Election Fraud Evidence Thread (Read 529646 times)

aletheuo137

MauiAxis

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #881 on: December 08, 2020, 06:56:32 PM »
Aint nuthin gonna change.

There has been no evidence of fraud, the courts and judges hear both sides and see all the evidence, not just the bits cherrypicked and posted on parler. The states determine their own election processes.

You all can continue deluding yourselves, or just get over it and accept the truth. Trump is just dragging this out to get more of your money to line his pockets.

Occam’s razor.

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #882 on: December 08, 2020, 07:04:51 PM »
Aint nuthin gonna change.

There has been no evidence of fraud, the courts and judges hear both sides and see all the evidence, not just the bits cherrypicked and posted on parler. The states determine their own election processes.

You all can continue deluding yourselves, or just get over it and accept the truth. Trump is just dragging this out to get more of your money to line his pockets.

Occam’s razor.
Your claim that anything you write is remotely related to the application of Occam's Razor is ludicrously preposterous. Again.

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #884 on: December 08, 2020, 07:38:05 PM »

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #885 on: December 08, 2020, 08:00:41 PM »
Jay Sekulow, and others, on the Texas case at SCOTUS. Total time: 4:55

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #886 on: December 08, 2020, 08:29:50 PM »
Okay, now let's see the resident philosopher, champion of (his (mis?)understanding of) Occam's Razor, use that methodology to analyze this:

Statistician in Texas Lawsuit Against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin Says Probability of Biden Winning Election Was One in a Quadrillion!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/statistician-texas-lawsuit-georgia-michigan-pennsylvania-wisconsin-says-probability-biden-winning-election-one-quadrillion/

USC and former Harvard statistician determines that the possibility of Joe Biden winning the states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin were basically statistically impossible.
We reported on a case this morning coming out of Texas challenging 2020 Presidential election actions of four states, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia and Pennsylvania:

[The filing is included in the post above.]  The court later today decided to take this case up.

In the filing, a statistician notes that the probability of Joe Biden winning these four states was basically impossible as reported at the Election Wizard:

A new lawsuit filed today, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block four battleground states – Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, from casting “unlawful and constitutionally tainted votes” in the Electoral College.

In the brief submitted to the Supreme Court, Texas includes a declaration from Pacific Economics Group member and USC economics professor, Charles J. Cicchetti, Ph.D.

Dr. Cicchetti is the former Deputy Director at the Energy and Environmental Policy Center at Harvard University’s John Kennedy School of Government and received his Ph.D. in economics from Rutgers University.

According to Dr. Cicchetti, his calculations show the probability of Joe Biden winning the popular vote in the four states independently given President Trump’s early lead in those States as of 3 a.m. on November 4, 2020, is less than one in a quadrillion.

Dr. Cicchetti’s analysis calculates that for Joe Biden to win all four states collectively, the odds of that event happening decrease to less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power (1 in 1 1,000,000,000,000,0004).

This analysis by a world respected statistician is shocking and it agrees with what we previously reported.  The results of the election in these states and others were basically impossible:

Everyone knows Joe Biden did not receive more votes than Barack Obama, let alone the most popular President in US history, President Donald Trump.

Biden beating Trump legitimately was basically impossible. We know it.  They know it. It was a rigged election.

aletheuo137

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #887 on: December 09, 2020, 08:00:09 AM »
Aint nuthin gonna change.

There has been no evidence of fraud, the courts and judges hear both sides and see all the evidence, not just the bits cherrypicked and posted on parler. The states determine their own election processes.

You all can continue deluding yourselves, or just get over it and accept the truth. Trump is just dragging this out to get more of your money to line his pockets.

Occam’s razor.
It maybe true but you and I don't get to decide that. Last I checked, don't have a law degree, do you?

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #888 on: December 09, 2020, 09:00:35 AM »
Texas AG 6-minute explanation of the Texas SCOTUS lawsuit on Hannity last night:

drck1000

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #889 on: December 09, 2020, 10:21:42 AM »
Have been seeing a recurring comment posted on many SM threads.  That Trump is delaying concession is to "line his pockets".  Ok, I'm admittedly not really informed with "insider information", but WTF is that all about?  Doesn't make sense.

Both sides that are on the extreme are loony IMO.  I tend to be close to middle on many issues, politics being one of them.  But I dunno where folks get some of these things, but furthermore, get so invested that they can't believe or even consider alternate views. 

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #890 on: December 09, 2020, 10:36:24 AM »
Have been seeing a recurring comment posted on many SM threads.  That Trump is delaying concession is to "line his pockets".  Ok, I'm admittedly not really informed with "insider information", but WTF is that all about?  Doesn't make sense.

