I'm in. I was working on the KHSC improvement petition a few years ago but it stagnated so I started HIFICO to build support first. I had some ideas for the range. One of the more drastic ones was to build a new skeet and trap range somewhere else and replace it with more bays. Birdshot don't reach out far so it's easier to build a range for that than for rifles. As with anything, funding will be the biggest problem especially when $10+ million is needed. It's going to require user fees, donations, concessions, and pittman robertson matching funds, though it's competing against the Big Island and Kauai for those funds.

Exactly the kind of stuff needed. I made it known that this effort has been going on for years and went largely ignored, and that the community just wants a chance to discuss this with people in the C&C who are are willing to listen and help or find a way to compromise.
I like the idea of userfees for upkeep, and I'm sure they would love the potential revenue source as well. I would have no problem paying to use bays, so long as I am not restricted to the current conditions; especially at the rifle and pistol ranges.
One thing I didn't get around to was making a survey of what people want. That's what everyone recommended should be done first.
If I had a wish list, I would want the bays leveled out to modern range standards; tired of shooting from a hill and being restricted to 2 set distances. I would like the ability to safely shoot at ground level at whatever distance I can set my target at, for both rifle and pistol. I also wouldn't mind completely doing away with designated pistol and rifle ranges and just expanding the bays/lanes to allow people to shoot whatever they want.
I agree that more input would be beneficial, but I think it's important to get the bug in their ears and get the ball rolling.
Great idea, not sure if we can get funding with the current economic situation. I be willing to donate though. Too bad we can't get one if those donate to X things on our tax forms.
She mentioned Mr. Waters is working on numerous budget related items; all out of wack, as to be expected with how corrupt and wasteful previous administrations have been. I assume that's why it's important to have him involved and gain his support to get this moving
Anotger possible taking point Im hoping the leaders of this effort can discuss is adopting the park. Mrs. Tupola wasn't aware that the park was under the jurisdiction of the C&C, and I told her previous attempts for organizations to adopt and care for the range went ignored.
I also informed her that there was interest from the community to fund or contribute to the renovations independently since nothing was being done, but that aldo went ignored.
I bet you guys that Knudsen is all over this, trying to panic the politicians about increased mayhem and phantom ballets flying over Koko crater.
Same time, you all have a far better chance at getting these improvements than we on the BI have getting any sort of range at all.
I'm willing to discuss the bullet incident if this meeting comes to fruition, but not sure if it's necessary or beneficial. I think what's most important is to demonstrate that one of, if not the most popular C&C of Oahu park has been and is being largely neglected, and that improvements and renovations that have been ignored must be implemented for safety reasons. A personal example I have is my father became walking impaired in his later years and struggled to reach the target. This could be fixed by simply making the lanes ground level and also allowing people to shoot at closer distances.
A major overhaul of range design might seem out of the question, but when you factor in issues with access for disabled individuals, safety issues with an outdated range design from WWII and lack of essential infrastructure (like functioning bathrooms and drinking water sources), it greatly justifies the necessity for the implementation of the ideas many of you have.