The entire PA election was fraudulent.  They passed Act 77 in Oct 2019, long before COVID-19 could have been used as an excuse for "no excuse absentee balloting."

If you voted in the 2018 midterm, and your absentee ballot had:

no signature,
a mismatched signature,
a smudged signature,
no postmark date, 
an invalid date,
a date after the election date,
no address,
an invalid address,
an address other than a residence,
no birthdate,
an incomplete birthdate,
an invalid birthdate,
a birthdate that doesn't match the registration,
etc.,
etc.,
etc....

then the ballot was deemed illegal.  To count such a ballot was FRAUD.

In 2020, all of the above "problems" were ignored.  Therefore, any ballots that contained one or more of these issues and were counted anyway are fraudulent.

PA's lawmakers and state supreme court creating unconstitutional rules doesn't magically make the fraudulent ballots valid now.

Since there's no way to go back and look at which ballots had issues with any degree of accuracy, all mail-in ballots are now suspected to be fraudulent.

These lawmakers KNEW they were acting unconstitutionally passing these last minute rule changes.  How could they not?  They tried unsuccessfully to change the state constitution to allow full mail-in voting before trying to side-step the constitution via Act 77. 

I believe PA may be the state that also placed a Constitutional Amendment measure on the 2020 ballot to allow mail-in voting.  Imagine a state's leaders having the gaul to use mail-in voting to authorize mail-in voting.   

https://www.npr.org/2020/12/08/944230517/supreme-court-rejects-gop-bid-to-reverse-pennsylvania-election-results?utm_campaign=politics&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_term=nprnews&fbclid=IwAR0lNtxZiKq60gQWdsomVoJkZPfiQnZhlpKKOQ9pIlntSft8zJ8_TJZiDfs

dated 12/8.

Distraction recycling old news. Distraction works on simple minds...

Hehehe

 

SCOTUS rejected a PA case by Mike Kelly about mail in ballots being unconstitutional.  Nothing about fraud.

I’m no legal scholar by any means. But I think most of these lawsuits were doomed to fail before they even brought them. I could be wrong but I think the wrong person or entity brought this lawsuit. That is how a lot of these lawsuits are failing because the state legislatures should be taking control over the election process and the results but especially how the elections were handled. And so far they are not. A single person or entity does not have the standing to convince SCOTUS to force a special session in these states. But the lawsuit by Texas is the correct entity because they have the standing. And they are arguing constitutional violations not fraud. Even tho the fraud portion is the result of the states not following their own election laws per the constitution. The states need to call a special session per the constitution and resolve all the conflicts and apparently they have not done so, so far. The idea behind the Texas lawsuit is to force the state legislatures to call a special session as ordered by SCOTUS to deal with the election chaos and force them to deal with the Dominion vote flipping fraud and the mail in ballot fraud and to seat their electors as stated by the constitution. Once they are forced to do this you will see that trump won those states hands down and the electoral college electors will be chosen and seated by the state legislatures. However, Biden is going to challenge that and bring in the electors that the Secretaries of State chose (which is against the constitution) so we will have a challenged election. It will then go back to SCOTUS and they will either determine that the electors as chosen by the state legislatures (per the constitution) are the valid electors or they will send the matter to congress where they will vote for president and Vice President.

That is how I see this happening assuming the SCOTUS takes the Texas case. Someone correct me if I’m wrong.

I’m no legal scholar by any means. But I think most of these lawsuits were doomed to fail before they even brought them. I could be wrong but I think the wrong person or entity brought this lawsuit. That is how a lot of these lawsuits are failing because the state legislatures should be taking control over the election process and the results but especially how the elections were handled. And so far they are not. A single person or entity does not have the standing to convince SCOTUS to force a special session in these states. But the lawsuit by Texas is the correct entity because they have the standing. And they are arguing constitutional violations not fraud. Even tho the fraud portion is the result of the states not following their own election laws per the constitution. The states need to call a special session per the constitution and resolve all the conflicts and apparently they have not done so, so far. The idea behind the Texas lawsuit is to force the state legislatures to call a special session as ordered by SCOTUS to deal with the election chaos and force them to deal with the Dominion vote flipping fraud and the mail in ballot fraud and to seat their electors as stated by the constitution. Once they are forced to do this you will see that trump won those states hands down and the electoral college electors will be chosen and seated by the state legislatures. However, Biden is going to challenge that and bring in the electors that the Secretaries of State chose (which is against the constitution) so we will have a challenged election. It will then go back to SCOTUS and they will either determine that the electors as chosen by the state legislatures (per the constitution) are the valid electors or they will send the matter to congress where they will vote for president and Vice President.

That is how I see this happening assuming the SCOTUS takes the Texas case. Someone correct me if I’m wrong.

Nope, laid the smack down. I smell what your cooking!

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Distraction recycling old news. Distraction works on simple minds...

