Election Fraud Evidence Thread (Read 522955 times)

changemyoil66

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1020 on: December 11, 2020, 02:56:00 PM »
I don’t know what the backup plan would be? I am just disappointed that SCOTUS refused to protect the voting process. I have lost faith in the system. No matter the ruling I think they should have taken it in order to protect our country. It is truly a shame..
Was their ruling based that TX should mind their own business?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1021 on: December 11, 2020, 02:57:00 PM »
Hey Pissant. explain to all of us what Trump had to do with the Supreme Court case? I would love to hear more stupidity.  :rofl:

He supported the case?  Wanted to join it?  If all those votes were thrown out he would win? 

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1022 on: December 11, 2020, 02:57:54 PM »
Was their ruling based that TX should mind their own business?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Basically.  States can't interfere with others.  And no merit was seen in the accusations to override that.

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1023 on: December 11, 2020, 03:05:06 PM »
It’s official. Biden is our next president. SCOTUS denied hearing the Texas lawsuit as reported by two reliable sources.
As I stated above, I feared only Alito and Thomas would stand up to the bullshit.



Here's the whole two paragraphs in more readable form:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/121120zr_p860.pdf

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1024 on: December 11, 2020, 03:08:25 PM »
Clearly you must be smarter than 9 supreme court justices.  and 6 conservative judges on that court  :crazy:

Whatever your unknown "point" is, you lost.  The justice system clearly doesn't believe in it.  Unless the secret democrat cabal also influenced the 6 conservative justices along with millions of other Americans.
Just more lies from you.  :rofl: You are a piece of work aren’t you? You know what my point is. You lie about knowing what the Supreme Court case is about but you are totally ignorant of what it entails. That is my point. It is not unknown to you since lying is part of your personality. You are lying about not knowing what my point is. Trying to avoid it is totally stupid. Why don’t you grow up and grow a pair and admit you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about. Again. How many times is it now?  :rofl:

Oh, and if you truly believe I lost whatever it may be, then since you and I live in the same country that means you lost as well.  :rofl:
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1025 on: December 11, 2020, 03:11:39 PM »
As I stated above, I feared only Alito and Thomas would stand up to the bullshit.

Here's the whole two paragraphs in more readable form:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/121120zr_p860.pdf
I agree. I think you are right. No backbone.

It’s too bad the pissant doesn’t understand what standing is. He is lying again about why the SCOTUS didn’t take the case. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1026 on: December 11, 2020, 03:20:02 PM »
He supported the case?  Wanted to join it?  If all those votes were thrown out he would win?
You said it was Trump’s last chance. Last chance at what? If you understood what the Supreme Court case was about you would understand this has nothing to do with trump. Trump requested to join the case but the case was not his. The case was only about how the states pick their electors. There is no guarantee that a favorable ruling would have changed the outcome at all. But if you knew anything about the case and not lie about it you would know that. Stupid ass.

Once again, the court case has nothing to do with votes or fraud or anything like that. Idiot.
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

macsak

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1027 on: December 11, 2020, 03:45:27 PM »
And now that's settled. Figured this would happen.  I guess not even the supreme court says there is mass fraud.  Guess that settles it.

it only settles the fact that you still don't get it
well, actually that was settled science years ago...

robtmc

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1028 on: December 11, 2020, 03:57:25 PM »
it only settles the fact that you still don't get it
well, actually that was settled science years ago...
That pissant is really dense, the SC said not a thing about the fraud,
Just that Texas had no say in other state's election chicanery.

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1029 on: December 11, 2020, 04:03:24 PM »
That pissant is really dense, the SC said not a thing about the fraud,
Just that Texas had no say in other state's election chicanery.
You are all wrong, it’s all about the SC saying that fraud didn’t happen and there is no evidence of it and it is now not going to take away votes and it was Trump’s last chance. [/sarcasm] 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

He doesn’t even know what standing is. He never read the complaint and couldn’t understand if he did. He is just parroting the media lies he hears/reads. He really doesn’t get it. Sad.
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1030 on: December 11, 2020, 04:39:31 PM »
I literally said before that the reason the court dismissed the case was because states cant sue others.  AND that all the fraud accusations in the world couldn't convince them to hear the case.  All other cases in other states about fraud have failed. 

Basically.  States can't interfere with others.  And no merit was seen in the accusations to override that.

