Sent from my moto g power (2021) using Tapatalk

biden:  I resent that all you people think I'm not smart.....

America:  But you are not.  You are not.  You are not smart.

biden:  Oh yeah??!!  WHO IS BETTER FOR PRESIDENT:  ME OR KAMALA??

America:  (silence).......

biden:  See??!!  See what I did there?  Huh?!!  HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA..........

And the decline of our nation, spiraling hopelessly out of control, continues.......

Somebody explain what House Resolution 529 is.
I need an English translation.
Came out about the same time as the sub story.
===========
sorry, I made a typo
I meant 529 not 429

revised

Somebody explain what House Resolution 429 is.
I need an English translation.
Came out about the same time as the sub story.

As I read it, it’s to prevent double taxation of the same income made by someone who works the same job, but spends significant amounts of time in two or more states.

(I don’t know if the states I’m about to use as examples have these kinds of laws about taxes; just using examples)

Let’s say you work for Amazon Headquarters (which is located in Washington state; no state income tax there), but you do that remotely and you split your time between Montana in the summer and Arizona in the winter.  Let’s also say each of those two states have laws that if you spend more than 30 days in that state, all of your income for the year is subject to their state tax.  In that case, your entire income would get taxed in two states.  It looks like HR 429 says the only income taxable in Montana is income made while you’re physically in Montana, and the same for Arizona; no state can tax income you made while physically in another state (for more than 30 days), even if it’s from the same job.

I’m SURE that’s an oversimplification, and I might be completely wrong…

As I read it, it’s to prevent double taxation of the same income made by someone who works the same job, but spends significant amounts of time in two or more states.

(I don’t know if the states I’m about to use as examples have these kinds of laws about taxes; just using examples)

Let’s say you work for Amazon Headquarters (which is located in Washington state; no state income tax there), but you do that remotely and you split your time between Montana in the summer and Arizona in the winter.  Let’s also say each of those two states have laws that if you spend more than 30 days in that state, all of your income for the year is subject to their state tax.  In that case, your entire income would get taxed in two states.  It looks like HR 429 says the only income taxable in Montana is income made while you’re physically in Montana, and the same for Arizona; no state can tax income you made while physically in another state (for more than 30 days), even if it’s from the same job.

I’m SURE that’s an oversimplification, and I might be completely wrong…

==
==============
sorry, I meant 529 not 429

==
==============
sorry, I meant 529 not 429

Looks like it would prohibit immigration enforcement actions within 1000 feet of:

• health care facilities;
• schools and school bus stops;
• places that provide assistance for people such as children, pregnant women, and abuse victims;
• places that provide disaster or emergency services;
• places of worship;
• courthouses and lawyers' offices; and
• public assistance offices.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/529

Somebody explain what House Resolution 529 is.
I need an English translation.
Came out about the same time as the sub story.
===========
sorry, I made a typo
I meant 529 not 429

revised

Looks like a stepping stone for sanctuary for illegal aliens.  Started with a "sensitive places" list, which will be expanded until it encompasses all public spaces.

Anytime law enforcement is prohibited from enforcing the law, the purpose is more than likely political -- not for public safety.

I meant HR 529 from this year a few days ago. Not last year.
Is this something we aren't supposed to talk about?
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-resolution/529

I meant HR 529 from this year a few days ago. Not last year.
Is this something we aren't supposed to talk about?
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-resolution/529

Sorry, just googled “HR 529” and went to what came up.

The HR 529 you’re talking about seems to be another meaningless attempt to weaponize political processes, doomed to fail, just like the impeachments of President Trump.

Sorry, just googled “HR 529” and went to what came up.

The HR 529 you’re talking about seems to be another meaningless attempt to weaponize political processes, doomed to fail, just like the impeachments of President Trump.

Not exactly.

An impeachment can offer all kinds of investigatory leverage that doesn't exist during a normal investigation outside of impeachment proceedings.

Clinton was impeached, but not on the original suspicions the House wanted to get him for.  The independent council conducting the investigation discovered that Slick Willy was having an affair with a WH intern, and then he lied under oath about it.

The cover-up is often worse than the actual crime.

Several experts have argued that the House might have a stronger legal position in disputes
with the executive branch over information and witness appearances if it were undertaking
impeachment proceedings rather than investigations. Michael Conway, who served as counsel
on the House judiciary committee during the Watergate investigation, has advanced a similar
argument. In particular, he points to a staff memo written in April 1974, which argues that “the
Supreme Court has contrasted the broad scope of the inquiry power of the House in impeachment
proceedings with its more confined scope in legislative investigations. From the beginning of the
Federal Government, presidents have stated that in an impeachment inquiry the Executive Branch
could be required to produce papers that it might with‐hold in a legislative investigation.”