Hehehe

 

My friend who did send me the link has TDS.

Here's the Texas SCOTUS filing, including the 150 page Appendix of affidavits.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163048/20201208132827887_TX-v-State-ExpedMot%202020-12-07%20FINAL.pdf

Here's the Texas SCOTUS filing, including the 150 page Appendix of affidavits.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163048/20201208132827887_TX-v-State-ExpedMot%202020-12-07%20FINAL.pdf

I didn’t read the 150 pages of affidavits. But I did read the 20 page complaint. Pretty powerful stuff. Well laid out and to the point. I highly doubt that Ken Paxton would submit this complaint without vetting all the sworn affidavits. I’m no constitutional scholar but per my limited understanding of all the constitutional laws referenced in the complaint I think this case is quite strong. And with the other states joining in I think they all agree.

Hopefully the Texas case, which apparently has been placed on the docket (accepted for consideration), will get some traction since it has a different tack than the Kelly/Parnell suit.

Just for fun, if you want to waste a minute, you can send an email to the Hawaii AG asking them to join the Texas lawsuit. They will never do that, of course, because they only join lawsuits attempting to further infringe on your rights to keep and bear arms. But just so they know we're out here. Or something.

To use the email form on the AG website:

https://ag.hawaii.gov/contact-us/email-the-department-of-ag/

I'd think one simple sentence would be sufficient, but please go wild if inclined...

Please join the Texas lawsuit submitted to SCOTUS re the unconstitutional changes to voting rights in various states.

HAHA! They got back to me within the hour. I'm guessing the office was laughing out loud, or at least seriously snickering as they composed their response:

Mr. [PunaPerson],

Thank you for your email.  We will review it and take action as deemed prudent or necessary.

Thank you,

Department of the Attorney General

Reports of 7 states now joining Texas.

Reports of 7 states now joining Texas.

https://2ahawaii.com/index.php?topic=38726.msg353597#msg353597

focus

 

https://2ahawaii.com/index.php?topic=38726.msg353597#msg353597

focus

 

Multi-tasking. My bad

Multi-tasking. My bad

You are acquiring bad habits from an idiot troll!! 

You are acquiring bad habits from an idiot troll!! 

Was surfing while I was on a telcon and someone was droning on, and on, and on. . .

Was surfing while I was on a telcon and someone was droning on, and on, and on. . .

Only Millennials can multitask you know...

Was surfing while I was on a telcon and someone was droning on, and on, and on. . .

were you wearing skinny jeans?

Clarification re the Kelly/Parnell PA case at SCOTUS:

were you wearing skinny jeans?

I'm not skinny, at all.  So, uh, no. . .

 

Only Millennials can multitask you know...

Actually women but they'll talk to you from another room with radio going and doing dishes.

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

I don't know... is something better than nothing... even if it is too little too late?



Majority Statement on Elections

The Georgia Senate Republicans have heard the calls of millions of Georgians who have raised deep and heartfelt concerns that state law has been violated and our elections process abused in our November 3, 2020 elections. We will fix this.

Our state constitution precludes us from calling a special session due to the lack of a three-fifths majority in both chambers. As constitutionalists, we must respect that. Even if we could secure the requisite numbers to convene, our laws provide no avenue for us to retroactively alter the results from November 3, 2020.  However, an avenue to move this matter even quicker than special session now exists and is pending before the United States Supreme Court.

As the upper chamber of the General Assembly and consistent with our prerogatives for legislative oversight:

We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.

We insist that all counties immediately preserve all data from the November 3, 2020 General Election in order to conduct a forensic audit. We also call on these counties to perform a signature audit. We call on the State Elections Board to oversee and monitor that closely.

We will continue to conduct public hearings up to and through January 5, 2021 to ensure that fraud and misconduct do not taint the next election.

We will fully fund the Secretary of State’s call to investigate out-of-state residents who attempt to move here for the sole purpose of voting in our run-off. We will make sure that these criminals are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

We call upon the Secretary of State to immediately release a certified list of all voters in the November 3, 2020 General Election and a certified list of all newly registered voters in Georgia from October 5-December 7, 2020.

As soon as we may constitutionally convene, we will pass legislation to reverse the detrimental effects of the consent decree which was entered into in March 2020.

As soon as we may constitutionally convene, we will reform our election laws to secure our electoral process by eliminating at-will absentee voting. We will require photo identification for absentee voting for cause, and we will crack down on ballot harvesting by outlawing drop boxes.

Posterity and legitimacy of our Republic – guaranteed to us by our Constitution – require no less than our diligence, our time, and our utmost attention. Do not fall prey to the ploys of the Left, who would have you stay home and not exercise your right to vote on January 5, 2021. We cannot protect the Republic without you. Join the Senate Republican Caucus to ensure we get every possible legal vote cast in the run-off election. An overwhelming victory for our Senators and our Public Service Commissioner on January 5, 2021 will send a strong message!