Still waiting on all your accusations of mass fraud to be proved in court.  Until then, there is NO mass fraud.  It's time for people to start accepting and admitting it.  If you disagree, bring it to court and actually manage to win for once.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1031 on: December 11, 2020, 05:26:16 PM »
So, if a candidate can't sue a state, a state voter can't sue the state, and another state can't sue a state -- all based on the Supreme Court's rulings of standing -- then how the hell does anybody "CONTEST" a presidential election to the Supreme Court?

Starting to look like there's no way to trigger a contested election even if swing states continue to ignore the constitution, their state constitutions, and existing law.

WTH is the Supreme Court's job if not to settle legal questions between states? 

Didn't the Civil War start over a dispute among states?  Is that the only recourse left?
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1032 on: December 11, 2020, 05:55:22 PM »
Some facts about the Georgia election signature mismatch rejection rates by county. Will the resident pseudo-philosopher please apply his vaunted Occam's Razor here? Show us your work.

Of Georgia’s 159 counties, 100 did not reject a single absentee ballot because of a signature mismatch.

The data revealed significant differences in rejection rates across counties, indicating that the signature matching process is being applied unequally across the state.

In contrast to the 100 counties that did not reject a single ballot for a mismatched signature, the rejection rate in Taylor County (2.09%) was more than forty times higher than the statewide rejection rate. Likewise, the rejection rate in Clay County (1.20%) was more than twenty times higher than the statewide rate.

The vast disparity in rejection rates cannot be explained by population size. For instance, Georgia’s least populous county, Taliaferro County, had the third highest rejection rate of 0.65%, while Georgia’s second least populous county, Quitman County, rejected zero ballots.

The disparity also cannot be explained based on a county’s geographic location: Of the ten contiguous counties comprising the Atlanta region, two counties (Douglas and Rockdale) rejected zero ballots for mismatched signatures, while three others (Fayette, Gwinnett, and Henry) had rejection rates far exceeding the statewide average.

Georgia’s recently low signature rejection rate is dramatically lower than signature rejection rates from other states. For example, Nevada’s rejection rate for mismatched signatures in the 2020 general election was 0.42% -- more than eight times higher than Georgia’s rejection rate.

No known statistical analysis supports the county-by-county rejection rates for mismatched signatures. To the contrary, the analysis establishes that the likelihood of obtaining the rejection rates as reported by ten of the counties (Cherokee, Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton, Dougherty, Gwinnett, Henry, Liberty, and Taylor) is practically zero, with a statistical likelihood of less than 0.01%.

* * * * *
I guess since Occam used his Razor (often paraphrased as "the simplest explanation is most likely the correct explanation") to prove that "miracles" were the work of "God"... here we have another miracle (statistical likelihood of less than 0.01%). Thus that proves it was the work of "God". Q.E.D.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2020, 06:00:37 PM by punaperson »

ren

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1033 on: December 11, 2020, 06:32:52 PM »
well if OJ got away with it and Hillary was able to get a murderer off....
Deeds Not Words

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1034 on: December 11, 2020, 07:28:06 PM »
A couple of people's thoughts on possible next steps given the SCOTUS denial of cert for the Texas lawsuit. (Not like that's the end of things by any means, but it seems that a lot of people put a lot of hope and expectation into that one...).







punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1035 on: December 11, 2020, 07:41:06 PM »
Giuliani 4 minute response on NewsMax with Grant Stinchfield (embedded in tweet):

https://twitter.com/i/status/1337577914758352898



And here's co-counsel Jenna Ellis:



One minute interview embedded in tweet: https://twitter.com/i/status/1337568282396811265

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1036 on: December 11, 2020, 08:02:28 PM »
WHAT NOW? The Fight for Our Freedom Continues Despite SCOTUS Ruling on Texas

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/now-fight-freedom-continues-despite-scotus-ruling-texas/

There are still court cases in nearly every state of concern.  Below is our understanding of open cases as of Friday night:

In Pennsylvania Rudy has a case he plans to take to the US Supreme Court.  The couple congressmen from Pennsylvania still have a case at the US Supreme Court where they argue that how absentee ballots were processed in the state was unconstitutional.

In Michigan an Obama judge threw out Sidney Powell’s case claiming massive corruption in the election process in the state.  The judge must think carting tens of thousands of ballots into a counting area with no Republicans present is entirely fine.  Powell has suggested she will forward this to the US Supreme Court.

In Georgia Lin Wood has a case now at the Supreme Court.  Sidney Powell has a case which was thrown out which she plans to bring to the Supreme Court.  President Trump has filed an emergency petition with the Supreme Court in Georgia.

In Arizona the RNC and Sidney Powell both have cases they are sending to the Supreme Court.

