Didnt SHOPO push her out by saying 'Her Quota demands were too high" thus admitting quotas do exist, which AFAIK are not legal, even tho EVERYONE knows they exist but pretend they dont?
According to the news last night, she decided to retire after she received a poor annual performance review from the Police Commission last week.
Her take on it is she's lost the trust of the Commission members and the new mayoral administration, and she's been a victim of rampant rumors (which she didn't elaborate on).
The Commission said the performance review was less than satisfactory, but it was done to provide a specific list of areas that need improvement -- something the Commission said was a list they looked forward to working closely with Ballard to correct and improve on during the next year.
In my opinion, this is typically what results from an evaluation system that is usually inflated to make the leadership seem outstanding even when there have been failures. Performance reviews become necessary administrative exercises that are never used to document problems unless you are trying to limit the person's ability to get promoted or to build a case for termination. I've seen this in both military and DoD civilian performance review systems.
So, Ballard saw the poor performance ratings as a scathing rebuke of her capabilities, and the commission saw it as constructive criticism. That's how I see it, anyway, based on what the news showed.
The Mayor was surprised that Ballard made the comment that his offices had no trust for her. He would have tried to have her replaced if that were the case.
I hope the tax payers don't get stuck with some kind of massive severance payout and $175K annual retirement package like we were with the previous former police chief!
