Senator Ted Cruz agreed to argue the election tampering case against PA if SCOTUS takes the case. I think he is articulate enough to argue a case in front of SCOTUS. I’m not sure if he has any experience in front of SCOTUS however. Maybe someone from the ACLJ will assist him?

Judges are in on it. How many are barry appointees?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Some but there are also Bush and even Trumps own appointments that voted against or to dismiss...

Senator Ted Cruz agreed to argue the election tampering case against PA if SCOTUS takes the case. I think he is articulate enough to argue a case in front of SCOTUS. I’m not sure if he has any experience in front of SCOTUS however. Maybe someone from the ACLJ will assist him?

Cruz also clerked for Chief Justice William Rehnquist. The article below has the oral arguments for each of the cases he argued at SCOTUS.

In Nine Trips to Supreme Court, Ted Cruz Saw Mixed Results

https://www.texastribune.org/2016/01/24/ted-cruz-supreme-court-cases/

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz belongs to an elite club of lawyers who have repeatedly argued before the U.S. Supreme Court. A closer look at the nine times the Texan argued before the justices shows wins and losses as he challenged legal limits.

Before he was a U.S. senator or a candidate for president, Ted Cruz argued before the U.S. Supreme Court nine times, putting the Texas Republican in an exclusive club.

“Most lawyers in America will never argue in front of the Supreme Court, much less do it nine times,” said Paul Collins, director of legal studies at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

For all but one of his nine cases before the nation’s highest court, Cruz represented the state of Texas as its solicitor general. It was a role that allowed him to challenge the legal limits of hot-button issues such as the Voting Rights Act and states’ rights.

Over nine trips to the Supreme Court, Cruz clearly lost four cases and won two. The other three rulings were less clear-cut.

Senator Ted Cruz agreed to argue the election tampering case against PA if SCOTUS takes the case. I think he is articulate enough to argue a case in front of SCOTUS. I’m not sure if he has any experience in front of SCOTUS however. Maybe someone from the ACLJ will assist him?

The plaintiffs argue that the state does not have grounds to allow non-absentee vote-by-mail without a constitutional amendment. Nearly 30 Republican members of the state legislature have signed a document in amicus with Kelly and Parnell's case.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ted-cruz-pennsylvania-election-case-supreme-court

That is what I noted from the subject being brought up numerous times starting the day after the election, but only now seems to be getting coverage by the "larger" media outlets.  It was pretty much blackout on the topic other than going through not as main stream sources.  I am NOT saying that automatically state credibility, just it doesn't take a Jenius to think "this is too important an issue to not be in the national spotlight".  Yet, the stupid story of college admissions scandals and two has beens going to jail for it is front and center.  Who gives a shit about those has beens? 

To me, that was the point of the rush for TV and sports to return.  To get the attention off of more significant issues.  Americans, and people in general love distractions and there are many who thrive on giving that to us.  I'm not all "everything is a false" flag tinfoil conspiracist, but. . .

Republicans Who Think Election Recount Is Still Ongoing Found Deep In Jungle
December 8th, 2020



U.S.—With the 2020 election certified in all the contentious states, most weak-willed Republican squishes have resigned themselves to the fact that Joe Biden has successfully stolen the election and that it’s time to focus on the Georgia runoff races and holding the Senate. Still, there are some remote areas of the country that word of surrender has not reached. In these American jungles, Trump loyalists continue their guerrilla campaign, thinking that a recount is still ongoing and that the election results are still in doubt.

“We’ve just got to keep our eyes open for illegal ballots,” said MAGA hat-wearing patriot Jon Marsh, hiding deep in the bushes, his only contact with the outside world being Charlie Kirk’s newsletter. “Any day now, Georgia is going to get put into Trump’s column. And then Pennsylvania. And then I guess either Arizona or Michigan. Maybe both. Landslide!”

Some Republican emissaries have been sent to try to reach these holdouts. Bill Kristol ventured deep into one jungle to whine to them that it was over and that they needed to give up and embrace Biden. He was later found wedgied with a note taped to his shirt that said, “As soon as Sidney Powell presents all her evidence, you’ll look like a fool!”

It’s unclear if any message of the election’s end will ever be able to reach these Republicans, especially with their ringleader, President Trump, hiding out in the jungle with them. He hasn’t been seen in some time, though his last tweet read, “It’s all in the bag. Definitely got this. Holding a rally soon. And make sure to donate!”

Michigan House Chairman Tells Dominion CEO to Appear or Be Subpoenaed

https://www.theepochtimes.com/michigan-house-chairman-tells-dominion-ceo-to-appear-or-be-subpoenaed_3609633.html?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-08-3

A Michigan lawmaker leading the investigation into the 2020 election threatened Dominion Voting Systems CEO with a subpoena if he doesn’t appear before his committee voluntarily.

State Rep. Matt Hall, a Republican who chairs the Michigan House Oversight Committee, said in a Dec. 7 letter obtained by The Epoch Times that he sent a missive last month asking Dominion CEO John Poulos to testify before the committee.

“I have not received an answer to my request. I am writing again to request your appearance before the House Oversight Committee so that we can further investigate Dominion’s role in the election,” Hall wrote to Poulos in the new letter.

The representative said there have been a number of claims and accusations regarding Dominion’s software and the results of the election and that Poulos could help lawmakers and voters better understand the election software.

If Poulos cannot make it in person, testimony via Zoom would serve.

