Here the New York Times repeats the Safety Cult dogma written of above wherein the "public health safety mandates" will need to be maintained essentially forever, because "THE VIRUS!!!" In this case specifically "cloth face coverings" (aka "masks"), because, as stated above, there is currently no evidence that a successfully vaccinated person may not be a carrier of enough viral load to be infectious to others. And since you can't prove a negative, this will be the case with all the measures (close the dangerous small businesses, etc.) as long as even one case (even falsely designated as a positive RT-PCR test result) of THE VIRUS!!! is detected anywhere. the maskholes are delusional (as per the psychiatrist commentary above) and therefore nothing presented as concrete verifiable evidence of their stupidity will ever have any bearing on their decisions. Why do you want to kill grandma?
New York Times: You Must Wear A Mask Even After Getting A Vaccinehttps://thefederalist.com/2020/12/09/new-york-times-you-must-wear-a-mask-even-after-getting-a-vaccine/A New York Times article published Tuesday claims that even after people receive a dose of either the Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, they will need to wear a mask in public, marking a stark contrast to what elected leaders and health officials have implied about a return to “normal” once a vaccine arrives.
“Here’s Why Vaccinated People Still Need to Wear a Mask,” the headline reads.
While trials from both of the main U.S. vaccine manufacturers and suppliers suggest that the vaccine is approximately 95 percent effective, a number that was labeled “truly striking,” by Dr. Anthony Fauci, the New York Times asserts that masks, should still be in regular use even after the vaccine is distributed and administered.
“If vaccinated people are silent spreaders of the virus, they may keep it circulating in their communities, putting unvaccinated people at risk,” the article warns, ignoring the science showing that mask efficacy is questionable.
Even though the article appears to express concerns that the vaccine which is injected into muscle might not provide antibodies to the nose and throat to prevent the spread of the virus, the author refutes this claim several paragraphs later by quoting experts and a study that “suggests that a strong immune response in the blood would also protect mucosal tissues.”
“Only people who have virus teeming in their nose and throat would be expected to transmit the virus, and the lack of symptoms in the immunized people who became infected suggests that the vaccine may have kept the virus levels in check,” the author wrote.