If I wanted to control what you say, you would be always addressing me by my preferred adjectives.   

Come on!  Let me hear you say it: Tall, Dark, & Handsome!

apparently, Trump is resuming full-on military aid to UKR (not what I voted for).

I'm more interested in ending the conflict than the amount of support needed to do that.

Biden was trickling support to Ukraine in ways that obviously didn't make a huge dent in the front lines. 

Perhaps this massive mobilization is needed to drive Putin back into Russia, similar to how Reagan pushed for massive improvements in military spending.  If Putin can't muster enough resources to counter that build-up, he'll either back down and negotiate, or he'll be forced to use nukes.

I don't believe Putin is someone who would use nukes in a first strike.  He'd wind up losing much more than would ever be gained.

although:

nowadays, a recent study of the UKR-RUS war, shows that 75% of war deaths and injuries are caused by FPV drones, 20% by artillery, and only 4% caused by small arms fire.  average med evac time was 14.5hrs, influenced by the omnipresent drone threat.

Perhaps this massive mobilization is needed to drive Putin back into Russia, similar to how Reagan pushed for massive improvements in military spending.

If Putin can't muster enough resources to counter that build-up, he'll either back down and negotiate, or he'll be forced to use nukes.

Your neocon statement above clearly shows your willful ignorance of the roots of this conflict and the Russian goals that need to be satisfied for it to end.
Your comment shows you have only insults and name-calling to use as attacks.

Sad.

The Russian Federation has more than enough resources to crush any conventional or nuclear hostile attacks from the US empire directly or indirectly.

The fact the previous senile old fool refused to commit the land forces of the US empire to Ukraine is proof of this.  If the US empire was so confident of victory over Russia, it would have sent its marines to Ukraine before the Russian special military operation began.
I don't think you understand how a proxy war is run.  Committing land forces of the US to Ukraine would not be in the playbook for a proxy war.

Maybe you should look up the definition of "Proxy."  You keep calling that war a proxy for the US, but you simultaneously argue that the US can only demonstrate strength by direct military engagement. 

So strange.

Your neocon statement above clearly shows your willful ignorance of the roots of this conflict and the Russian goals that need to be satisfied for it to end.


The Russian Federation has more than enough resources to crush any conventional or nuclear hostile attacks from the US empire directly or indirectly.

The fact the previous senile old fool refused to commit the land forces of the US empire to Ukraine is proof of this.  If the US empire was so confident of victory over Russia, it would have sent its marines to Ukraine before the Russian special military operation began.

Your comment shows you have only insults and name-calling to use as attacks.

Maybe you should look up the definition of "Proxy."  You keep calling that war a proxy for the US, but you simultaneously argue that the US can only demonstrate strength by direct military engagement.

we've been waiting for over 3 years for the russian federation to crush ukraine...

we've been waiting for over 3 years for the russian federation to crush ukraine...

Have you seen Ukraine recently?

Its economy is in shambles; most of its young men under thirty that did not flee from military service are dead; they are now completely dependent on foreign aid for daily survival; etc.

What more carnage in Ukraine does your blind eyes need to see how Ukraine already has been destroyed? 

Sad...

Military casualty counts are contested, with Ukraine and Russia closely
guarding data about their forces. In December 2024, Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky said 43,000 Ukrainian soldiers had been killed and
370,000 injured since February 2022; he also said 198,000 Russian soldiers
had been killed and 550,000 injured. None of these claims was verifiable;
Russia has said its losses are less than Ukraine’s.

The New York Times has cited U.S. intelligence sources claiming, as of
August 2023, estimated Russian losses of 120,000 dead and 170,000–
180,000 wounded as well as estimated Ukrainian losses of 70,000 dead
and 100,000–120,000 wounded. British and European officials have also
made estimates, while independent researchers and journalists have used
open-source data to count losses.

Have you seen Ukraine recently?

Its economy is in shambles; most of its young men under thirty that did not flee from military service are dead; they are now completely dependent on foreign aid for daily survival; etc.

What more carnage in Ukraine does your blind eyes need to see how Ukraine already has been destroyed? 

Sad...

Where did you find that stat saying most men under 30 are dead? 
Nobody will know the true casualty count as well as the ages and genders most impacted until long after the conflict ends.  Statistics like yours exist to support talking points since they can't be verified -- but I'm sure you can prove me wrong by posting that link.

none of that is what you said

sad...

silence, huh?
just like over a year ago when you said that russia was going to overwhelm ukraine...

You clearly demonstrate your lack of understanding of the Russian goals in their special military operation in Ukraine.

If you thought their goal was to take over all of Ukraine, you have not paid any attention to what the Russians have been saying all along.  Go educate yourself of what the Russians said their goals are rather than what the US empire thinks what the Russian goals are.

Maybe then, you can see that the Russians have overwhelmed Ukraine based on their goals.

[...]
Why would Ukraine even need to do all that above if many of its men 30-year-old and under are not already hiding outside of their country or no longer alive on this World?