op... but... maybe not. Note that a Democrat claimed "that's already been debunked!" even though the evidence had been made available at 11 PM the night before and it was only noon of the next day. I guess they spew the talking points regardless of the facts. Maybe she meant "Even someone before me has claimed that evidence has been debunked".

Trump Team Has Dominion Machine from Small Georgia County – Shows Votes Flipped from Trump to Biden

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/breaking-huge-trump-team-dominion-machine-small-georgia-county-shows-votes-flipped-trump-biden/

The Trump team has obtained a Dominion voting machine in Georgia.  The machine shows votes were moved from President Trump to Joe Biden.  BOOM.

Yesterday on the War Room it was reported that the Trump team has obtained a Dominion voting machine in Georgia:

At the 52:30 mark in the video below, John Fredericks shares the news on the War Room with Steve Bannon:

According to Fredericks, there were 37 votes that flipped in this small Georgia County on the machine.  However, this represents only .26% of the Georgia ballots.  When extrapolating to the entire state, this equals more than 14,000 votes and Georgia was stolen by only 10,000 votes by Biden.

Video embedded in tweet. Start at 52:30

https://t.co/NFCygALvGk?amp=1

or here, time stamped:

https://youtu.be/HwL8EfOt2Ks?t=3149

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #771 on: December 04, 2020, 09:59:04 AM »
Okay, I admit this is peripheral evidence of fraud/irregularities in the Presidential election, but still... where there's smoke...

138,000 Kids Suddenly Added To Santa's Nice List In Middle Of Night

December 4th, 2020



NORTH POLE—Santa Claus's nice list is said to be run on trustworthy software, safe and secure on an unhackable server under his workshop.

But some are questioning the legitimacy of the nice list after the tally suddenly spiked in the middle of the night, adding over 138,000 kids to the good side of the list.

After sorting kids according to their niceness or naughtiness for hours, Santa had abruptly stopped counting and gone to bed, saying he was tired and taking a break for the night, even though he is magical and does not need to sleep.

A team of unsupervised elves reportedly continued the counting against North Pole guidelines, and around 3 a.m. there was a sudden dump of over 138,000 kids put on the nice list. The software also switched kids over from the naughty to the nice list at random.

Big Tech companies quickly fact-checked the claim, assuring parents and children that the sudden jump of hundreds of thousands of kids added to the nice list is a normal part of kid sorting and that Santa's methods are trustworthy and reliable.

GlockNewb

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #772 on: December 04, 2020, 10:17:28 AM »
Oh Georgia, Georgia...

"Fast is slow, slow is smooth, smooth is fast."

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #773 on: December 04, 2020, 11:05:43 AM »
Oh Georgia, Georgia...

One female Democrat Representative in the hearing tried to say the Secretary of State had already debunked the story in the video.  Some of the SOS people actually testified to the opposite (nobody was running ballots without supervision at State Farm Center).

None of those people had seen the video, since it was just provided to the Republican team the night before. 

Or, had they?

It took over a month for the video to be made available to the people looking for evidence of fraud.  No one in government ever made that footage available to the public.  It took a private lawyer to present the evidence to the Georgia lawmakers.

Accusations of the late night, unobserved, unmonitored counting session of ballots hidden under a table came out soon after the election.  This was not a new "thing".  My sinister mind tells me the SOS had the video yet released a "debunked" statement 180 degrees from what the video shows to deny the truth. 

Now that the bombshell video is public, and the Georgia SOS testifiers could not have possibly debunked the story told on the video THAT NONE OF THOSE PEOPLE COULD HAVE POSSIBLY WATCHED unless they kept quiet about seeing it, it "feels" like the lawmakers are seriously taking a look at what they can do at this stage in terms of the electors.

The Republicans in the hearing said they haven't received calls from their constituents on any other issue like they have on this election.  The vast majority of those contacting representatives have no confidence that the election was honest and they feel the results can't be trusted.

The Democrat woman I mentioned thinks there was no reason for having that hearing at all .... for any reason .... move along.   :wacko:

I also feel that the only reason the video survived a Democrat "Oopsie!  My bad!" Bleach Bit accident is that the counting occurred in State Farm Stadium, and the government has no legal or physical access to the security areas where the video recordings are kept.  Good thing for the country, no one in the counting room knew what a camera looks like.   :rofl:
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #774 on: December 04, 2020, 11:30:25 AM »
Updates for some of the lawsuits progressing in some states. I really like this guy. I think he is being forthcoming with the information we are waiting to hear about. Along with his narrative of what it all means. Based on the judges rulings, there looks like there is a chance Trump can still win the election. But certain cards have to fall in place before that happens.

It’s HAPPENING! Trumps legal team and the other legal teams are closing in on the Democrats:

SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #775 on: December 04, 2020, 11:48:04 AM »
My friend on FB posted the vid. He's a gun owner also.  FB had a "fact check" warning that basically stated no context for the vid. It's not possible to see clearly that those are ballots.  Which what I was saying  a some post ago would be the excuse.

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #776 on: December 04, 2020, 12:02:10 PM »
My friend on FB posted the vid. He's a gun owner also.  FB had a "fact check" warning that basically stated no context for the vid. It's not possible to see clearly that those are ballots.  Which what I was saying  a some post ago would be the excuse.
Yep. They (state officials) checked it all out. Nothing to see here. It's all legit. Those are the normal ballot transportation containers, hidden stored in the normal place beneath a table. Well, except for saying they were closing due to a water leak that never happened and removing all the reporters and observers. Oh, wait, that never happened either. Everything you know is wrong.


