please show where CMO said hmsa had rules

Good thing the bill of rights isn't up to what you think is stupid or not.  You're making this a bigger deal of this due to the misunderstanding of Flapps story.

There was a clerical error on their part because he was unvaxxed and let into the office.  So I'm sure the next time they will ask before entering and follow HMSA's policy (not CDC's policy).  So why would the PCP have teo decide to keep his SIL as a patient or not due to their error?

All 3 are not related.  Some things need to proved in court.  Some need to be a consensus.  And well some things you can assume.  The world is not black and white.  Last time I checked this situation is not a court case.

goalpost moved from "cdc rules say outside for non-vaxx is correct" to "appropriate measures for distancing" to "only when alll parties are vaccinated can you be mask less"...

"If you're vaccinated, and you can't contract or transmit the virus, why does it matter if I am or not?"

This is a false statement that's why....for the 101st time.  A vaccine is not 100%. 

And for repeating myself to infinity.  The doctor does not need to explain his offices policy.  Indeed as puna wrote he can refer to another doctor.

He is not asking his doctors policy for infinity time. He is asking a covid question that the doctor was unable to answer.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Nope, I am vaxxed and at that point its up to the LGS to decide if that's a requirement.  I wear a mask and socially distance.   Doing my duty by law.  The point is that this is the doctors office and his rules.  You are a person patronizing his business, you need to follow his rules.  Its not your rules.  I have no say in what the business owners requirements are,  who his customers are or what they do.  Its up to me to decide if I want to go to that business and follow their rules.  I would do the same to your property.  If you said no (insert requirement here),  I would either comply or not enter your property.

Its almost as if the CDC guidelines change with new knowledge...and that I follow what the current guidelines are...

#science

Its almost as if the CDC guidelines change with new knowledge...and that I follow what the current guidelines are...

#science

If I had an establishment and I said that masks are required.  For you to enter you have to wear one.  I don't have to explain any reason or answer any questions.  Much like this doctor can just say, idk its policy.  Though doctor could of handled it better but I would need to confirm with them on what exactly happened so far this is all one sided.   

Nope,  but 1st amendment still exists about retorting said statements.  Its only forced upon me/others when they want to implement rules or laws that dictate things on the non religious or people of different religions.  Like prayer in school,  abortion bans,  god in the government.  Adoption of "biblical" rules, denying service based on their own religion, etc. 

That's true hypocrisy.  If they truely were about religious freedom than https://thesatanictemple.com/ would have as much right to allow abortion (insert other laws) as other religions have the right to ban it.

If I had an establishment and I said that masks are required.  For you to enter you have to wear one.  I don't have to explain any reason or answer any questions.  Much like this doctor can just say, idk its policy.  Though doctor could of handled it better but I would need to confirm with them on what exactly happened so far this is all one sided.   

Nope,  but 1st amendment still exists about retorting said statements.  Its only forced upon me/others when they want to implement rules or laws that dictate things on the non religious or people of different religions.  Like prayer in school,  abortion bans,  god in the government.  Adoption of "biblical" rules, denying service based on their own religion, etc. 

That's true hypocrisy.  If they truely were about religious freedom than https://thesatanictemple.com/ would have as much right to allow abortion (insert other laws) as other religions have the right to ban it.

Since the 1st amendment wasn't the basis for the Roe v. Wade decision, how the hell do you think the 1st Amendment has anything at all to do with abortion rights?

Churches are not banning abortions.  They do have the right to not offer that service in church-based hospitals or in church-based businesses via insurance coverage.

Making something you have to pay for elsewhere is not "banning it".  It's just not enabling it.

#SoStupid
#SuchAnIdiot
#NotSarcasm

Vaccine is not 100% (repeated for the 100th time). Two people with vaccines is less risk than one with a vaccine.   Its his/offices rules, don't need to question them.  The CDC still recommends everyone be vaccinated and only when all parties are vaccinated that mask less gathering be allowed.

Whos assuming now?

Where did I say that it was?  I said the 1st applies/implies to free speech of criticizing the religious zealots.

All this past 4 pages could be solved with the doctor saying,  Vaccine requirements for inside visits are set by policy and will be followed.  And end the convo there.    Better if he could explain that two vaccinated people are less risk than one. #ezmath