U.S. Air Force held a war game that started with a Chinese biological attack (Read 6875 times)

drck1000

Need a paid account. Why don’t you give me the Readers Digest version. Let me guess, they will have 3 or 4 carriers to our one that is in the region?

Kuleana

China lost the trade war with the US. We were selling them soy, rice, tariffs, etc... It would only be a matter of time b4 other countries follow cause we showed what we can do.  So China would lose to those countries as well. So what does China do, unleash a virus in their country (collateral damage).
What measure are you using to say that China lost the trade war with the US empire?  The Chinese economy is the most stable functioning economy, on the planet, right now.



How come Beijing wasn't as affected compared to Wuhan.
China has some of the most effective Covid-19 counter-measures in the World.  Their province/city shutdowns, contact tracing, and community testing are way effective and efficient compared to the US empire.



Covid spread across the entire US and no state was safe.
According to some, on this very forum, Covid-19 was not as lethal, as presented.  Hence, if their interpretation was true, how could any part of America been in any real danger?



Then it spreads internationally and everyone's economy tanks. 
The international spreading of Covid-19 is a byproduct of globalization.  Not China's fault.



But ours not as much as they hoped thanks to Trump and no thanks to people like Ige shutting down a state from their sole source of economic income.
This depends on whether the real threat of Covid-19 was real or not.  In any case, China was not responsible, for the actions the US empire took, during the beginning of Covid-19.  The resulting economic fallout was solely the blame of the empire's political authority.

Inspector


Thanks! This is exactly why we need to invest in assets capable of defeating China as the article insinuates.
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

drck1000

Thanks! This is exactly why we need to invest in assets capable of defeating China as the article insinuates.
I "believe" (can't provide facts) that that's only part of the story.  That and changes of Command brings many changes at Davidson's level.  I've gotten to know, or at least have met with him in person a couple of times, his replacement a little through a program I am working on now.  Build up in the Pacific has been going on for a while.  Interesting that the spotlight has been on the CVNs lately.  I've given up my projects in Guam over 2 years ago now, but still hear from them from time to time. 

Inspector

I "believe" (can't provide facts) that that's only part of the story.  That and changes of Command brings many changes at Davidson's level.  I've gotten to know, or at least have met with him in person a couple of times, his replacement a little through a program I am working on now.  Build up in the Pacific has been going on for a while.  Interesting that the spotlight has been on the CVNs lately.  I've given up my projects in Guam over 2 years ago now, but still hear from them from time to time.
Thanks for the info. I’m no expert here and can only go by what I read and I try to keep and open mind and understand what I am reading may not be exactly accurate.
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

drck1000

Thanks for the info. I’m no expert here and can only go by what I read and I try to keep and open mind and understand what I am reading may not be exactly accurate.
Haha. Even for me, most do the stuff I hear is either “old news” or many levels of filtered. It’s rare these days that I am anywhere near current.

I was just pointing out that usually news that makes it through sources like StarAd, Yahoo, etc typically are spun by and angle, as wells as folks taking it in many different directions.

eyeeatingfish

You can't ignore a serious threat from nukes which exist in the hands of our enemies.  Just because we are less likely to be hit by nukes vs. other means is no justification for letting our guard down in all other areas.

So, you have a guard dog, alarm system, motion detector lights and surveillance system.  Does that mean you don't need a firearm, too?

My post was not to say that we should give up our nukes. Rather I was asking the question of whether nukes would be necessary to destroy us. I was saying cyber attacks could potentially so debilitate us a nuke would not be necessary.

robtmc