“If Dominion chooses to ignore this second request to come before the committee I am prepared to seek legislative subpoena power to compel your appearance before the House Oversight Committee,” Hall wrote. “I am hopeful that it would not come to this.”

Dominion didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Michigan House Chairman Tells Dominion CEO to Appear or Be Subpoenaed

https://www.theepochtimes.com/michigan-house-chairman-tells-dominion-ceo-to-appear-or-be-subpoenaed_3609633.html?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-08-3

A Michigan lawmaker leading the investigation into the 2020 election threatened Dominion Voting Systems CEO with a subpoena if he doesn’t appear before his committee voluntarily.

State Rep. Matt Hall, a Republican who chairs the Michigan House Oversight Committee, said in a Dec. 7 letter obtained by The Epoch Times that he sent a missive last month asking Dominion CEO John Poulos to testify before the committee.

“I have not received an answer to my request. I am writing again to request your appearance before the House Oversight Committee so that we can further investigate Dominion’s role in the election,” Hall wrote to Poulos in the new letter.

The representative said there have been a number of claims and accusations regarding Dominion’s software and the results of the election and that Poulos could help lawmakers and voters better understand the election software.

If Poulos cannot make it in person, testimony via Zoom would serve.

“If Dominion chooses to ignore this second request to come before the committee I am prepared to seek legislative subpoena power to compel your appearance before the House Oversight Committee,” Hall wrote. “I am hopeful that it would not come to this.”

Dominion didn’t respond to a request for comment.

You know the Dems lost the election when they start leaving the country.

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

You know the Dems lost the election when they start leaving the country.

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

You mean the ones that threatened to leave in 2016-2017?  Whoopie et al?

Bye Felcia

There are some extant records and reports that some of these drop box ballots were returned to the tabulation centers as much as 24 hours after (supposedly) being picked up. The law requires that they be immediately taken to the vote tabulation center. Also, many of the mandated video security systems were solar powered with no battery storage system, so there is no video of near/after dark deposits. The boxes and security systems in the contested swing state counties and cities were largely funded by Zuckerberg. Nothing to see here.

Here is Fulton county giving the finger to Trump and all citizens who want all legal votes to count, and no illegal votes to count.

Lousiana joining Texas. Florida next?

Y'all taking about that little pissant?

Or one of the other blocked liberals?

The Pissant.

Texas files election lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court…

https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/breaking-texas-files-election-lawsuit-against-georgia-michigan-pennsylvania-and-wisconsin-at-supreme-court/

The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.

Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.

Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors.

“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.”

“This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.”

I think this is the case that will determine the election. I have studied the other cases and this is a constitution violation of states rights case that has been taken directly to the SCOTUS. I hope they decide to take it.

Lousiana joining Texas. Florida next?

While this is good news, the SCOTUS still has to accept the case. But more states that pile on the better the chances that they will. Let’s face it, those 4 states elections violated the constitution. Which in essence changed the outcome of the election. This is not about fraud. This is about the 4 states violating the 14th amendment and the equal protections clause and the rights of the other states and the people of those states. This needs to be decided. This could be the biggest SCOTUS case in our history.

This is a SCOTUS case that they should take.

You mean the ones that threatened to leave in 2016-2017?  Whoopie et al?

Bye Felcia

Sean Hannity offer to pay for it all, plane, champagne, caviar, under one condition. You don't come back at all, good riddance.

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

SCOTUS rejected a PA case by Mike Kelly about mail in ballots being unconstitutional.  Nothing about fraud.

Congressional inaugural committee votes against acknowledging Biden as the president elect. At least the Republicans are standing up against the Democrats here even tho this vote is mostly symbolic its meaningful in that they are standing up for us. And I sincerely appreciate it.

SCOTUS rejected a PA case by Mike Kelly about mail in ballots being unconstitutional.  Nothing about fraud.

focus

das old news. . .

Process per Constitution

Fraud, prob later.  Plenty small fish.  Need beeg feesh.

 

SCOTUS rejected a PA case by Mike Kelly about mail in ballots being unconstitutional.  Nothing about fraud.

Hopefully the Texas case, which apparently has been placed on the docket (accepted for consideration), will get some traction since it has a different tack than the Kelly/Parnell suit.

Just for fun, if you want to waste a minute, you can send an email to the Hawaii AG asking them to join the Texas lawsuit. They will never do that, of course, because they only join lawsuits attempting to further infringe on your rights to keep and bear arms. But just so they know we're out here. Or something.

To use the email form on the AG website:

https://ag.hawaii.gov/contact-us/email-the-department-of-ag/

I'd think one simple sentence would be sufficient, but please go wild if inclined...

Please join the Texas lawsuit submitted to SCOTUS re the unconstitutional changes to voting rights in various states.

focus

das old news. . .

Process per Constitution

Fraud, prob later.  Plenty small fish.  Need beeg feesh.

 

You should know by now we're a bunch of ADHD rabbits running around!

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

focus

das old news. . .

Process per Constitution

Fraud, prob later.  Plenty small fish.  Need beeg feesh.

 

https://www.npr.org/2020/12/08/944230517/supreme-court-rejects-gop-bid-to-reverse-pennsylvania-election-results?utm_campaign=politics&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_term=nprnews&fbclid=IwAR0lNtxZiKq60gQWdsomVoJkZPfiQnZhlpKKOQ9pIlntSft8zJ8_TJZiDfs

dated 12/8.