The COVID Cult (Read 1514347 times)

punaperson

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2700 on: March 26, 2021, 08:56:11 PM »

punaperson

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2701 on: March 26, 2021, 08:59:12 PM »
The case fatality rate has increased by nearly 8% since China Bidet took office and instituted his plan to defeat THE VIRUS!!! on January 20.

punaperson

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2702 on: March 26, 2021, 09:05:29 PM »

macsak

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2703 on: March 26, 2021, 09:16:01 PM »
Easy he ran against a more brain dead opponent.

you were running for president?

aletheuo137

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2704 on: March 26, 2021, 09:40:22 PM »


Easy he ran against a more brain dead opponent.



Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

punaperson

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2705 on: March 27, 2021, 07:12:27 AM »
Where's the outrage from the SAFETY CULT re the lack of a true and effective investigation into the source of THE VIRUS!!! You'd think they'd want to make sure everyone is SAFE in the future by preventing such an event ever again, unless...

https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/bio-slams-daszakwho-for-peddling-ccp-disinfo/

Award-Winning Biologist Slams Peter Daszak And WHO COVID Colleagues For Peddling Chinese Communist Party ‘Disinformation.’

Molecular biologist Dr. Richard Elbright insisted that World Health Organization COVID-19 investigators – especially Peter Daszak – were “participants in disinformation” on their recent mission to China to uncover the origin of the virus.
Dr. Elbright, the current Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University and Laboratory Director at the Waksman Institute of American Society for Biochemistry Microbiology, has over 160 publications and more than 40 issued and pending patents under his name. He has received a wide array of awards, including honors from the National Institutes of Health. He is also a Fellow of the American Association for Advancement of Science, the American Academy of Microbiology, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

When asked if he felt if “the final report of this WHO/China joint team is going to shut down COVID origin controversy,” Dr. Elbright responded: “no.”

His interview with Independent Science News [https://www.independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/an-interview-with-richard-ebright-anthony-fauci-francis-collins-systematically-thwarted/] continued, as he outlined the missing components from the World Health Organization’s (WHO) recent mission emphasizing “a credible investigation also would have had conflict-of-interest-free investigators, not persons who were subjects of the research and/or closely associated with subjects of the investigation”:

A credible investigation would have had Terms of Reference that: 1) Acknowledged the possibility of laboratory origin, 2) Ensured access of investigators to records, samples, personnel, and facilities at the Wuhan laboratories that handle bat SARS-related coronaviruses, 3) Enabled collection of evidence, not mere meet-and-greet photo-ops, 4) Authorized an investigation of months, not mere days. And 5) A credible investigation also would have had conflict-of-interest-free investigators, not persons who were subjects of the research and/or closely associated with subjects of the investigation.

“Yes, its members were willing –and, in at least one case, enthusiastic– participants in disinformation,” he added before explaining thatthe pre-negotiated “Terms of Reference” for the WHO study did not even acknowledge the possibility of a laboratory origin of the virus and did not even mention the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), the Wuhan Center for Disease Control (CDC) or the Wuhan Institute of Biological Products.”[/b]

Dr. Elbright singles out Peter Daszak – who has seen his financial and research ties to the Chinese Communist Party exposed by The National Pulse – for his conflicts of interest with the Wuhan Insitute of Virology:

Yes. Daszak was the contractor who funded the laboratory at WIV that potentially was the source of the virus (with subcontracts from $200 million from the US Department of State and $7 million from the US National Institutes of Health), and he was a collaborator and co-author on research projects at the laboratory.

MassConfusion

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2706 on: March 27, 2021, 01:57:19 PM »
Just in case you still want to wear a mask,

Horowitz: Masks are experimental medical devices that must be optional, according to law
OP-ED
Emergency Use Authorization
DANIEL HOROWITZ
March 26, 2021
   
Just like the COVID vaccines, use of masks (instead of respirators) to block transmission of a virus was only authorized as experimental use. As such, according to law, it must be optional. If we are going to passively allow governors and governments to make this medical device mandatory, what is to stop them from making the vaccine mandatory?

POLL: What scares you the most?
As I've mentioned before, both the FDA and OSHA have made it clear over the years that only respirators, not masks, are considered valid PPE to block transmission of a respiratory virus. Which is why mask manufacturers must continue to place a disclaimer on their labels that the product does not work for airborne viruses. The CDC is lying to the public and giving them a false sense of security by suggesting masks are valid medical devices for COVID. That is why the FDA was forced to use an Emergency Use Authorization – the same process used for the vaccines – to approve masks as medical devices to be used as source control to reduce the spread of COVID on April 24, 2020.

This is also why in the EUA statement, the FDA discloses, "A face mask is a device, with or without a face shield, that covers the user's nose and mouth and may or may not meet fluid barrier or filtration efficiency levels." Well, indeed, any industrial hygienist or exposure expert will tell you that anything less than a fit-tested N-95 could not even be considered to meet the filtration efficiency levels. Even then, OSHA's Reparatory Protection Guidance under 29 CFR 1910.134 would require fit testing, training, proper breaks, and a medical exam in order for governments or businesses to demand that people use them in various settings.

All this is to say that with no evidence masks work, and with endless evidence that they failed to stop the spread in a single part of the world for 12 months, this is why masks, according to law, must remain optional.

Cont:
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-masks-are-experimental-medical-devices-that-must-be-optional-according-to-law
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. ― Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
 “The only difference between reality and fiction is that fiction needs to be credible.” ― Mark Twain

Inspector

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2707 on: March 27, 2021, 02:44:03 PM »
Just in case you still want to wear a mask,

Horowitz: Masks are experimental medical devices that must be optional, according to law
OP-ED
Emergency Use Authorization
DANIEL HOROWITZ
March 26, 2021
   
Just like the COVID vaccines, use of masks (instead of respirators) to block transmission of a virus was only authorized as experimental use. As such, according to law, it must be optional. If we are going to passively allow governors and governments to make this medical device mandatory, what is to stop them from making the vaccine mandatory?

POLL: What scares you the most?
As I've mentioned before, both the FDA and OSHA have made it clear over the years that only respirators, not masks, are considered valid PPE to block transmission of a respiratory virus. Which is why mask manufacturers must continue to place a disclaimer on their labels that the product does not work for airborne viruses. The CDC is lying to the public and giving them a false sense of security by suggesting masks are valid medical devices for COVID. That is why the FDA was forced to use an Emergency Use Authorization – the same process used for the vaccines – to approve masks as medical devices to be used as source control to reduce the spread of COVID on April 24, 2020.

This is also why in the EUA statement, the FDA discloses, "A face mask is a device, with or without a face shield, that covers the user's nose and mouth and may or may not meet fluid barrier or filtration efficiency levels." Well, indeed, any industrial hygienist or exposure expert will tell you that anything less than a fit-tested N-95 could not even be considered to meet the filtration efficiency levels. Even then, OSHA's Reparatory Protection Guidance under 29 CFR 1910.134 would require fit testing, training, proper breaks, and a medical exam in order for governments or businesses to demand that people use them in various settings.

All this is to say that with no evidence masks work, and with endless evidence that they failed to stop the spread in a single part of the world for 12 months, this is why masks, according to law, must remain optional.

Cont:
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-masks-are-experimental-medical-devices-that-must-be-optional-according-to-law
I have taken several OSHA training classes. And I am certified. I am also trained and certified to use my respirator. The information you provided here is correct. All the data about masks (Less than an N95) not working for protection from a virus is well known and documented many years prior to this virus. Of course it was ignored and lied about by the main stream media. So all the ignorant people who listen to the main stream media and our government officials are all running around wearing masks that have already been proven not to provide the protection they think they do.
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

omnigun

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2708 on: March 27, 2021, 03:11:19 PM »
Just in case you still want to wear a mask,

Horowitz: Masks are experimental medical devices that must be optional, according to law
OP-ED
Emergency Use Authorization
DANIEL HOROWITZ
March 26, 2021
   
Just like the COVID vaccines, use of masks (instead of respirators) to block transmission of a virus was only authorized as experimental use. As such, according to law, it must be optional. If we are going to passively allow governors and governments to make this medical device mandatory, what is to stop them from making the vaccine mandatory?

POLL: What scares you the most?
As I've mentioned before, both the FDA and OSHA have made it clear over the years that only respirators, not masks, are considered valid PPE to block transmission of a respiratory virus. Which is why mask manufacturers must continue to place a disclaimer on their labels that the product does not work for airborne viruses. The CDC is lying to the public and giving them a false sense of security by suggesting masks are valid medical devices for COVID. That is why the FDA was forced to use an Emergency Use Authorization – the same process used for the vaccines – to approve masks as medical devices to be used as source control to reduce the spread of COVID on April 24, 2020.

This is also why in the EUA statement, the FDA discloses, "A face mask is a device, with or without a face shield, that covers the user's nose and mouth and may or may not meet fluid barrier or filtration efficiency levels." Well, indeed, any industrial hygienist or exposure expert will tell you that anything less than a fit-tested N-95 could not even be considered to meet the filtration efficiency levels. Even then, OSHA's Reparatory Protection Guidance under 29 CFR 1910.134 would require fit testing, training, proper breaks, and a medical exam in order for governments or businesses to demand that people use them in various settings.

All this is to say that with no evidence masks work, and with endless evidence that they failed to stop the spread in a single part of the world for 12 months, this is why masks, according to law, must remain optional.

Cont:
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-masks-are-experimental-medical-devices-that-must-be-optional-according-to-law

Are clothes optional? Or can businesses and public grounds mandate certain attire?

Flapp_Jackson

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2709 on: March 27, 2021, 03:18:30 PM »
Are clothes optional? Or can businesses and public grounds mandate certain attire?

