Semantics... point is he wasn't found guilty.

no, it's not semantics

‘I can either sit back and be a part of the surrender caucus, or I can fight for our country.’

Mo Brooks with Lou Dobbs on why he will challenge the electors from the high voter fraud states [maybe someone already posted this, if so, my apologies].

Since Brooks is having trouble finding even one senator needed to send a state delegation into a debate and vote, do you think I should write and call Crazy Mazie and Dumbass Schatz and ask them to join him?

Technically yes, he is innocent.  Justice system isn't perfect but it gets it right most of the time and is the best way to find the truth we currently have.  I just better not see the republicans bitch and moan for 4 years and act hypocritical if the democrats start to criticize them.

In your train of thought about being not guilty or guilty, since Ballard has never been convicted and guilty of violating the 2a, her denying CCW, OC permits are OK.  And same goes with HI's law about 10rd pistol mags, SBR's, suppressors, bump stocks, red flag, etc...No one was convicted in court of violating the 2a in HI.

Even though "evidence" shows all the above are being done.

In your train of thought about being not guilty or guilty, since Ballard has never been convicted and guilty of violating the 2a, her denying CCW, OC permits are OK.  And same goes with HI's law about 10rd pistol mags, SBR's, suppressors, bump stocks, red flag, etc...No one was convicted in court of violating the 2a in HI.

Even though "evidence" shows all the above are being done.

Cuz no proof brah. . .

Cuz no proof brah. . .

Get proof, no guilty conviction. Focus

Get proof, no guilty conviction. Focus

No tangible proof brah. 

And now for an all too brief comedy interlude:













We now return you to your regularly scheduled Election Fraud Evidence Thread.

 

Those were pretty good! 

I heard a rumor here today in AZ. It seems that some legislators saw the results of that Dominion voting machine that the MI judge released the audit from. And now they are calling for an audit of all the Dominion voting machines used in all of Maricopa County. Which BTW has about 60%-70% of all voters in AZ. If the Dominion voting machines show the same fraudulent behavior as the one in MI then they are prepared to decertify AZ election results. Not sure this is true and there is no guarantee the machines will exhibit the same behavior but if this is true and they do exhibit the same fraudulent behavior we could be in for one big  rollercoaster ride! 

#RealLOLing

Those were pretty good! 

I heard a rumor here today in AZ. It seems that some legislators saw the results of that Dominion voting machine that the MI judge released the audit from. And now they are calling for an audit of all the Dominion voting machines used in all of Maricopa County. Which BTW has about 60%-70% of all voters in AZ. If the Dominion voting machines show the same fraudulent behavior as the one in MI then they are prepared to decertify AZ election results. Not sure this is true and there is no guarantee the machines will exhibit the same behavior but if this is true and they do exhibit the same fraudulent behavior we could be in for one big  rollercoaster ride! 

You would think by now any bad settings for a machine would be either set correctly or the machines "lost".  This election will set president for all future elections again.  Because if the DNC can cheat and get away with it, it's going to keep happening.  Wait till the famous GA senate elections soon.  I don't want a woman with a 400 credit score making and voting on laws in congress.

Those were pretty good! 

I heard a rumor here today in AZ. It seems that some legislators saw the results of that Dominion voting machine that the MI judge released the audit from. And now they are calling for an audit of all the Dominion voting machines used in all of Maricopa County. Which BTW has about 60%-70% of all voters in AZ. If the Dominion voting machines show the same fraudulent behavior as the one in MI then they are prepared to decertify AZ election results. Not sure this is true and there is no guarantee the machines will exhibit the same behavior but if this is true and they do exhibit the same fraudulent behavior we could be in for one big  rollercoaster ride! 

You must have it all wrong. I read the article in the local paper there about the subpoenas and the testimony before the state senate committee and that "news" article swore again and again 1. that all the Republicans were talking about was "unfounded" "conspiracy theories" and 2. quoted extensively and repeatedly from several "election officials" that multiple tests had been made and that all the machines and tallies were all 100% correct and anyone who said otherwise was deluded. So there.

What puzzles me is why, if those officials are correct, they are so reluctant to let the machines be forensically examined to simply confirm their claims? What would the problem be with that? Saw Finchem on War Room today saying if they can get to the machines this afternoon after the subpoenas are served, they could have the results by Monday, or maybe even Sunday. I'd think that the sooner the better for the election officials to have proof of what they say is true, and thus put an end to the baseless conspiracy theories, no? Or why would they oppose the forensic examination of the flawless machines? Asking for a friend...

[Found it...]

Arizona Senate will subpoena Maricopa County for election audit

https://www.azmirror.com/2020/12/14/arizona-senate-will-subpoena-maricopa-county-for-election-audit/

Amid false claims of election fraud spread by President Donald Trump and Arizona Republican leaders...

...senators heard testimony from the county’s elections director, the chair of its board of supervisors, one of its chief attorneys about the 2020 election and two officials with the Arizona Attorney General’s Election Integrity Unit. They all testified that there was no evidence that President-elect Joe Biden’s win was achieved by fraud, manipulation or tampering, and repeatedly shot down questions from senators based on conspiracy theories.

Throughout the hearing, Republican senators posed questions exploring a variety of conspiracy theories that have circulated on social media and even in some of the legal challenges that sought to overturn the results of the election.

Time and again, Jarrett explained why those allegations of malfeasance either weren’t possible or were ignorant of the actual protocols in place.

...Throughout the hearing, Republican senators posed questions exploring a variety of conspiracy theories that have circulated on social media and even in some of the legal challenges that sought to overturn the results of the election.

