I took the bait and bought some Speer Gold Dot for short barrel pistols. The specs seemed to point to higher performance in velocity.
Then I found reviews with comparisons. While they tend to work as advertised against bare skin and light-clothing-covered skin (T-shit), heavier clothing resulted in worse penetration and expansion results than standard 9mm ammo.
I bought mine from Young Guns several years ago. At that time, they were to only place within a reasonable distance of my home that carried any SB ammo.
Three most important performance criteria (aside from "goes bang") are:
- Penetration
- Expansion
- Retained bullet weight
Some use a filler in the hollow point cavity to avoid it catching or expanding as it encounters heavy clothing. I've noticed mixed results in independent reviews/tests.
So, for me, I'll stick with regular ammo that shows a high degree of penetration through clothing and skin. Never know what kind of "threat" you'll encounter.
I feel these ammunition types are compensating for not having been fired from a more effective barrel length. If it were that impressive, wouldn't everyone be using it regardless of the barrel type they carry? I mean, improvements for smaller pistols should translate into improvements for other pistols.
That's mostly opinion. As I've never shot anyone, nor have I done any scientific tests or comparisons, I'm only basing this on what I've been able to find online.
#YMMV
