People, people, people... I hate to burst the bubble of raging discontent, but... SCOTUS rather adamantly clarified that the "two step process" and "deference to the state in cases of public safety", etc., etc., etc. are clearly invalid methodologies for evaluating Second Amendment claims. They made clear that the ONLY lawful method of adjudicating claims is "text, history, and tradition". Now for the bad news: I'm pretty sure I read an essay by John Adams, written in 1789, two years before the adoption of the Bill of Rights, in which he clearly stated that level two holsters and psychiatric evaluations and "live fire proficiency testing", etc., would be necessities, repeated annually, for anyone to bear a firearm outside their home (but only in their county of residence). So, they've got the "text, history, and tradition" on their side. Ask them.