Auntie Hirono continues to show America and the world that she is the dumbest senator to ever grace the halls of the senate.

And some people in Hawaii stand proud of the fact that they have sent their cream of the crop to represent their state.

Stupid is what stoopid does....

Auntie Hirono continues to show America and the world that she is the dumbest senator to ever grace the halls of the senate.

And some people in Hawaii stand proud of the fact that they have sent their cream of the crop to represent their state.

Stupid is what stoopid does....

I think Murry takes that crown "dunmbest"
Crazy Mazie just reinforces the attitude that Hawaii is full
of racist anti-white Japs and Chinks. there is only about 1.5 million
there so why bother?  They all do as they are
told and it is a good base for the military.
If Honolulu gets Nuked who cares?
All the outer islands will cheer it on.
 

It's because those folks are educated and have taken the time to read the history and evolution of what's in the Constitution and how it has evolved over the years.  Claiming ignorance isn't an excuse.  Convenient for folks to drone on and on about "prove it to me", but that's NOT how the Bill of Rights is structured. 

careful, that's someone's mom here

he/she/it is only a lurker now...

careful, that's someone's mom here

Auntie Mazie took an oath of office.  She raised her right hand (wouldn't be surprised she raised her left) and swore to uphold and protect the constitution from all enemies, foreign or domestic (like her).

And as soon as that was done, immediately began to work to circumvent and destroy the very foundation that formed this free country.

Thank God that other senators and members of congress don't take her seriously.

Believe all women...unless they are conservatives or go against a DNC member.

She says is there any reference to AR15s in our Constitution?  No.

Well dumbass, yes there is.  The 2A says arms, which encompasses all weapons.  Just like if you use the word cars. It means all makes and models of cars.  I ask the village idiot, is there any reference to abortions in the Constitution?   No, so how can you say it is a woman's constitutional right to have one.

She says is there any reference to AR15s in our Constitution?  No.

Well dumbass, yes there is.  The 2A says arms, which encompasses all weapons.  Just like if you use the word cars. It means all makes and models of cars.  I ask the village idiot, is there any reference to abortions in the Constitution?   No, so how can you say it is a woman's constitutional right to have one.

Because feelings & emotion > logic

Bruh [sarcasm\]

Auntie Hirono continues to show America and the world that she is the dumbest senator to ever grace the halls of the senate.

And some people in Hawaii stand proud of the fact that they have sent their cream of the crop to represent their state.

Stupid is what stoopid does....

Cream and shit both float to the top.

And yes she IS stoopid with 2 "O's"

Cream and shit both float to the top.

And yes she IS stoopid with 2 "O's"

I thought shit don't float!?

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Way to go Auntie Mazie!  Hawaii is proud of you!  (NOT!!!!)

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hirono-under-fire-for-remarks-on-constitution-who-the-heck-would-know-what-our-founding-fathers-meant/ar-AAZxImG?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=0b49f53fe18646efb3471e7527646c14

"Just shut up and step up!  Do the right thing for once!"

-- Senator Lazy Mazie Hirono, to the MEN of the nation
Trying to lecture us to support the lies about Kavanaugh in his hearing.

To this day, not one piece of evidence has been offered to support ANY of the several accusations made in his confirmation.

Why the F* do we still give any of these elected liars the time of day?  They're proven liars.  Nothing they say is apart from partisan politicking. The ends justifies the means, even if it involves made up, unprovable lies.

Just ask Harry Reid.

You heard it from Mazie, folks. Stop studying history. It's a waste of time.

I find it instructional ... that the Constitution has existed since 1776, and that the Second Amendment was ratified in 1791.  In order for the amendment to be adopted, there had to be a super-majority of states vote for it.

Did you know, the 2nd A was adopted from English law?  They enacted the Bill of Rights of 1698, which among other things includes the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment and confirmed that "Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law."

Ours is more inclusive, but same "arms for defense" premise.

Prior to this Constitutional Amendment, 7 states already included in their State Constitutions the right to keep and bear arms.

If the 2nd is so antiquated and out-of-date, why has it remained unamended for over 230 years?  Are we to assume the same justifications she names today never existed prior to this period of time?

Machine guns were allowed like any other firearm until 1934, when you had to start applying for an NFA tax stamp to buy one. Then, in 1968, the import and manufacture of machine guns for civilians was outlawed.  Not once was the Constitution amended to exclude these firearms from "the people".  Why not?  Why has there been no attempt to rewrite that one amendment so it would be easier to pass national gun control laws without bumping into the Second Amendment.

It's because until now, the courts went along with gun control as a means of protecting public safety.  They lose sight of the reason the government should not be dictating to the people what arms we may possess to defend against a tyrannical government.

I would argue with Hirono, "So, if you disagree with the latest court rulings upholding second amendment rights, and you defend your position saying we don't know what the founders intended, what makes you SO SURE gun control laws are constitutional?  Without knowing the amendment's intent, you can't argue either side of gun control -- pro or con."

But, that would be the same as trying to teach a pig how to sing....

Trying not to wonder off too much , but why do you pay attention to what a cop
tells you to do?
It it because you respect his office?
( respect the rank not the man)
OR is it because he has a gun and you don't?
He can shoot you and most likely get a nice paid vacation out of it.
I suspect officers would be far more respectful
and circumspect,  if they knew a substantial
part of their interactions were one where the "perp" might be armed.
That is what scares government people.  We the people  explaining to the
government that they work for us and using the barrel of a gun to make that point.
That scares Liberals.
 

Trying not to wonder off too much , but why do you pay attention to what a cop
tells you to do?
It it because you respect his office?
( respect the rank not the man)
OR is it because he has a gun and you don't?
He can shoot you and most likely get a nice paid vacation out of it.
I suspect officers would be far more respectful
and circumspect,  if they knew a substantial
part of their interactions were one where the "perp" might be armed.
That is what scares government people.  We the people  explaining to the
government that they work for us and using the barrel of a gun to make that point.
That scares Liberals.
 

Because he has the legal authority to enforce laws.  If the Cop messes up, there are remedies and processes outside of on-the-spot refusal to comply.

Depending on the circumstances, a simple argument over a statute (like whether or not a particular accessory is legal to install on a vehicle) is much different than being ordered to lie down and interlock your fingers behind your head.  While I might be inclined to discuss a traffic or other minor violation with the officer to try and have him let me off with a warning, I'm not going to scream about my rights and the Constitution with guns aimed my direction.

I remember hearing this from old TV shows about Cops:  "Save it for the judge."  I still think that's good advice, especially if police BodyCam/Dashcam video and personal Cellphone/Dashcam video have been recorded of the interaction.  It's difficult for Cops to wield total control over innocent "perps" without it being caught on video somewhere, somehow.

I respect the LAW.  Whether or not I respect the person authorized to enforce the law is up to the individual Cop.  No different than any other profession.  Some are great, others are A.H.'s.