I believe so far no trump lawsuits have been won,  most have been dismissed or dropped.  With such "evidence" everywhere I wonder why....what possible logical reasoning could there be? 

Anyone have any evidence of anything progressing in court?

Hey Punaperson, thanks for posting all of this evidence. It’s starting to flow out like water out of a spigot. I see GA and PA are in disarray. And AZ and NV are not far behind. Still wanting to see more out of MI and WI but I’ll wait. I’m patient. In the meantime I try and read everything you post but there is so much of it that I can’t take it all in and keep track of it all. So thanks for keeping up and keeping track of everything. And please correct me if I’m wrong about something. I assume I’ll get some facts wrong again.

And he still doesn’t get it...

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

As they say, there's no evidence .... of a properly run election!

Georgia County Can’t Find Chain of Custody Records for Absentee Ballots...

or if they even exist!!

https://gellerreport.com/2020/12/georgia-county-cant-find-chain-of-custody-records-for-absentee-ballots-exist.html/

The regular MSM suspects are eerily quiet.  Whenever Biden farts, they report on the lovely fragrance.  But, when more evidence that the election was shady comes out -- *crickets*.

Without a chain of custody form, which is required by law, there's no way to tell who handled the ballots nor whether the seal numbers on the ballot boxes even match the one's used and removed.

In all my days of dealing with numbered tags and seals -- mostly in the military -- whenever something is sealed (like classified material being transported), the seal number is recorded on a transfer record.  The next person in the chain visually inspects the seal to make sure it's undamaged then signs the next line on the form/record as receiving the container with the proper seal -- intact with the correct number. 

If the seal is removed to inspect and/or inventory the contents, the recipient and courier both record that the seal was removed, the broken seal is retained in a clear plastic bag that's kept with the form (keeping it inside the container would be stupid), and the new seal number is recorded on the form when the container is resealed.   The custody form is managed separate and apart from the container, so if the container is tampered with or missing, the chain of custody record is not also changed or missing.

Basically, there is a procedure.  If the procedure is ignored or bypassed, the chain of custody cannot be verified.  Most times, the last person to have verifiable custody is hung out to dry if they failed to ensure the chain remained unbroken.

There's no way to recreate the form, as anyone who did anything wrong would be as likely to lie about their recollection. 

Either they find the actual form, or they decertify Dekalb County.   No other options IMHO.

And he still doesn’t get it...

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

 

Shhhhhhhh!!! Don’t tell him that! I want him to keep thinking that keeping score is important! It makes him feel better when he thinks he won!!! 

Shhhhhhhh!!! Don’t tell him that! I want him to keep thinking that keeping score is important! It makes him feel better when he thinks he won!!! 

He already believes he wins at everything.  Even when he bets, but then retracts.  He wins even then. . .

And he still doesn’t get it...

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

I was just thinking, what will happen when everyone stops responding to him?
Will he just make a new account? Keep talking to himself thinking he's winning?  Mac & Drck will keep him entertained?

I was just thinking, what will happen when everyone stops responding to him?
Will he just make a new account? Keep talking to himself thinking he's winning?  Mac & Drck will keep him entertained?

Haha, guilty.  I've been mostly ignoring him.  Well, trying to. 

I was just thinking, what will happen when everyone stops responding to him?
Will he just make a new account? Keep talking to himself thinking he's winning?  Mac & Drck will keep him entertained?

You may be right. He’s just looking for attention. 

I believe so far no trump lawsuits have been won,  most have been dismissed or dropped.  With such "evidence" everywhere I wonder why....what possible logical reasoning could there be? 

Anyone have any evidence of anything progressing in court?

Not us. We're conspiracy theorists, remember!

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Good synopsis of PA election fraud.

Yes, FRAUD!

OAN's Chanel Rion on massive Georgia voting fraud!
Dominion 'Vote Flip': Fact vs Fiction in Ware County, GA

I was just thinking, what will happen when everyone stops responding to him?
Will he just make a new account? Keep talking to himself thinking he's winning?  Mac & Drck will keep him entertained?

I'm not flapp I don't make new accounts.  I will post regardless I am here to try bring some balance to the lurkers and the forum in general.  Not all 2a supporters are conservatives clones.  If I have to be the independent voice so be it. 

You may be right. He’s just looking for attention. 

Y'all taking about that little pissant?

Or one of the other blocked liberals?

Judges are in on it. How many are barry appointees?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I believe so far no trump lawsuits have been won,  most have been dismissed or dropped.  With such "evidence" everywhere I wonder why....what possible logical reasoning could there be? 

Anyone have any evidence of anything progressing in court?

Was that your great great great great grandfather who quipped, "I believe so far no Dred Scott lawsuits have been won,  most have been dismissed or dropped.  With such "evidence" everywhere I wonder why....what possible logical reasoning could there be?  Anyone have any evidence of anything progressing in court?"

Texas files election lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court…

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/breaking-texas-files-election-lawsuit-against-georgia-michigan-pennsylvania-and-wisconsin-at-supreme-court/

The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.

Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.

Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors.

“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.”

“This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.”

Sidney Powell — ‘We should have at least 3 states before the Supreme Court by the end of the week’…

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/sidney-powell-we-should-have-at-least-3-states-before-the-supreme-court-by-the-end-of-the-week/

Sidney Powell with Greg Kelly earlier tonight

 

Sidney discusses next steps after a judge dismissed the Kraken case earlier today — ‘There should be at least 3 states before the Supreme Court with enough electoral votes to change the outcome before the end of the week.’

Finally seeing some traction towards the end goal. I am glad to see Texas stepping up and Sidney Powell getting to SCOTUS is a good thing. Slowly grinding our way to the top.