then why didn't you say that?
your first sentence questions the efficacy of existing vaccines...
therefore, NOT a strawman

From the news I have heard, a company is developing a traditional style vaccine to combat covid (inactivated viruses). I am curious, for the people who are vaccine hesitant due to mRNA being a new technology, would you guys then go get this new vaccine?

From the news I have heard, a company is developing a traditional style vaccine to combat covid (inactivated viruses). I am curious, for the people who are vaccine hesitant due to mRNA being a new technology, would you guys then go get this new vaccine?

Questioned the efficacy so we could compare them to other vaccines. So for example if covid vaccines are 65% effective but most other vaccines are 75% effective (made up number) then we have a gauge to say how good or poorly the covid vaccine is fairing.

Questioned the efficacy so we could compare them to other vaccines. So for example if covid vaccines are 65% effective but most other vaccines are 75% effective (made up number) then we have a gauge to say how good or poorly the covid vaccine is fairing.

those types of vaccines already exist
sinovac (chinese) and sputnik (russian)

novavax (using moth cells to make spike proteins) is perhaps what you are thinking of
this is also a more traditional form of vaccine (making parts of the virus that are unable to replicate and infect)
and is more close to being approved
however, they are having issues with being able to efficiently get a proper concentration of spike protein...

if you would have worded it like in your second post, it would've been obvious what your point was
therefore, not a strawman

Could that thing just be bureaucracy? Trials are notoriously slow and just look at the difficulty for patients who are dying to be allowed to take experimental treatments.

You didn't answer my question though. And for the sake of my question I had in mind an American vaccine.

(Personally I wouldn't trust a Russian vaccine and even less so a Chinese one)

You didn't answer my question though. And for the sake of my question I had in mind an American vaccine.

(Personally I wouldn't trust a Russian vaccine and even less so a Chinese one)

Sure, these things are all potential possibilities, but I think we should weigh that against the unknowns of covid as well shouldn't we? What if covid affects reproduction and we don't find out for a few years?
I do have a certain amount of faith that scientists have, in their 3 decades of studying this mrna technology, figured out enough to at least have a general idea of how it interacts with our body. Doesn't alleviate all my fear though. I will say though, if everyone had the attitude of a new vaccine having zero track record then we would have any vaccines ever because no one would be willing to take it.

I think figuring out the current pandemic would be more high priority than figuring out why the flu isn't killing more people. Plus the masking, hand washing, and isolation sure makes a lot sense in explaining this disappearance.
I fully agree it is a stupid mistake not to consider natural immunity as equivalent to being vaccinated for the purposes of any government mandates.
I don't know what you mean when you say no one has isolated and analyzed the covid virus. So we haven't really seen it under a microscope before?

You are making this harder than it has to be.
https://www.johnccarleton.org/BLOGGER/2021/08/07/written-proof-cdc-has-no-isolated-purified-sample-of-sars-cov-2-virus-that-causes-covid-19/

You are making this harder than it has to be.
https://www.johnccarleton.org/BLOGGER/2021/08/07/written-proof-cdc-has-no-isolated-purified-sample-of-sars-cov-2-virus-that-causes-covid-19/
So how did they make a vaccine for a virus they didnt analyse?  The patents for the "vaxxs" were filed years ago. The current tests dont distinguish between covid, flu, cold or others.
Masks never got rid of the flu same as they dont stop covid. Where did the flu go?  Probably nowhere. Covid flu cold.... Whatever.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/47-studies-confirm-inefectiveness-of-masks-for-covid-and-32-more-confirm-their-negative-health-effects/
EUA vax would not be allowed to be authorized unless no treatments are available. Ignore the hit pieces on HCQ and the 2015 Nobel prize for ivermectin and you are set. EUA granted. 

why do i have to answer your question?
it's just one more of your hypothetical word games...

https://www.kitv.com/story/45087930/fda-authorizes-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-for-children-5-to-11

Zero benefit. Way too much risk. This goes beyond unethical or negligent into the territory of criminal and possibly even demonic.