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/what-powers-does-formal-impeachment-inquiry-give-house

Impeachment is by its very nature a political "tool" which used to be used only in cases of actual laws being broken.  Under Pelosi, they no longer cared about whether or not laws were broken, so they went after Trump time and again for ludicrous, unprovable BS charges.

Talk about weaponizing the process!  At least in Biden's case, there are real laws being alleged to have been broken, including money laundering, tax evasion, etc, etc.

This has nothing to do with biden not being smart.  I still believe he is not a smart man.  However, this has nothing to do with being smart or dumb but everything to do with mental decline.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/we-need-a-serious-conversation-about-joe-biden-s-brain/ar-AA1dmpiY?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=e347e94c8eb647368cfdb8eefa816eae&ei=21

Joe and his family are creepier than the Adams family.
10 percent for the big guy.

Here's another thing that, in my opinion, shows biden is not smart.

He dodges the question as to whether he has a 7th grandchild.  The innocent child fathered by his horny son and the stripper.

To me, it would have been smarter to acknowledge the child.  I read an article somewhere mentioning that the bidens put up a Christmas stocking for their f*cking dog but only had stockings for their 6 "acknowledged" grandchildren.

When the secret's out, best to acknowledge than be silent.  Only pukes would go silent.

Again, just my opinion on how biden, his worthless son, his family, and biden's administration (caretakers ) are handling the situation.

Here's another thing that, in my opinion, shows biden is not smart.

He dodges the question as to whether he has a 7th grandchild.  The innocent child fathered by his horny son and the stripper.

To me, it would have been smarter to acknowledge the child.  I read an article somewhere mentioning that the bidens put up a Christmas stocking for their f*cking dog but only had stockings for their 6 "acknowledged" grandchildren.

When the secret's out, best to acknowledge than be silent.  Only pukes would go silent.

Again, just my opinion on how biden, his worthless son, his family, and biden's administration (caretakers ) are handling the situation.

My brother got married, and just before she was due, he got a girlfriend pregnant, too.  (Don't ask me, I don't know what he was thinking!)

So, he stayed with the wife until after the child was born and she was able to do what she needed without help.  Then he moved in with the girlfriend.

After his divorce, he stayed with the girlfriend and had 2 more kids.  Later, he left her and is living with just his new girlfriend, and no kids.

After the divorce, his first child never stopped being my mother's grandson.  My mom just made sure that when the grandson and his family visited, my brother was told not to be there at the same time.

Likewise, every child from the girlfriend relationship was treated no differently.  They were all grandchildren, even though they never made it official with a wedding.

You can pick your friends, and you can pick your mates, but you can't pick your blood relatives.  Joe has a son, and the son has a child. They can't pretend that's not true.

And the articles call the grandchild and the mother "estranged." Once again, the media is lying.  You can't be estranged until after you've been accepted as part of the family.

The child has been abandoned.  No different than the father sneaking away a week before the birth, never to return..

When the child is older and learns that the most powerful man in the nation and his loser son refused to make the child a part of their lives, it's going to have an effect.  I can't wait for Hunter to kick the bucket, and watch as the child sues for their rightful inheritance.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-lets-american-military-info-slip-during-live-interview-sparking-backlash

The article spent most of its space commenting on the Resident's apparent admission that we are substituting cluster bombs for other artillery due to a low supply in Ukraine.

No matter how they try to spin it and gas light us (what you heard me say is not what I said), the actual fact is, the US and Ukraine would not be using a munition that has been criticized and/or banned by countries like  the UK, Spain, Germany, and Canada as well as Human Rights Watch and the United Nations unless there is a serious shortage of "better" munitions.

That's the real scandal -- not that the Resident is publicly divulging military secrets -- but that we are increasing the use of munitions that may constitute a war crime.

The big problem with cluster bombs is the "bomblets" often fail to detonate, leaving small, live bombs scattered around the area.  Civilians, quite often children, who find these UXOs (unexploded ordnances) routinely die from the encounter.  This can happen long after hostilities have ceased.

Biden is not just a joke.  He's a dangerous puppet, and the things he does have serious consequences.  The fact he's arming a country that the US likely has no business arming makes it even worse.

Biden: Did you get those weapons we shipped you?

Zelenskyy:  Yes, thanks.  Can we have more?  We're about out already.

Biden:  I asked the Pentagon, and production is slow.  How about these borderline-illegal cluster bombs?  You've been a UN member for as long as we have.  Shouldn't be a big deal.

Zelenskyy:  Thanks again.  Don't know what we would have done without you and your country's money all these years.

Biden:  Hey, quid pro quo, man!  No joke!!  Oh, yeah.  Hunter says, "High." 

That little girl is scarred for life.  Way to go, brandon.