Raffensperger Responds To Video — ‘Those were not suitcases, and it wasn’t fraud’…

Griff Jenkins [Faux News reporter], after speaking with Georgia officials, said on Friday morning that reports claiming the video showed unsupervised voter fraud were “simply not true.”

“I just got off the phone with a senior source in the Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office, who says they had a designated observer at that spot all night, the entire time, and they’ve seen this video, they’re familiar with the claims, and they said that they’re simply not true,” Jenkins said in a report on Friday morning. “The suggestion that Georgia vote counters were sent home and ballots were brought in in suitcases, also not true.”

“What appears is reported as suitcases are actually the normal containers that ballots are put in,” he continued. “That is not unusual, they say, for them.”

“If you look at the videotape, the work you see is the work you would expect, which is you take the sealed suitcase looking things in, you place the ballots on the scanner in manageable batches and you scan them,” Sterling said.

Frances Watson, the chief investigator for the Georgia secretary of state office, confirmed that the containers seen in the video weren’t suitcases, but rather the normal bins used for the ballot counting process.

“There wasn’t a bin that had ballots in it under that table. It was an empty bin and the ballots from it were actually out on the table when the media were still there, and then it was placed back into the box when the media were still there and placed next to the table.”

Watson added that the media were never told to leave as the claims indicate, but rather that the location “was still open for them or the public to come back in to view at whatever time they wanted to, as long as [election workers] were still working.” She said that the ballots that had already been opened in front of the observers were the only ones scanned after the media and other observers left.

The office of Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, has already looked into the claims, and found nothing, WSB, the ABC affiliate in Atlanta reported.  ‘The 90 second video of election workers at State Farm arena, purporting to show fraud was watched in its entirety (hours) by @GaSecofState investigators. Shows normal ballot processing. Here is the fact check on it,’ he tweeted.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #777 on: December 04, 2020, 12:32:03 PM »
"90 Second video?"  LOL!  I guess they are counting on the press to parrot these lies, and the public to be too disinterested to watch the video for themselves.

The video shown in the hearing spanned over 2 hours of elapsed time where it can be seen that the place was effectively shutdown until after the observers were gone.  Only then did the Pelican cases come out from under the table, where no other ballots had been taken and processed the entire day.  The table was put in place at 08:22 AM.  The team didn't have time to watch the entire recording between then and 10:30 PM to see when the cases were placed under the table, but that's next on their to-do list. 

Why have tablecloths on some tables and not others?  When counting money, ballots, or anything of value, businesses do not put anything on the tables that might obscure them from observation.  Common sense.  The fewer places people can hide what they are doing, the lower the risk that someone will try to do just that.

Who are we supposed to believe .... you, or my lying eyes?   :wacko:

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #778 on: December 04, 2020, 12:38:36 PM »
Reminds me of  a friend who found another girls underwear in her bf's room.  He denied knowing how it got there.  Maybe it got mixed up in the laundry and a panty was added in his 3 pack of underwear by mistake at the factory.  Cause he does wash them before using, so didn't notice the extra panty inside the package when dumping the entire package into his laundry basket.  Or maybe was from an ex gf long time ago and didn't find it until now.  Could be a friend playing a joke on him and left it behind knowing his gf would find it.

She broke up with him.

See how anything can be covered up by an explanation that sounds reasonable.

 I remember being at a hearing to testify and the case before me had a guy busted for having meth on him at a park.  The defense atty asked the cop how he tested the contents of the pipe (scrapings). Cop said he used a paperclip to scrape the residue off the pipe.  Defense atty then asked where he got the paper clip from and if it was in a sterile container prior to him taking 1 and if he kept it in a sterile container in his car.  Cop said he got it from the box at another cops desk.  For all we know, the guy packing the paper clips at the plant could have been smoking meth at the time, so there was a transfer.  The judge didn't believe the defense atty.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #779 on: December 04, 2020, 01:41:29 PM »
Reminds me of  a friend who found another girls underwear in her bf's room.  He denied knowing how it got there.  Maybe it got mixed up in the laundry and a panty was added in his 3 pack of underwear by mistake at the factory.  Cause he does wash them before using, so didn't notice the extra panty inside the package when dumping the entire package into his laundry basket.  Or maybe was from an ex gf long time ago and didn't find it until now.  Could be a friend playing a joke on him and left it behind knowing his gf would find it.

She broke up with him.

See how anything can be covered up by an explanation that sounds reasonable.

 I remember being at a hearing to testify and the case before me had a guy busted for having meth on him at a park.  The defense atty asked the cop how he tested the contents of the pipe (scrapings). Cop said he used a paperclip to scrape the residue off the pipe.  Defense atty then asked where he got the paper clip from and if it was in a sterile container prior to him taking 1 and if he kept it in a sterile container in his car.  Cop said he got it from the box at another cops desk.  For all we know, the guy packing the paper clips at the plant could have been smoking meth at the time, so there was a transfer.  The judge didn't believe the defense atty.

"Reasonable man" standard.  No matter how many lies they come up with to explain away the evidence, it's hard to argue with the facts as testified to by many, many witnesses.  The lady presenting the video said reporters told her someone was still counting after everyone left, and she rushed down there just as everyone was almost gone.  She spoke to one of the workers who confirmed they had been counting ballots.  No Chinese Menus were involved.   :rofl:  Why would she return if they left of their own accord and not that they were told to leave?

There are enough reporters and observers to testify to what they were told when they left that day.  Do these state officials really think no one will contradict their lies?
« Last Edit: December 04, 2020, 02:43:44 PM by Flapp_Jackson »
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw