Fakenews should be flagged but not removed.   Unless its malicious from an enemy state.  I never said I support everything the biden administration is doing...never voted for them either.

so you condemn what you feel 45 did, but give a pass to 46 for something they admit?

so why did you waste all of our time arguing (not debate) your "opinion" which you didn't back up with facts, meaning it's your feels...

I was debating and see my previous post.

I listed reasons why it would be allowed.  He listed why it wouldn't.  There can be no conclusion without a judge. 

Making life uncomfortable is perfectly legal.

Another thing this idiot has never heard of ...

nuisance laws and harassment laws.

so you condemn what you feel 45 did, but give a pass to 46 for something they admit?

Nope I condemn 46 also.  Do not silence free speech and continue to fight fake news.   While protecting private rights.  No administration has done this to my satisfaction.

Another thing this idiot has never heard of ...

nuisance laws and harassment laws.

Not in scope.  Try again.  Its not harassment to not let someone use your private property.  No matter the convenience factor.  We make it "difficult" to drive is that harassment?

Not in scope.  Try again.  Its not harassment to not let someone use your private property.  No matter the convenience factor.  We make it "difficult" to drive is that harassment?

Go read legal definition of Nuisance you window licker.

Go read legal definition of Nuisance you window licker.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/nuisance

Try again.

Covid is a public nuisance. 

https://www.britannica.com/topic/nuisance

Try again.

Covid is a public nuisance. 

Swoooosh...

Fakenews should be flagged but not removed.   Unless its malicious from an enemy state.  I never said I support everything the biden administration is doing...never voted for them either.

You would have voted for them if not for us “trumpets” and our “fake news”. Remember that shit.

Its covid times,  I don't really go out much.   

https://www.google.com/search?q=right+to+refuse+service&rlz=1C1GCEA_enUS913US913&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj0yYKlgPPxAhUfJTQIHaf9AU0Q_AUoAnoECAEQBA&biw=1804&bih=852

#safetyfirst

so you admit you were wrong when you said "every"?

I was debating and see my previous post.

I listed reasons why it would be allowed.  He listed why it wouldn't.  There can be no conclusion without a judge.

Typing something you believe you know is not a "reason".  It's an opinion.

You didn't post a single thing that supports your opinion, and most of your opinions were not related to the case in question.  Just a bunch of tangential things you think you know.

Your idea of "debate" is inline with the rest of your poor vocabulary.  Debate requires more than expressing a conclusion or ancillary tidbit of information.  It requires facts and logic that a reasonable person can agree is accurate.

You aren't even close.

That's what you don't get,  that's crossing the private line.  I've never said to hurt someone financially or force anyone to suffer for public means.  That punitive punishment and not good.   Forcing someone private to pay a private tax isn't right.   But allowing private companies and businesses to make their own rules is great.  If a private range wished to charge you 1000$ per bullet shot.  That's perfectly fine.  But a Public range should have no such limit.   The government however is allowed to make laws and regulations that influence private property to protect the public.   Gun ownership would not fall into any of that as its not a threat.

Yup the magic of levels.  They went to far so dial it back a bit but not too much 

Swoooossshhhh.

Did i say that you said to hurt someone financially?  It was an example (english101). We know you rather hurt the unvaxxed mentally, which is worst. Making it hard for the unvaxxed to enjoy their precovid lifestyle can put mental stress on some. Look at the suicides in 2020, mainly the young adults.

#howamiacommunist

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Fakenews should be flagged but not removed.   Unless its malicious from an enemy state.  I never said I support everything the biden administration is doing...never voted for them either.

Who decides whats malicious? The same people who created the algorithms that only made mistakes against conservatives?

communism101 control the flow of info.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

We can debate on this all year long,  I don't think vaccine refusal would qualify her.   In the end the courts will decide.

Swoooshhh. Thinks its just a normal vaxx refusal.

Debate would continue all year due to your feelings.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Maybe we should just short hand all responses to OmniDumb with SWOOSH.  Big time saver and threads can move forward faster.

Or the board can add a new emoji....

You would have voted for them if not for us “trumpets” and our “fake news”. Remember that shit.

Not really. I voted Obama 2012, I voted for trump in 2016.  Voted for Jorgensen in 2020.  I don't do identity politics. 

so you admit you were wrong when you said "every"?

Every one that I've seen which is like maybe a few restaurants when I pick up food.  So it does qualify. 24 hrs is a bit tough though as I have no plans to go out today.

Who decides whats malicious? The same people who created the algorithms that only made mistakes against conservatives?

communism101 control the flow of info.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Fake news.  Prove its only against conservatives.  From what I saw that was disproved. 

Fake news.  Prove its only against conservatives.  From what I saw that was disproved.

U need glasses, or a stronger rx.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Typing something you believe you know is not a "reason".  It's an opinion.

You didn't post a single thing that supports your opinion, and most of your opinions were not related to the case in question.  Just a bunch of tangential things you think you know.

Your idea of "debate" is inline with the rest of your poor vocabulary.  Debate requires more than expressing a conclusion or ancillary tidbit of information.  It requires facts and logic that a reasonable person can agree is accurate.

You aren't even close.

I posted that legally scholarships can be canceled for many reasons, depending on the contract they sign.  I posted that people have been fired for not getting the vaccine.   I posted that as a private university they have leeway on admission.   If they feel students who are not vaxxed are a danger to other students they have the power to act on that.  We have evidence of current schools and workplaces can mandate vaccines.  When I went to school it was required to attend.  It was a private school so perfectly allowable. All true and all reasons why this would be perfectly allowable.  All full of logic and facts.