Can you into statistics?  Polls are based on numbers bro.  Its literally trying to find the percentages of majority or minority...

 

I can make a thread about how the world is flat,  people can post in that thread showing support.  All of this doesn't make it true.   

Says the genius who just posted that polls determine what's true.

 

I can make a thread about how the world is flat,  people can post in that thread showing support.  All of this doesn't make it true.   

All I know is when I type MASS ELECTION FRAUD OCCURRED it gets your panties in a wad and you can’t help your self but to post more moronic shit! 

Says the genius who just posted that polls determine what's true.

 

The guy is a moron. What do you expect? 

Says the genius who just posted that polls determine what's true.

 

Says the genius who cant understand the entire point of the polls was to prove that as a fact of American opinion, a majority believe there was no stolen election and mass fraud.

The polls are literally determining what is true,  because truth is the opinions of people on what they THINK about. 

Unless you somehow think polls determine that there was no mass fraud....that's what the courts did 

Says the genius who cant understand the entire point of the polls was to prove that as a fact of American opinion, a majority believe there was no stolen election and mass fraud.

The polls are literally determining what is true,  because truth is the opinions of people on what they THINK about. 

Unless you somehow think polls determine that there was no mass fraud....that's what the courts did 

typical millenial BS attitude
"speak YOUR truth"

typical millenial BS attitude
"speak YOUR truth"

Doesn’t matter what the truth is. Your opinion/theory is your truth. Another moronic statement from the “Village Idiot”. 

Says the genius who cant understand the entire point of the polls was to prove that as a fact of American opinion, a majority believe there was no stolen election and mass fraud.

The polls are literally determining what is true,  because truth is the opinions of people on what they THINK about. 

Unless you somehow think polls determine that there was no mass fraud....that's what the courts did 

Where was that proven in court? 

Go ahead.  I'll wait. . .

I can MAYBE see what you are trying to get at with "polls are literally determining what is true", but that goes counter to your prior assertions that there is no media bias. . .

"The truth is what I say it is" - Sen. Meechum

I saw 4 new pages & thought wow there must be some great updates that massive election fraud occurred. 

But no updates on the massive election fraud that occurred.

Says the genius who cant understand the entire point of the polls was to prove that as a fact of American opinion, a majority believe there was no stolen election and mass fraud.

The polls are literally determining what is true,  because truth is the opinions of people on what they THINK about. 

Unless you somehow think polls determine that there was no mass fraud....that's what the courts did 

You've learned nothing on here.

Polls are not intended to measure public opinion.

Polls are intended to shape public opinion.

I saw 4 new pages & thought wow there must be some great updates that massive election fraud occurred. 

But no updates on the massive election fraud that occurred.

There actually is some updates about what is happening out here in AZ. Some encouraging and some not so much. The problem is I know some of it was posted earlier and I don’t want to duplicate what was already posted.

As a summary the state legislature won their lawsuit in the Supreme Court that they have the right to audit the Dominion Voting Machines and the paper ballots. And their subpoenas are legal. Meaning enforceable. That’s the good news. The bad news is right after that ruling came about a shitload of shredded ballots were found in the trash. So the cover ups continue. We’ll see if there is any interesting information that comes out of the voting machines and what paper ballots are left.

There actually is some updates about what is happening out here in AZ. Some encouraging and some not so much. The problem is I know some of it was posted earlier and I don’t want to duplicate what was already posted.

As a summary the state legislature won their lawsuit in the Supreme Court that they have the right to audit the Dominion Voting Machines and the paper ballots. And their subpoenas are legal. Meaning enforceable. That’s the good news. The bad news is right after that ruling came about a shitload of shredded ballots were found in the trash. So the cover ups continue. We’ll see if there is any interesting information that comes out of the voting machines and what paper ballots are left.

Hillary demolished devices with hammers and ordered the deletion of backups that were under subpoena at the time.  They also erased 33K emails and used BleachBit to wipe the storage devices on all their laptops.  After all that, there were still very highly classified information found on her server and other incriminating evidence.

When the power structure doesn't intend to prosecute, people get away with their cover-ups.