Time and again, Jarrett explained why those allegations of malfeasance either weren’t possible or were ignorant of the actual protocols in place.

“There’s no possible way for the program to be changed during the course of the election,” he told the senators.

Semantics... point is he wasn't found guilty.

Point is, you made a false statement, then tried to say it's just "semantics."

You prefaced the comment with "technically," which means you are about to say something that is TECHNICALLY ACCURATE.  "Technically" includes "semantics".

Dumbass.

You must have it all wrong. I read the article in the local paper there about the subpoenas and the testimony before the state senate committee and that "news" article swore again and again 1. that all the Republicans were talking about was "unfounded" "conspiracy theories" and 2. quoted extensively and repeatedly from several "election officials" that multiple tests had been made and that all the machines and tallies were all 100% correct and anyone who said otherwise was deluded. So there.

What puzzles me is why, if those officials are correct, they are so reluctant to let the machines be forensically examined to simply confirm their claims? What would the problem be with that? Saw Finchem on War Room today saying if they can get to the machines this afternoon after the subpoenas are served, they could have the results by Monday, or maybe even Sunday. I'd think that the sooner the better for the election officials to have proof of what they say is true, and thus put an end to the baseless conspiracy theories, no? Or why would they oppose the forensic examination of the flawless machines? Asking for a friend...

[Found it...]

Arizona Senate will subpoena Maricopa County for election audit

https://www.azmirror.com/2020/12/14/arizona-senate-will-subpoena-maricopa-county-for-election-audit/

Amid false claims of election fraud spread by President Donald Trump and Arizona Republican leaders...

...senators heard testimony from the county’s elections director, the chair of its board of supervisors, one of its chief attorneys about the 2020 election and two officials with the Arizona Attorney General’s Election Integrity Unit. They all testified that there was no evidence that President-elect Joe Biden’s win was achieved by fraud, manipulation or tampering, and repeatedly shot down questions from senators based on conspiracy theories.

Throughout the hearing, Republican senators posed questions exploring a variety of conspiracy theories that have circulated on social media and even in some of the legal challenges that sought to overturn the results of the election.

Time and again, Jarrett explained why those allegations of malfeasance either weren’t possible or were ignorant of the actual protocols in place.

...Throughout the hearing, Republican senators posed questions exploring a variety of conspiracy theories that have circulated on social media and even in some of the legal challenges that sought to overturn the results of the election.

Time and again, Jarrett explained why those allegations of malfeasance either weren’t possible or were ignorant of the actual protocols in place.

“There’s no possible way for the program to be changed during the course of the election,” he told the senators.

Well, it sounds like there is some traction to the rumor I heard today. Thanks for verifying it. Like I said in a previous post. In the next week we are going to see how this is going to play out. If those machines are fraudulent and the Republicans here have some cahones and decertify AZ’s election results then you will see the other states follow suit IMO.

So the guys in charge says don't worry and everyone is supposed to believe them?  "Trust me".

Like I said, it's been over a month, and anything could have been wiped from any machines.  The time to look into them was right after the election, not over a month later.  GOP senators asking questions just to blow smoke up their voters ass to look like they're doing something for their voters. 

So the guys in charge says don't worry and everyone is supposed to believe them?  "Trust me".

Like I said, it's been over a month, and anything could have been wiped from any machines.  The time to look into them was right after the election, not over a month later.  GOP senators asking questions just to blow smoke up their voters ass to look like they're doing something for their voters.

I agree, but there is still a chance no one has messed with them or possibly left some bread crumbs.

WI Supreme Court Rules the State Did Not Have Authority to Abandon Voter ID Rules Due to Covid

https://thegreggjarrett.com/wi-supreme-court-rules-state-did-not-have-authority-to-abandon-voter-id-rules-due-to-covid/

Just the News reports that court filings show nearly 200,000 voters declared themselves permanently confined for the state’s primary in the spring, and even more people did for the general election. “The ruling opens the doors for Republicans to potentially challenge those votes if it can be shown the voters weren’t sick or elderly as required by the law.”

If AZ decertifies its election results, will WI be next? Or will WI beat AZ to the punch?

I've been listening to the Colorado Legislative Hearing on Election "Issues".

If you get a chance, Mr. Smith is pretty impressive.  He breaks down most of the points he's uncovered in the lack of security, and lack of ability to certify, the Dominion voting machines used.

He was the lead for oversight of the GPS Systems Development and deployment.

If you listen to this very detailed IT testimony, questions and answers, and still have any degree of faith that the election was "the most secure in history", you need to be reeducated.  Your Liberal brainwashing has been successful.

Not going to go into details.  Let's just say that none of the states that certified the machines for use, nor the 3rd party companies they relied on to test them, had a fricking clue about cybersecurity, physical security nor a proper certification or maintenance process.

It just ended, so the live link is no use now.  I don't see an archive link yet, but here's a report.  Search YT later if interested in listening.  It's audio only.

https://coloradonewsline.com/briefs/colorado-lawmakers-hold-hearing-on-election-integrity/

From other thread. Thought this was a good video.

2020 Election Investigative Documentary: Who’s Stealing America? By Josh Phillips

https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/2020-election-investigation-who-is-stealing-america_3617562.html

2020 Election Investigative Documentary: Who’s Stealing America? By Josh Phillips

https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/2020-election-investigation-who-is-stealing-america_3617562.html

I'm sorry, but until that documentary has been litigated and found factual in a court of law it's default status is "fake news" and baseless unfounded conspiracy theories.