Both sides that are on the extreme are loony IMO.  I tend to be close to middle on many issues, politics being one of them.  But I dunno where folks get some of these things, but furthermore, get so invested that they can't believe or even consider alternate views.
I have a lot of friends with TDS who have been saying since he was elected he is taking money from the Russians and the Chinese and making money hand over fist as president. All corruption as he is the most corrupt president ever. All the while his personal worth has dropped over a billion dollars but once again that is a fact that is ignored. Also, a lot of his businesses are in NY where business has dropped off significantly and he is taking losses in those businesses as well. But the facts fall on deaf ears.
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

macsak

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #891 on: December 09, 2020, 10:52:54 AM »
Have been seeing a recurring comment posted on many SM threads.  That Trump is delaying concession is to "line his pockets".  Ok, I'm admittedly not really informed with "insider information", but WTF is that all about?  Doesn't make sense.

Both sides that are on the extreme are loony IMO. I tend to be close to middle on many issues, politics being one of them.  But I dunno where folks get some of these things, but furthermore, get so invested that they can't believe or even consider alternate views.

so you're INDEPENDENT
just like your twin...

drck1000

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #892 on: December 09, 2020, 11:19:06 AM »
I have a lot of friends with TDS who have been saying since he was elected he is taking money from the Russians and the Chinese and making money hand over fist as president. All corruption as he is the most corrupt president ever. All the while his personal worth has dropped over a billion dollars but once again that is a fact that is ignored. Also, a lot of his businesses are in NY where business has dropped off significantly and he is taking losses in those businesses as well. But the facts fall on deaf ears.

Proof?   ???

Wild conspiracy?  But folks have no problems parroting that, but looking for concrete and/or court decided proof on other issues.

so you're INDEPENDENT
just like your twin...
Danny Devito?  Or Ahnohld? 

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #893 on: December 09, 2020, 11:58:00 AM »
Proof?   ???

Wild conspiracy?  But folks have no problems parroting that, but looking for concrete and/or court decided proof on other issues.
Danny Devito?  Or Ahnohld?
Exactly. There are no court cases because there is no corruption. And according to our resident arbiter of truth, without a court decision there is no fraud and corruption. So by his logic, Trump is a Boy Scout!  :rofl:
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #894 on: December 09, 2020, 12:54:32 PM »
Proof?   ???

Wild conspiracy?  But folks have no problems parroting that, but looking for concrete and/or court decided proof on other issues.
Danny Devito?  Or Ahnohld?

So if your twin is ahnohld, that makes you devito?  :rofl:

Don't forget Trump also donated every 1 of his paychecks.  So he lost a few million over the past 4 years just in that alone.

I know he's gonna make it all up on the back end once he is no longer president.  Public speaking and a tell all book come to mind.  Fingers crossed that Vivid makes Melania an offier.  Or any of the other Trump daughters.  If Casey Anthony was offered $1,000,000; Melania gotta be getting way more than that.

drck1000

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #895 on: December 09, 2020, 01:10:57 PM »
So if your twin is ahnohld, that makes you devito?  :rofl:

Don't forget Trump also donated every 1 of his paychecks.  So he lost a few million over the past 4 years just in that alone.

I know he's gonna make it all up on the back end once he is no longer president.  Public speaking and a tell all book come to mind.  Fingers crossed that Vivid makes Melania an offier.  Or any of the other Trump daughters.  If Casey Anthony was offered $1,000,000; Melania gotta be getting way more than that.
Ok. So how does the timeframe from Nov 4 to Jan 20 make him so much more money? Rush to get shady things in place? 

Like anyone before him didn’t do that. For the ENTIRE time they were in office. Not just Presidents.

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #896 on: December 09, 2020, 02:10:40 PM »
Ok. So how does the timeframe from Nov 4 to Jan 20 make him so much more money? Rush to get shady things in place? 

Like anyone before him didn’t do that. For the ENTIRE time they were in office. Not just Presidents.

Meant after he is done being POTUS, whether that's on Jan 20,2021 or Jan 20 2024.

drck1000

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #897 on: December 09, 2020, 02:19:51 PM »
Meant after he is done being POTUS, whether that's on Jan 20,2021 or Jan 20 2024.
Yup. I get what you were saying. Trying to see what the “Trump is lining his pockets by not conceding” folks mean.

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #898 on: December 09, 2020, 03:29:09 PM »
Exactly. There are no court cases because there is no corruption. And according to our resident arbiter of truth, without a court decision there is no fraud and corruption. So by his logic, Trump is a Boy Scout!  :rofl:

Its true, hence why I have never said trump is a "sexual assaulter" it was never proven in court. Settlements don't count haha.  So until he is convicted.  I just think he has unknown ethical, moral and business decisions.  It doesn't look good for him but without proof he is innocent, until proven guilty.

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #899 on: December 09, 2020, 03:30:55 PM »
Yup. I get what you were saying. Trying to see what the “Trump is lining his pockets by not conceding” folks mean.

Its the donations to him.  I believe that is what they are referring too.  If I remember correctly all donations made to "combat the steal" are his to use as he wants.   I think he got like 200mil in donations or something.
But I actually don't think this is wrong, people are free to do what they want with their money and trump made disclaimers so its perfectly legit.