I saw 4 new pages & thought wow there must be some great updates that massive election fraud occurred. 

But no updates on the massive election fraud that occurred.

Can't update on something that hasn't happened. 

typical millenial BS attitude
"speak YOUR truth"

Not really.  The truth of opinion and polls, is that opinion.  Its all about what people think.  Polls are not scientific theory consensus. 

If 60% of America believes that the election is legit, that just proves that a majority of Americans think it was legit.  Doesn't prove if it was or wasn't the courts decided that one 

Its only been 120-ish days one day you all hopefully will get over it and accept the facts/truth.  No mass fraud.  Still willing to place legal wagers with anyone on that 

Its only been 120-ish days one day you all hopefully will get over it and accept the facts/truth. 

Not gonna happen.  Hopefully one day you and others like you will get over it and accept that fact/truth.

There actually is some updates about what is happening out here in AZ. Some encouraging and some not so much. The problem is I know some of it was posted earlier and I don’t want to duplicate what was already posted.

As a summary the state legislature won their lawsuit in the Supreme Court that they have the right to audit the Dominion Voting Machines and the paper ballots. And their subpoenas are legal. Meaning enforceable. That’s the good news. The bad news is right after that ruling came about a shitload of shredded ballots were found in the trash. So the cover ups continue. We’ll see if there is any interesting information that comes out of the voting machines and what paper ballots are left.

Thank you for the wiki notes.
I'll go look for the post about the massive election fraud that occurred

Name one case in this post-election cover-up where any judge listened to the evidence. 

It's one thing to blather about hypothetical "Not necessarily" garbage.  It's another to stick to the facts.

Since the judges in these actual cases refused to even consider the evidence being offered, your little lecture is one again off base.

Name ones where they did refuse to consider any evidence. Show how they looked at the case and didn't look at any evidence before or during the trial. I never claimed that they did look at the evidence, I only was showing that you are wrong about your statement that judges only hear evidence during the trial.

Some were kicked out for not having standing so of course they aren't going to take the time to hear evidence.

I listened and watched the various claims of fraud and it was always a moving goalpost. First it was that votes weren't verified and when they had been then it was that claims weren't investigated and when they had been investigated then it was that courts need to decide, then when the courts tossed out the case it was that the courts didn't hear all the evidence, and when one of the cases was declined by the SCOTUS it was turning to blame judges for being anti-Trump (despite the fact he nominated 3 of them). I strongly suspect that no matter how many investigators, officials, courts, etc heard the "evidence" it would never be good enough. Why? Because the diehard Trump followers aren't looking for the truth, they are looking for validation.

Who the hell is "we?"  You referring to yourself as the "royal we"?  Or do you include the idiotic voices in your head?

You don't speak for me, so maybe just stick to voicing your own opinions. Leave the rest of "us" out of your opinions and beliefs.  As Inspector plainly said, you using "we" is an attempt to claim your opinion is the one held by some group.  Unless you represent that group, try being honest -- use "I'.

We as in people with brains who can logically reason through arguments. Sorry, I thought you were among that crowd.

 
"we cannot conclude" would in my sentence be the same as "it cannot be concluded".
I am not making an opinion statement and saying that you share it, I am not speaking for you. If you said to me "we cannot add 2 and 2 and come out with 5" I wouldn't accuse you of trying to speak for me.

We as in people with brains who can logically reason through arguments. Sorry, I thought you were among that crowd.

 
"we cannot conclude" would in my sentence be the same as "it cannot be concluded".
I am not making an opinion statement and saying that you share it, I am not speaking for you. If you said to me "we cannot add 2 and 2 and come out with 5" I wouldn't accuse you of trying to speak for me.

Typical.  Your comment just demonstrated why your use of "we" is ignorant.

You were trying to give your individual opinion more weight by PRETENDING others with some sort of authority or knowledge also share it.  But, you can't name a single one of them.

 

Typical.  Your comment just demonstrated why your use of "we" is ignorant.

You were trying to give your individual opinion more weight by PRETENDING others with some sort of authority or knowledge also share it.  But, you can't name a single one of them.

 

You confuse logic and opinion. Hint: They aren't the same.