The Attorney General is on the state side while the PD is on the city side, I wonder if the PD is seeking an opinion from a city agency.
There still seems to be a bit of grey area by the parts of the law that remain so they may be trying to figure out how the remaining provisions apply. He will have to approve at least some otherwise he is violating the standing but somewhere he will draw a line and I wonder where that will be.
The Chief uses the state law HRS134-9 since there is no CCW county ordinance (ROH). And denial letters refer to HRS134-9 on the letter. The chiefs denial letter to Andrew of HIFICO stated he was waiting on the AG and that the AG was awaiting on a ruling on Young by the 9th.
Guess the AG realized they will have to pay big bucks if the 9th makes a ruling before they change the law due to it being unconstitutional. So the AG issued the letter. Now Logan's excuse is he is waiting on "consul" to advise him. This is now what we call using logic to read between the lines. Logan is goal post moving to delay any permits as long as he can. I mean if he said that he was waiting on plastic cards so they can print them, that would be a better excuse. Logan could issue them the next day as well, but doesn't. He has failed his first test as the new chief. Which is why I posted SSDD.
The grey area you are referring to is what HI and Logan are doing to find a reason to still deny permits. Instead of taking the SCOTUS for face value and their intent. I posted about this already. There also is no "a bit of grey area".
Why do you think the AG also mentions permanent residents in their letter. Because the main guy doing all of this sued HPD and won because they denied his permit to acquire because he was not a US citizen. Then recently the state lost against American Samoans in HI who they too have been denying permits to acquire.
This is what we call corruption. Your new boss isn't starting off too well.