In Wisconsin President Trump has a case in progress with the Wisconsin Elections Commission.

In Nevada its Supreme Court dismissed President Trump’s election appeal.  We are not sure if this is going on to the US Supreme Court or not.

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1037 on: December 11, 2020, 08:06:56 PM »
Trump Legal Team Files Emergency Petition With the Supreme Court of Georgia

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/breaking-trump-legal-team-files-emergency-petition-supreme-court-georgia/

President Donald Trump’s legal team has filed an emergency petition in the Supreme Court of Georgia.

The petition comes just hours after the Supreme Court denied Texas’ bid to challenge voting procedures in four states and investigate voter fraud.

The petition seeks a Writ of Certiorari to review the court order of Justice Constance C. Russell earlier this month, who the Trump campaign contends was not qualified to preside over the election contest or enter orders in the case.

The campaign is seeking to decertify the results of the election in Georgia, which has been the subject of extreme controversy due to the extreme irregularities with the votes.

The 248-page petition can be read in full here. [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EMA5VRJSoUUzlwgs4iPRi5Me4JsvpWwZ/view]

President Trump has filed a massive lawsuit in Fulton County, some of the highlights include 2,560 felons who voted, 66,247 underage voters, and 2,423 votes from people who were not registered.

The lawsuit additionally lists 1,043 individuals registered at PO boxes, 4,926 individuals who voted in Georgia after registering in another state, 395 individuals who voted in two states, 15,700 votes from people who moved out of state before the election, 40,279 votes of people who moved without re-registering in their new county and 30,000 – 40,000 absentee ballots lacking proper signature matching and verification.

The legal team included numerous affidavits and outlined over 30 violations of Georgia laws and codes.

Currently, Biden leads the state with 2,473,633 votes to Trump’s 2,461,854. The lawsuit has highlighted nearly 200,000 illegal votes, more than enough to change the results.

“Georgia officials who have fecklessly asserted that the general election was an ‘amazing success’ ‘with no credible evidence of irregularity’ are undermining public confidence in the integrity of our elections,” State Republican Chairman David Shafer said when announcing the lawsuit.

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1038 on: December 11, 2020, 08:25:24 PM »
One minute Trump tweet video re stolen election:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1337534034377920523

And a 30 section video on the same subject:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1337541208831307776

Note: None of the claims in these videos have been adjudicated as 100% valid in a court of law. I.e. "False until proven true."  :rofl:

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1039 on: December 12, 2020, 12:47:00 AM »
WHAT NOW? The Fight for Our Freedom Continues Despite SCOTUS Ruling on Texas

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/now-fight-freedom-continues-despite-scotus-ruling-texas/

There are still court cases in nearly every state of concern.  Below is our understanding of open cases as of Friday night:

In Pennsylvania Rudy has a case he plans to take to the US Supreme Court.  The couple congressmen from Pennsylvania still have a case at the US Supreme Court where they argue that how absentee ballots were processed in the state was unconstitutional.

In Michigan an Obama judge threw out Sidney Powell’s case claiming massive corruption in the election process in the state.  The judge must think carting tens of thousands of ballots into a counting area with no Republicans present is entirely fine.  Powell has suggested she will forward this to the US Supreme Court.

In Georgia Lin Wood has a case now at the Supreme Court.  Sidney Powell has a case which was thrown out which she plans to bring to the Supreme Court.  President Trump has filed an emergency petition with the Supreme Court in Georgia.

In Arizona the RNC and Sidney Powell both have cases they are sending to the Supreme Court.

In Wisconsin President Trump has a case in progress with the Wisconsin Elections Commission.

In Nevada its Supreme Court dismissed President Trump’s election appeal.  We are not sure if this is going on to the US Supreme Court or not.
Because the Texas Supreme Court case didn’t go after voter fraud or election tampering and also didn’t say or do anything regarding helping Trump win the election, I felt it had traction to get into the hands of SCOTUS. Even if there was a SCOTUS ruling in favor of finding the states election process was performed unconstitutionally, there was still a chance the the electors chosen by the state legislators would have still voted for Biden. There were never any guarantees. I wanted the Texas lawsuit to go forward because I want our election process to be done per the constitution. And not have rogue states open themselves up to the type of proven fraud we all saw. This is a huge blow to our republic. With that said, I don’t think any of these cases are going to have much of a chance to get traction with the Supreme Court. If the Texas lawsuit would not be heard due to standing then I don’t think any of the lawsuits will be heard for the same reason. JMHO
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!