6 Best Clothing-Optional Resorts in the World

https://www.tripstodiscover.com/best-clothing-optional-resorts/
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

ren

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2710 on: March 27, 2021, 04:28:44 PM »
Deeds Not Words

changemyoil66

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2711 on: March 27, 2021, 06:14:03 PM »
Its been a year, did all thr maskless and gathering in large party people survive covid?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

robtmc

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2712 on: March 27, 2021, 06:38:30 PM »
6 Best Clothing-Optional Resorts in the World

https://www.tripstodiscover.com/best-clothing-optional-resorts/
I gather the majority of visitors to those places are not much of what we want to look at.  The nude beach in San Diego sure was not.

punaperson

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2713 on: March 27, 2021, 09:28:17 PM »
Nothing to see here... do as you're told.

For your SAFETY, of course.

punaperson

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2714 on: March 27, 2021, 09:39:12 PM »
For your SAFETY, of course.

That is, if you're inclined to believe fascist authoritarian know-nothings who have been wrong about everything.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9397077/Covid-19-People-choose-wear-face-masks-social-distance-rules-scrapped.html

Wearing face masks could become the norm in the UK even AFTER Covid because pandemic may cause a 'cultural change', 'Professor Lockdown' Neil Ferguson says

Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London says rules could be relaxed this year
Scientist says people's behaviour may have been changed by the pandemic
Face masks were first made mandatory on public transport in June last year

Wearing face masks could become the norm in the UK even when Covid restrictions are scrapped, one of No10's top scientific advisers said today.

'Professor Lockdown' Neil Ferguson, the epidemiologist whose grim modelling led to the first blanket shutdown last spring, said the pandemic may have caused a 'cultural change'.

But experts have previously suggested face coverings could be required for years to come, despite debates over whether they actually slow the spread of the virus.

Mary Ramsay, head of immunisation at Public Health England, last week claimed that people may need to wear face coverings and continue social distancing for several years until life gets back to normal.

The UK's chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance last month revealed that rules around mask-wearing are expected until the end of 2021.

ren

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2715 on: March 27, 2021, 09:52:15 PM »
freedom is dead. trust in the people is dead
Deeds Not Words

Jay_P

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2716 on: March 27, 2021, 11:00:36 PM »
I have taken several OSHA training classes. And I am certified. I am also trained and certified to use my respirator. The information you provided here is correct. All the data about masks (Less than an N95) not working for protection from a virus is well known and documented many years prior to this virus. Of course it was ignored and lied about by the main stream media. So all the ignorant people who listen to the main stream media and our government officials are all running around wearing masks that have already been proven not to provide the protection they think they do.

Same here. I’m in the construction industry and I personally won’t wear anything less than P100 when working with silica dust and I’m 100% sure it has larger (molecules?) than a virus. I guess what I’m getting to is that, “they,” allow us to wear basically anything to cover our nose and mouth, claiming it’s preventing transmission. Anyone with a fucking brain knows that’s not how it works.

I’ve worn a neck gaiter throughout this entire thing. I can wear my gaiter over my eyes and see fine......that ain’t stopping shit. This is beside the point but, I’ve had close contact with a coworker who tested positive and I didn’t get it; no mask, no social distancing, nothing.

I recently had a conversation with someone about how the flu just magically disappeared now that covid is around and his response was that the masks are stopping it. I asked him, “so a mask can stop the flu but not covid? They’re both viruses.......” Crickets after that.

Better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it.

ren

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2717 on: March 27, 2021, 11:02:49 PM »

I recently had a conversation with someone about how the flu just magically disappeared now that covid is around and his response was that the masks are stopping it. I asked him, “so a mask can stop the flu but not covid? They’re both viruses.......” Crickets after that.


 :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Deeds Not Words

Jay_P

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2718 on: March 27, 2021, 11:02:59 PM »
Its been a year, did all thr maskless and gathering in large party people survive covid?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Not gonna lie, all the people I know who have been doing things like it doesn’t exist didn’t get it.
Better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it.

Inspector

Re: The COVID Cult
« Reply #2719 on: March 28, 2021, 01:54:05 AM »
Same here. I’m in the construction industry and I personally won’t wear anything less than P100 when working with silica dust and I’m 100% sure it has larger (molecules?) than a virus. I guess what I’m getting to is that, “they,” allow us to wear basically anything to cover our nose and mouth, claiming it’s preventing transmission. Anyone with a fucking brain knows that’s not how it works.

I’ve worn a neck gaiter throughout this entire thing. I can wear my gaiter over my eyes and see fine......that ain’t stopping shit. This is beside the point but, I’ve had close contact with a coworker who tested positive and I didn’t get it; no mask, no social distancing, nothing.

I recently had a conversation with someone about how the flu just magically disappeared now that covid is around and his response was that the masks are stopping it. I asked him, “so a mask can stop the flu but not covid? They’re both viruses.......” Crickets after that.
I was also in the construction industry (Now retired) and for the first 20-25 years we didn’t wear masks for any reason. It has only been maybe the last 15 years or so that masks were “suggested” and eventually required. I know I have been exposed to trichlorethylene and trichlorethlane, asbestos and silica as well as cement, lime and whatever other chemicals we worked with. Plus I smoked for the first 15-16 years of my career. Education is key and I wish we had known back then what we know now.
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!